Laser scanning reveals potential underestimation of biomass carbon in temperate forest

Abstract Quantifying climate mitigation benefits of biosphere protection or restoration requires accurate assessment of forest above‐ground biomass (AGB). This is usually estimated using tree size‐to‐mass allometric models calibrated with harvested biomass data. Using three‐dimensional laser measure...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kim Calders, Hans Verbeeck, Andrew Burt, Niall Origo, Joanne Nightingale, Yadvinder Malhi, Phil Wilkes, Pasi Raumonen, Robert G. H. Bunce, Mathias Disney
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2022-10-01
Series:Ecological Solutions and Evidence
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/2688-8319.12197
_version_ 1797976221260185600
author Kim Calders
Hans Verbeeck
Andrew Burt
Niall Origo
Joanne Nightingale
Yadvinder Malhi
Phil Wilkes
Pasi Raumonen
Robert G. H. Bunce
Mathias Disney
author_facet Kim Calders
Hans Verbeeck
Andrew Burt
Niall Origo
Joanne Nightingale
Yadvinder Malhi
Phil Wilkes
Pasi Raumonen
Robert G. H. Bunce
Mathias Disney
author_sort Kim Calders
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Quantifying climate mitigation benefits of biosphere protection or restoration requires accurate assessment of forest above‐ground biomass (AGB). This is usually estimated using tree size‐to‐mass allometric models calibrated with harvested biomass data. Using three‐dimensional laser measurements across the full range of tree size and shape in a typical UK temperate forest, we show that its AGB is 409.9 t ha−1, 1.77 times more than current allometric model estimates. This discrepancy arises partly from the bias towards small trees in allometric model calibration: 50% of AGB in this forest was in less than 7% of the largest trees (stem diameter > 53.1 cm), all larger than the trees used to calibrate the widely used allometric model. We present new empirical evidence that the fundamental assumption of tree size‐to‐mass scale‐invariance is not well‐justified for this kind of forest. This leads to substantial biases in current biomass estimates of broadleaf forests, not just in the UK, but elsewhere where the same or similar allometric models are applied, due to overdependence on non‐representative calibration data, and the departure of observed tree size‐to‐mass from simple size‐invariant relationships. We suggest that testing the underlying assumptions of allometric models more generally is an urgent priority as this has wider implications for climate mitigation through carbon sequestration. Forests currently act as a carbon sink in the UK. However, the anticipated increase in forest disturbances makes the trajectory and magnitude of this terrestrial carbon sink uncertain. We make recommendations for prioritizing measurements with better characterized uncertainty to address this issue.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T04:48:42Z
format Article
id doaj.art-47664212836d4502a5ab58322ef3a4c2
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2688-8319
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T04:48:42Z
publishDate 2022-10-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Ecological Solutions and Evidence
spelling doaj.art-47664212836d4502a5ab58322ef3a4c22022-12-27T06:06:38ZengWileyEcological Solutions and Evidence2688-83192022-10-0134n/an/a10.1002/2688-8319.12197Laser scanning reveals potential underestimation of biomass carbon in temperate forestKim Calders0Hans Verbeeck1Andrew Burt2Niall Origo3Joanne Nightingale4Yadvinder Malhi5Phil Wilkes6Pasi Raumonen7Robert G. H. Bunce8Mathias Disney9CAVElab ‐ Computational & Applied Vegetation Ecology, Department of Environment Ghent University Gent BelgiumCAVElab ‐ Computational & Applied Vegetation Ecology, Department of Environment Ghent University Gent BelgiumUCL Department of Geography London UKNational Physical Laboratory Climate and Earth Observation Group Teddington Middlesex UKNational Physical Laboratory Climate and Earth Observation Group Teddington Middlesex UKEnvironmental Change Institute, School of Geography and the Environment University of Oxford Oxford UKUCL Department of Geography London UKMathematics, Faculty of Information Technology and Communication Sciences Tampere University Tampere FinlandEstonian University of Life Science Tartu EstoniaUCL Department of Geography London UKAbstract Quantifying climate mitigation benefits of biosphere protection or restoration requires accurate assessment of forest above‐ground biomass (AGB). This is usually estimated using tree size‐to‐mass allometric models calibrated with harvested biomass data. Using three‐dimensional laser measurements across the full range of tree size and shape in a typical UK temperate forest, we show that its AGB is 409.9 t ha−1, 1.77 times more than current allometric model estimates. This discrepancy arises partly from the bias towards small trees in allometric model calibration: 50% of AGB in this forest was in less than 7% of the largest trees (stem diameter > 53.1 cm), all larger than the trees used to calibrate the widely used allometric model. We present new empirical evidence that the fundamental assumption of tree size‐to‐mass scale‐invariance is not well‐justified for this kind of forest. This leads to substantial biases in current biomass estimates of broadleaf forests, not just in the UK, but elsewhere where the same or similar allometric models are applied, due to overdependence on non‐representative calibration data, and the departure of observed tree size‐to‐mass from simple size‐invariant relationships. We suggest that testing the underlying assumptions of allometric models more generally is an urgent priority as this has wider implications for climate mitigation through carbon sequestration. Forests currently act as a carbon sink in the UK. However, the anticipated increase in forest disturbances makes the trajectory and magnitude of this terrestrial carbon sink uncertain. We make recommendations for prioritizing measurements with better characterized uncertainty to address this issue.https://doi.org/10.1002/2688-8319.12197three‐dimensional modellingallometrybiomasscarbonclimateforests
spellingShingle Kim Calders
Hans Verbeeck
Andrew Burt
Niall Origo
Joanne Nightingale
Yadvinder Malhi
Phil Wilkes
Pasi Raumonen
Robert G. H. Bunce
Mathias Disney
Laser scanning reveals potential underestimation of biomass carbon in temperate forest
Ecological Solutions and Evidence
three‐dimensional modelling
allometry
biomass
carbon
climate
forests
title Laser scanning reveals potential underestimation of biomass carbon in temperate forest
title_full Laser scanning reveals potential underestimation of biomass carbon in temperate forest
title_fullStr Laser scanning reveals potential underestimation of biomass carbon in temperate forest
title_full_unstemmed Laser scanning reveals potential underestimation of biomass carbon in temperate forest
title_short Laser scanning reveals potential underestimation of biomass carbon in temperate forest
title_sort laser scanning reveals potential underestimation of biomass carbon in temperate forest
topic three‐dimensional modelling
allometry
biomass
carbon
climate
forests
url https://doi.org/10.1002/2688-8319.12197
work_keys_str_mv AT kimcalders laserscanningrevealspotentialunderestimationofbiomasscarbonintemperateforest
AT hansverbeeck laserscanningrevealspotentialunderestimationofbiomasscarbonintemperateforest
AT andrewburt laserscanningrevealspotentialunderestimationofbiomasscarbonintemperateforest
AT niallorigo laserscanningrevealspotentialunderestimationofbiomasscarbonintemperateforest
AT joannenightingale laserscanningrevealspotentialunderestimationofbiomasscarbonintemperateforest
AT yadvindermalhi laserscanningrevealspotentialunderestimationofbiomasscarbonintemperateforest
AT philwilkes laserscanningrevealspotentialunderestimationofbiomasscarbonintemperateforest
AT pasiraumonen laserscanningrevealspotentialunderestimationofbiomasscarbonintemperateforest
AT robertghbunce laserscanningrevealspotentialunderestimationofbiomasscarbonintemperateforest
AT mathiasdisney laserscanningrevealspotentialunderestimationofbiomasscarbonintemperateforest