Prognostic impact of clinical outcome after endoscopic gastroduodenal stent placement for malignant gastric outlet obstruction: a multicenter retrospective cohort study using a time-dependent analysis
Background: Endoscopic gastroduodenal stent (GDS) placement is widely used as a safe and effective method to rapidly improve gastrointestinal symptoms of malignant gastric outlet obstruction (MGOO). While previous studies reported the utility of chemotherapy after GDS placement for prognosis improve...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
SAGE Publishing
2023-03-01
|
| Series: | Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1177/17562848231156279 |
| _version_ | 1811159299890610176 |
|---|---|
| author | Yuji Hodo Hajime Takatori Takuya Komura Yoshiro Asahina Tomoyoshi Chiba Hisashi Takabatake Kenkei Hasatani Ryuhei Nishino Masaaki Yano Yoshiko Takata Tsuyoshi Suda Haruhiko Shugo Hiroyoshi Nakanishi Kazutoshi Yamada Kazuhiro Miwa Kiichiro Kaji Masaki Nishitani Masaki Miyazawa Taro Yamashita |
| author_facet | Yuji Hodo Hajime Takatori Takuya Komura Yoshiro Asahina Tomoyoshi Chiba Hisashi Takabatake Kenkei Hasatani Ryuhei Nishino Masaaki Yano Yoshiko Takata Tsuyoshi Suda Haruhiko Shugo Hiroyoshi Nakanishi Kazutoshi Yamada Kazuhiro Miwa Kiichiro Kaji Masaki Nishitani Masaki Miyazawa Taro Yamashita |
| author_sort | Yuji Hodo |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Background: Endoscopic gastroduodenal stent (GDS) placement is widely used as a safe and effective method to rapidly improve gastrointestinal symptoms of malignant gastric outlet obstruction (MGOO). While previous studies reported the utility of chemotherapy after GDS placement for prognosis improvement, they did not fully address the issue of immortal time bias. Objectives: To examine the association between prognosis and clinical course following endoscopic GDS placement, using a time-dependent analysis. Design: Multicenter retrospective cohort study. Methods: This study included 216 MGOO patients who underwent GDS placement between April 2010 and August 2020. Data of patient baseline characteristics, including age, gender, cancer type, performance status (PS), GDS type and length, GDS placement location, gastric outlet obstruction scoring system (GOOSS) score, and history of chemotherapy before GDS were collected. The clinical course following GDS placement was evaluated by GOOSS score, stent dysfunction, cholangitis, and chemotherapy. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to identify prognostic factors after GDS placement. Stent dysfunction, post-stent cholangitis, and post-stent chemotherapy were analyzed as time-dependent covariates. Results: Mean GOOSS scores before and after GDS were 0.7 and 2.4, respectively, with significant improvement after GDS placement ( p < 0.001). The median survival time after GDS placement was 79 [95% confidence interval (CI): 68–103] days. In multivariate Cox proportional hazards model with time-dependent covariates, PS 0–1 [hazard ratio (HR): 0.55, 95% CI: 0.40–0.75; p < 0.001], ascites (HR: 1.45, 95% CI: 1.04–2.01; p = 0.028), metastasis (HR: 1.84, 95% CI: 1.31–2.58; p < 0.001), post-stent cholangitis (HR: 2.38, 95% CI: 1.37–4.15; p = 0.002), and post-stent chemotherapy (HR: 0.01, 95% CI: 0.002–0.10; p < 0.001) significantly affected prognosis after GDS placement. Conclusion: Post-stent cholangitis and tolerability to receive chemotherapy after GDS placement influenced prognosis in MGOO patients. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-10T05:39:45Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-47740c39860b46e1959e3d2263c8eace |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1756-2848 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-10T05:39:45Z |
| publishDate | 2023-03-01 |
| publisher | SAGE Publishing |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology |
