Improving diagnostics of pulmonary embolism with clinical prediction models in a clinic of pulmonary diseases

Purpose of the Study: Clinical prediction models have been developed to assess the pre-test probability for pulmonary embolism (PE). The Wells model and the revised Geneva score are the two most well studied. Our purpose was to compare the two prediction models, and indentify the frequent clinical f...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Aleksander Marin, Igor Požek, Renato Eržen, Pika Meško Brguljan, Mitja Košnik
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Slovenian Medical Association 2010-10-01
Series:Zdravniški Vestnik
Online Access:http://vestnik.szd.si/index.php/ZdravVest/article/view/310
_version_ 1819100594858622976
author Aleksander Marin
Igor Požek
Renato Eržen
Pika Meško Brguljan
Mitja Košnik
author_facet Aleksander Marin
Igor Požek
Renato Eržen
Pika Meško Brguljan
Mitja Košnik
author_sort Aleksander Marin
collection DOAJ
description Purpose of the Study: Clinical prediction models have been developed to assess the pre-test probability for pulmonary embolism (PE). The Wells model and the revised Geneva score are the two most well studied. Our purpose was to compare the two prediction models, and indentify the frequent clinical findings of PE in patients admitted to the University Clinic of Pulmonary and Allergic Diseases Golnik. Methods: In 100 random emergency department patients and hospital inpatients with suspected PE and performed pulmonary CT angiography (CTPA) as the gold standard, a retrospective assessment of the clinical probability of PE by the Wells rule and the revised Geneva score was made. ECG, D-dimer, NT-proBNP, arterial blood gas analysis, chest X-ray, CTPA and 13 other clinical findings were analysed as well. Results: Average age was 65 years (SD 14.5), 39 % were male. The overall prevalence of PE was 33 %. The rates of PE in low, moderate, and high PE risk groups as determined according to the Wells model and the revised Geneva score were 3.7, 53,1, 100, and 14.3, 32.1, 83.3 %, respectively. ROC analysis showed that the Wells model was statistically more accurate than the Geneva score with the area under the curve (AUC) in Wells model 0.85 (95 % CI 0.762–0.936) and in Geneva score 0.73 (95 % CI 0.612–0.838). Sudden dyspnea, active malignancy, venous thromboembolism (VTE) history, estrogen therapy, deep vein thrombosis (DVT) signs, ECG changes and lower PaCO2 were significantly more frequent in PE group. All patients with PE had an increased concentration of D-dimer, and no PE were diagnosed in the group of patients with normal D-dimer. CTPA was ordered in 17 % of patients with low pre-test probability of PE according to Wells criteria and normal D-dimer. Conclusions: The Wells model is more accurate than the Geneva scoring system for the diagnosis of PE in patients admitted to a pulmonary clinic. Additional findings, such as sudden dyspnea, estrogen therapy, ECG changes and lower PaCO2, should always be incorporated in clinical assessment of PE. Adding the Wells algorithm to the clinical pathway for PE management might slightly decrease the number of CTPA.
first_indexed 2024-12-22T01:05:16Z
format Article
id doaj.art-473ded069d694bb7a3919ba5dd3b64c1
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1318-0347
1581-0224
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-22T01:05:16Z
publishDate 2010-10-01
publisher Slovenian Medical Association
record_format Article
series Zdravniški Vestnik
spelling doaj.art-473ded069d694bb7a3919ba5dd3b64c12022-12-21T18:44:06ZengSlovenian Medical AssociationZdravniški Vestnik1318-03471581-02242010-10-017910202Improving diagnostics of pulmonary embolism with clinical prediction models in a clinic of pulmonary diseasesAleksander MarinIgor PožekRenato ErženPika Meško BrguljanMitja KošnikPurpose of the Study: Clinical prediction models have been developed to assess the pre-test probability for pulmonary embolism (PE). The Wells model and the revised Geneva score are the two most well studied. Our purpose was to compare the two prediction models, and indentify the frequent clinical findings of PE in patients admitted to the University Clinic of Pulmonary and Allergic Diseases Golnik. Methods: In 100 random emergency department patients and hospital inpatients with suspected PE and performed pulmonary CT angiography (CTPA) as the gold standard, a retrospective assessment of the clinical probability of PE by the Wells rule and the revised Geneva score was made. ECG, D-dimer, NT-proBNP, arterial blood gas analysis, chest X-ray, CTPA and 13 other clinical findings were analysed as well. Results: Average age was 65 years (SD 14.5), 39 % were male. The overall prevalence of PE was 33 %. The rates of PE in low, moderate, and high PE risk groups as determined according to the Wells model and the revised Geneva score were 3.7, 53,1, 100, and 14.3, 32.1, 83.3 %, respectively. ROC analysis showed that the Wells model was statistically more accurate than the Geneva score with the area under the curve (AUC) in Wells model 0.85 (95 % CI 0.762–0.936) and in Geneva score 0.73 (95 % CI 0.612–0.838). Sudden dyspnea, active malignancy, venous thromboembolism (VTE) history, estrogen therapy, deep vein thrombosis (DVT) signs, ECG changes and lower PaCO2 were significantly more frequent in PE group. All patients with PE had an increased concentration of D-dimer, and no PE were diagnosed in the group of patients with normal D-dimer. CTPA was ordered in 17 % of patients with low pre-test probability of PE according to Wells criteria and normal D-dimer. Conclusions: The Wells model is more accurate than the Geneva scoring system for the diagnosis of PE in patients admitted to a pulmonary clinic. Additional findings, such as sudden dyspnea, estrogen therapy, ECG changes and lower PaCO2, should always be incorporated in clinical assessment of PE. Adding the Wells algorithm to the clinical pathway for PE management might slightly decrease the number of CTPA.http://vestnik.szd.si/index.php/ZdravVest/article/view/310
spellingShingle Aleksander Marin
Igor Požek
Renato Eržen
Pika Meško Brguljan
Mitja Košnik
Improving diagnostics of pulmonary embolism with clinical prediction models in a clinic of pulmonary diseases
Zdravniški Vestnik
title Improving diagnostics of pulmonary embolism with clinical prediction models in a clinic of pulmonary diseases
title_full Improving diagnostics of pulmonary embolism with clinical prediction models in a clinic of pulmonary diseases
title_fullStr Improving diagnostics of pulmonary embolism with clinical prediction models in a clinic of pulmonary diseases
title_full_unstemmed Improving diagnostics of pulmonary embolism with clinical prediction models in a clinic of pulmonary diseases
title_short Improving diagnostics of pulmonary embolism with clinical prediction models in a clinic of pulmonary diseases
title_sort improving diagnostics of pulmonary embolism with clinical prediction models in a clinic of pulmonary diseases
url http://vestnik.szd.si/index.php/ZdravVest/article/view/310
work_keys_str_mv AT aleksandermarin improvingdiagnosticsofpulmonaryembolismwithclinicalpredictionmodelsinaclinicofpulmonarydiseases
AT igorpozek improvingdiagnosticsofpulmonaryembolismwithclinicalpredictionmodelsinaclinicofpulmonarydiseases
AT renatoerzen improvingdiagnosticsofpulmonaryembolismwithclinicalpredictionmodelsinaclinicofpulmonarydiseases
AT pikameskobrguljan improvingdiagnosticsofpulmonaryembolismwithclinicalpredictionmodelsinaclinicofpulmonarydiseases
AT mitjakosnik improvingdiagnosticsofpulmonaryembolismwithclinicalpredictionmodelsinaclinicofpulmonarydiseases