Infant flow biphasic nasal continuous positive airway pressure (BP- NCPAP) vs. infant flow NCPAP for the facilitation of extubation in infants' ≤ 1,250 grams: a randomized controlled trial
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The use of mechanical ventilation is associated with lung injury in preterm infants and therefore the goal is to avoid or minimize its use. To date there is very little consensus on what is considered the "best non-invasive vent...
Main Authors: | O'Brien Karel, Campbell Craig, Brown Leanne, Wenger Lisa, Shah Vibhuti |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2012-04-01
|
Series: | BMC Pediatrics |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2431/12/43 |
Similar Items
-
Comparison of NIV-NAVA and NCPAP in facilitating extubation for very preterm infants
by: Byoung Kook Lee, et al.
Published: (2019-08-01) -
Is more NCPAP better?
by: Stradling, JR, et al.
Published: (2000) -
The Comparison of HHHFNC and NCPAP in Extremely Low-Birth-Weight Preterm Infants After Extubation: A Single-Center Randomized Controlled Trial
by: Jia Chen, et al.
Published: (2020-06-01) -
Risk Factors for Extubation Failure in Extremely Low Birth Weight Infants
by: Shih-Hsin Wang, et al.
Published: (2017-04-01) -
Analysis of Respiratory Behavior and Clinical Parameters for Successful Extubation in Premature Infants
by: Adriane Nakato, et al.
Published: (2018-09-01)