How stable are moral judgements? A longitudinal study of context dependency in attitudes towards patient responsibility
Abstract Background Whether patients' life-style should involve lower priority for treatment is a controversial question in bioethics. Less is known about clinicians' views. Aim To study how clinical doctors' attitudes to questions of patient responsibility and priority vary over time...
Main Authors: | Berit H Bringedal, Karin Isaksson Rø |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2024-03-01
|
Series: | BMC Medical Ethics |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-024-01035-x |
Similar Items
-
Guidelines and clinical priority setting during the COVID-19 pandemic – Norwegian doctors’ experiences
by: Berit H. Bringedal, et al.
Published: (2022-09-01) -
Duty to treat and perceived risk of contagion during the COVID-19 pandemic: Norwegian physicians’ perspectives and experiences—a questionnaire survey
by: Karin Isaksson Rø, et al.
Published: (2022-12-01) -
Attitudes towards priority setting in the norwegian health care system: a general population survey
by: Carl Tollef Solberg, et al.
Published: (2022-04-01) -
Ethical judgement among university accounting students : the case of prescriptive and deliberative moral reasoning behaviour /
by: 405365 Norshaipah Abdul Wahab, et al.
Published: (2002) -
Public participation: healthcare rationing in the newspaper media
by: Audun Brendbekken, et al.
Published: (2022-03-01)