| spelling | doaj.art-47740c39860b46e1959e3d2263c8eace2023-03-06T10:33:37ZengSAGE PublishingTherapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology1756-28482023-03-011610.1177/17562848231156279Prognostic impact of clinical outcome after endoscopic gastroduodenal stent placement for malignant gastric outlet obstruction: a multicenter retrospective cohort study using a time-dependent analysisYuji HodoHajime TakatoriTakuya KomuraYoshiro AsahinaTomoyoshi ChibaHisashi TakabatakeKenkei HasataniRyuhei NishinoMasaaki YanoYoshiko TakataTsuyoshi SudaHaruhiko ShugoHiroyoshi NakanishiKazutoshi YamadaKazuhiro MiwaKiichiro KajiMasaki NishitaniMasaki MiyazawaTaro YamashitaBackground: Endoscopic gastroduodenal stent (GDS) placement is widely used as a safe and effective method to rapidly improve gastrointestinal symptoms of malignant gastric outlet obstruction (MGOO). While previous studies reported the utility of chemotherapy after GDS placement for prognosis improvement, they did not fully address the issue of immortal time bias. Objectives: To examine the association between prognosis and clinical course following endoscopic GDS placement, using a time-dependent analysis. Design: Multicenter retrospective cohort study. Methods: This study included 216 MGOO patients who underwent GDS placement between April 2010 and August 2020. Data of patient baseline characteristics, including age, gender, cancer type, performance status (PS), GDS type and length, GDS placement location, gastric outlet obstruction scoring system (GOOSS) score, and history of chemotherapy before GDS were collected. The clinical course following GDS placement was evaluated by GOOSS score, stent dysfunction, cholangitis, and chemotherapy. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to identify prognostic factors after GDS placement. Stent dysfunction, post-stent cholangitis, and post-stent chemotherapy were analyzed as time-dependent covariates. Results: Mean GOOSS scores before and after GDS were 0.7 and 2.4, respectively, with significant improvement after GDS placement ( p < 0.001). The median survival time after GDS placement was 79 [95% confidence interval (CI): 68–103] days. In multivariate Cox proportional hazards model with time-dependent covariates, PS 0–1 [hazard ratio (HR): 0.55, 95% CI: 0.40–0.75; p < 0.001], ascites (HR: 1.45, 95% CI: 1.04–2.01; p = 0.028), metastasis (HR: 1.84, 95% CI: 1.31–2.58; p < 0.001), post-stent cholangitis (HR: 2.38, 95% CI: 1.37–4.15; p = 0.002), and post-stent chemotherapy (HR: 0.01, 95% CI: 0.002–0.10; p < 0.001) significantly affected prognosis after GDS placement. Conclusion: Post-stent cholangitis and tolerability to receive chemotherapy after GDS placement influenced prognosis in MGOO patients.https://doi.org/10.1177/17562848231156279 |
| spellingShingle | Yuji Hodo Hajime Takatori Takuya Komura Yoshiro Asahina Tomoyoshi Chiba Hisashi Takabatake Kenkei Hasatani Ryuhei Nishino Masaaki Yano Yoshiko Takata Tsuyoshi Suda Haruhiko Shugo Hiroyoshi Nakanishi Kazutoshi Yamada Kazuhiro Miwa Kiichiro Kaji Masaki Nishitani Masaki Miyazawa Taro Yamashita Prognostic impact of clinical outcome after endoscopic gastroduodenal stent placement for malignant gastric outlet obstruction: a multicenter retrospective cohort study using a time-dependent analysis Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology |
| title | Prognostic impact of clinical outcome after endoscopic gastroduodenal stent placement for malignant gastric outlet obstruction: a multicenter retrospective cohort study using a time-dependent analysis |
| title_full | Prognostic impact of clinical outcome after endoscopic gastroduodenal stent placement for malignant gastric outlet obstruction: a multicenter retrospective cohort study using a time-dependent analysis |
| title_fullStr | Prognostic impact of clinical outcome after endoscopic gastroduodenal stent placement for malignant gastric outlet obstruction: a multicenter retrospective cohort study using a time-dependent analysis |
| title_full_unstemmed | Prognostic impact of clinical outcome after endoscopic gastroduodenal stent placement for malignant gastric outlet obstruction: a multicenter retrospective cohort study using a time-dependent analysis |
