An exploratory test of an intuitive evaluation method of perceived argument strength
According to Mercier and Sperber (2009, 2011, 2017), people have an immediate and intuitive feeling about the strength of an argument. These intuitive evaluations are not captured by current evaluation methods of argument strength, yet they could be important to predict the extent to which people ac...
Main Authors: | Jos Hornikx, Annemarie Weerman, Hans Hoeken |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | deu |
Published: |
Seismo Verlag
2022-09-01
|
Series: | Studies in Communication Sciences |
Subjects: |
Similar Items
-
Thou Shalt Not Squander Life – Comparing Five Approaches to Argument Strength
by: Zenker Frank, et al.
Published: (2023-12-01) -
Cognitive
miserliness in argument literacy? Effects of intuitive and analytic thinking on
recognizing fallacies
by: Annika M. Svedholm-Häkkinen, et al.
Published: (2022-03-01) -
Cognitive miserliness in argument literacy? Effects of intuitive and analytic thinking on recognizing fallacies
by: Annika M. Svedholm-Häkkinen, et al.
Published: (2022-03-01) -
On the Kisceral Mode of Argumentation
by: Christopher Tindale
Published: (2022-09-01) -
the Open-Question Argument, the paradox of analysis, good, intuition, Kripke, Moore.
by: Hussein Waleh, et al.
Published: (2019-08-01)