Facilitating Nursing Participation in Family Centered Rounds: A Tale of Two Interventions

Abstract Patient- and family-centered rounds (PFCR) have been identified as an effective model for high-quality patient care. In 2012, the American Academy of Pediatrics published a policy statement on family-centered care recommending that physician rounds be conducted at the bedside, with the fami...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Anjali Sharma, Sandra Gage, Laura Norton, Heather Toth, Michael Weisgerber
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Association of American Medical Colleges 2013-12-01
Series:MedEdPORTAL
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mededportal.org/doi/10.15766/mep_2374-8265.9628
_version_ 1818943064552505344
author Anjali Sharma
Sandra Gage
Laura Norton
Heather Toth
Michael Weisgerber
author_facet Anjali Sharma
Sandra Gage
Laura Norton
Heather Toth
Michael Weisgerber
author_sort Anjali Sharma
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Patient- and family-centered rounds (PFCR) have been identified as an effective model for high-quality patient care. In 2012, the American Academy of Pediatrics published a policy statement on family-centered care recommending that physician rounds be conducted at the bedside, with the family and the bedside nurse present. At our institution, we have developed a comprehensive program to improve the performance quality and attendance of all participants on PFCR. This program of instruction has been coordinated for all rounds participants using an overriding theme, mascots, and mnemonic devices to highlight the desired qualities of each participant on PFCR. This publication focuses on a successful quality-improvement project that we implemented to increase nursing attendance on PFCR and provide instruction on desired behaviors. We include information about the mascots chosen at our institution for the purpose of providing an example of one possible scheme. The resource contains the tools we utilized to improve the quality and quantity of nursing participation on PFCR. The first tool is a needs assessment survey we administered to nurses to gain an understanding of nursing practice and behaviors regarding PFCR. The second tool is the format for a workshop for nurses that aims to promote discussion about and interest in PFCR, as well as to empower nurses to be successful participants on PFCR. Additionally, we demonstrate how, by using information from the nursing survey, we were able to identify and address the largest barrier to nursing attendance on PFCR. Lastly, we provide a clinical practice guideline on PFCR, which gives information on best practices relating to rounds and a flow diagram of our approach to PFCR. This clinical practice guideline includes information about the coordination of this nursing initiative with other training that has been undertaken at our institution regarding PFCR. Nurses are an important part of patient care, and their presence on rounds is essential. Our quality-improvement project successfully improved the nursing attendance on PFCR from a baseline of 47% to 80%. The workshop for nurses was very well received by the nurses, with strong ratings and positive comments.
first_indexed 2024-12-20T07:21:23Z
format Article
id doaj.art-475e2169b28d4fc6945a658a4126a149
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2374-8265
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-20T07:21:23Z
publishDate 2013-12-01
publisher Association of American Medical Colleges
record_format Article
series MedEdPORTAL
spelling doaj.art-475e2169b28d4fc6945a658a4126a1492022-12-21T19:48:40ZengAssociation of American Medical CollegesMedEdPORTAL2374-82652013-12-01910.15766/mep_2374-8265.9628Facilitating Nursing Participation in Family Centered Rounds: A Tale of Two InterventionsAnjali Sharma0Sandra Gage1Laura Norton2Heather Toth3Michael Weisgerber41 Medical College of Wisconsin2 Medical College of Wisconsin3 Medical College of Wisconsin4 Medical College of Wisconsin5 Medical College of WisconsinAbstract Patient- and family-centered rounds (PFCR) have been identified as an effective model for high-quality patient care. In 2012, the American Academy of Pediatrics published a policy statement on family-centered care recommending that physician rounds be conducted at the bedside, with the family and the bedside nurse present. At our institution, we have developed a comprehensive program to improve the performance quality and attendance of all participants on PFCR. This program of instruction has been coordinated for all rounds participants using an overriding theme, mascots, and mnemonic devices to highlight the desired qualities of each participant on PFCR. This publication focuses on a successful quality-improvement project that we implemented to increase nursing attendance on PFCR and provide instruction on desired behaviors. We include information about the mascots chosen at our institution for the purpose of providing an example of one possible scheme. The resource contains the tools we utilized to improve the quality and quantity of nursing participation on PFCR. The first tool is a needs assessment survey we administered to nurses to gain an understanding of nursing practice and behaviors regarding PFCR. The second tool is the format for a workshop for nurses that aims to promote discussion about and interest in PFCR, as well as to empower nurses to be successful participants on PFCR. Additionally, we demonstrate how, by using information from the nursing survey, we were able to identify and address the largest barrier to nursing attendance on PFCR. Lastly, we provide a clinical practice guideline on PFCR, which gives information on best practices relating to rounds and a flow diagram of our approach to PFCR. This clinical practice guideline includes information about the coordination of this nursing initiative with other training that has been undertaken at our institution regarding PFCR. Nurses are an important part of patient care, and their presence on rounds is essential. Our quality-improvement project successfully improved the nursing attendance on PFCR from a baseline of 47% to 80%. The workshop for nurses was very well received by the nurses, with strong ratings and positive comments.http://www.mededportal.org/doi/10.15766/mep_2374-8265.9628Quality ImprovementPatient and Family Centered RoundsNursing Education
spellingShingle Anjali Sharma
Sandra Gage
Laura Norton
Heather Toth
Michael Weisgerber
Facilitating Nursing Participation in Family Centered Rounds: A Tale of Two Interventions
MedEdPORTAL
Quality Improvement
Patient and Family Centered Rounds
Nursing Education
title Facilitating Nursing Participation in Family Centered Rounds: A Tale of Two Interventions
title_full Facilitating Nursing Participation in Family Centered Rounds: A Tale of Two Interventions
title_fullStr Facilitating Nursing Participation in Family Centered Rounds: A Tale of Two Interventions
title_full_unstemmed Facilitating Nursing Participation in Family Centered Rounds: A Tale of Two Interventions
title_short Facilitating Nursing Participation in Family Centered Rounds: A Tale of Two Interventions
title_sort facilitating nursing participation in family centered rounds a tale of two interventions
topic Quality Improvement
Patient and Family Centered Rounds
Nursing Education
url http://www.mededportal.org/doi/10.15766/mep_2374-8265.9628
work_keys_str_mv AT anjalisharma facilitatingnursingparticipationinfamilycenteredroundsataleoftwointerventions
AT sandragage facilitatingnursingparticipationinfamilycenteredroundsataleoftwointerventions
AT lauranorton facilitatingnursingparticipationinfamilycenteredroundsataleoftwointerventions
AT heathertoth facilitatingnursingparticipationinfamilycenteredroundsataleoftwointerventions
AT michaelweisgerber facilitatingnursingparticipationinfamilycenteredroundsataleoftwointerventions