| title_short | Prognostic impact of clinical outcome after endoscopic gastroduodenal stent placement for malignant gastric outlet obstruction: a multicenter retrospective cohort study using a time-dependent analysis |
| title_sort | prognostic impact of clinical outcome after endoscopic gastroduodenal stent placement for malignant gastric outlet obstruction a multicenter retrospective cohort study using a time dependent analysis |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1177/17562848231156279 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT yujihodo prognosticimpactofclinicaloutcomeafterendoscopicgastroduodenalstentplacementformalignantgastricoutletobstructionamulticenterretrospectivecohortstudyusingatimedependentanalysis AT hajimetakatori prognosticimpactofclinicaloutcomeafterendoscopicgastroduodenalstentplacementformalignantgastricoutletobstructionamulticenterretrospectivecohortstudyusingatimedependentanalysis AT takuyakomura prognosticimpactofclinicaloutcomeafterendoscopicgastroduodenalstentplacementformalignantgastricoutletobstructionamulticenterretrospectivecohortstudyusingatimedependentanalysis AT yoshiroasahina prognosticimpactofclinicaloutcomeafterendoscopicgastroduodenalstentplacementformalignantgastricoutletobstructionamulticenterretrospectivecohortstudyusingatimedependentanalysis AT tomoyoshichiba prognosticimpactofclinicaloutcomeafterendoscopicgastroduodenalstentplacementformalignantgastricoutletobstructionamulticenterretrospectivecohortstudyusingatimedependentanalysis AT hisashitakabatake prognosticimpactofclinicaloutcomeafterendoscopicgastroduodenalstentplacementformalignantgastricoutletobstructionamulticenterretrospectivecohortstudyusingatimedependentanalysis AT kenkeihasatani prognosticimpactofclinicaloutcomeafterendoscopicgastroduodenalstentplacementformalignantgastricoutletobstructionamulticenterretrospectivecohortstudyusingatimedependentanalysis AT ryuheinishino prognosticimpactofclinicaloutcomeafterendoscopicgastroduodenalstentplacementformalignantgastricoutletobstructionamulticenterretrospectivecohortstudyusingatimedependentanalysis AT masaakiyano prognosticimpactofclinicaloutcomeafterendoscopicgastroduodenalstentplacementformalignantgastricoutletobstructionamulticenterretrospectivecohortstudyusingatimedependentanalysis AT yoshikotakata prognosticimpactofclinicaloutcomeafterendoscopicgastroduodenalstentplacementformalignantgastricoutletobstructionamulticenterretrospectivecohortstudyusingatimedependentanalysis AT tsuyoshisuda prognosticimpactofclinicaloutcomeafterendoscopicgastroduodenalstentplacementformalignantgastricoutletobstructionamulticenterretrospectivecohortstudyusingatimedependentanalysis AT haruhikoshugo prognosticimpactofclinicaloutcomeafterendoscopicgastroduodenalstentplacementformalignantgastricoutletobstructionamulticenterretrospectivecohortstudyusingatimedependentanalysis AT hiroyoshinakanishi prognosticimpactofclinicaloutcomeafterendoscopicgastroduodenalstentplacementformalignantgastricoutletobstructionamulticenterretrospectivecohortstudyusingatimedependentanalysis AT kazutoshiyamada prognosticimpactofclinicaloutcomeafterendoscopicgastroduodenalstentplacementformalignantgastricoutletobstructionamulticenterretrospectivecohortstudyusingatimedependentanalysis AT kazuhiromiwa prognosticimpactofclinicaloutcomeafterendoscopicgastroduodenalstentplacementformalignantgastricoutletobstructionamulticenterretrospectivecohortstudyusingatimedependentanalysis AT kiichirokaji prognosticimpactofclinicaloutcomeafterendoscopicgastroduodenalstentplacementformalignantgastricoutletobstructionamulticenterretrospectivecohortstudyusingatimedependentanalysis AT masakinishitani prognosticimpactofclinicaloutcomeafterendoscopicgastroduodenalstentplacementformalignantgastricoutletobstructionamulticenterretrospectivecohortstudyusingatimedependentanalysis AT masakimiyazawa prognosticimpactofclinicaloutcomeafterendoscopicgastroduodenalstentplacementformalignantgastricoutletobstructionamulticenterretrospectivecohortstudyusingatimedependentanalysis AT taroyamashita prognosticimpactofclinicaloutcomeafterendoscopicgastroduodenalstentplacementformalignantgastricoutletobstructionamulticenterretrospectivecohortstudyusingatimedependentanalysis |