Assessing the built environment, programs, and policies that support physical activity opportunities in the rural Deep South

Disparities in physical activity (PA) exist in rural regions and prior research suggests environmental features and community resources likely contribute. It is important to identify the opportunities and barriers that influence activity to appropriately inform PA interventions in such areas. Thus,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nashira I. Brown, Lauren Stewart, Laura Q. Rogers, Mary Anne Powell, Claudia M. Hardy, Monica L. Baskin, Robert A. Oster, Maria Pisu, Wendy Demark-Wahnefried, Dori Pekmezi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2023-06-01
Series:Preventive Medicine Reports
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211335523001146
_version_ 1797827766518808576
author Nashira I. Brown
Lauren Stewart
Laura Q. Rogers
Mary Anne Powell
Claudia M. Hardy
Monica L. Baskin
Robert A. Oster
Maria Pisu
Wendy Demark-Wahnefried
Dori Pekmezi
author_facet Nashira I. Brown
Lauren Stewart
Laura Q. Rogers
Mary Anne Powell
Claudia M. Hardy
Monica L. Baskin
Robert A. Oster
Maria Pisu
Wendy Demark-Wahnefried
Dori Pekmezi
author_sort Nashira I. Brown
collection DOAJ
description Disparities in physical activity (PA) exist in rural regions and prior research suggests environmental features and community resources likely contribute. It is important to identify the opportunities and barriers that influence activity to appropriately inform PA interventions in such areas. Thus, we assessed the built environment, programs and policies related to PA opportunity in six rural Alabama counties that were purposively selected to inform a PA randomized controlled trial. Assessments were conducted August 2020-May 2021 using the Rural Active Living Assessment. Town characteristics and recreational amenities were captured using the Town Wide Assessment (TWA). PA programs and policies were examined with the Program and Policy Assessment. Walkability was evaluated using the Street Segment Assessment (SSA). Using the scoring system (0–100), the overall TWA score was 49.67 (range: 22–73), indicating few schools within walking distance (≤5 miles of the town’s center) and town-wide amenities (e.g., trails, water/recreational activities) for PA. The Program and Policy Assessment showed a paucity of programming and guidelines to support activity (overall average score of 24.67, [range: 22–73]). Only one county had a policy requiring walkways/bikeways in new public infrastructure projects. During assessment of 96 street segments, few pedestrian-friendly safety features [sidewalks (32%), crosswalks (19%), crossing signals (2%), and public lighting (21%)] were observed. Limited opportunities for PA (parks and playgrounds) were identified. Barriers such as few policies and safety features (crossing signals, speed bumps) were indicated as factors that should be addressed when developing PA interventions and informing future policy efforts.
first_indexed 2024-04-09T12:53:38Z
format Article
id doaj.art-47827606a59244f4ad12412ab351f8ae
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2211-3355
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-09T12:53:38Z
publishDate 2023-06-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Preventive Medicine Reports
spelling doaj.art-47827606a59244f4ad12412ab351f8ae2023-05-14T04:28:48ZengElsevierPreventive Medicine Reports2211-33552023-06-0133102223Assessing the built environment, programs, and policies that support physical activity opportunities in the rural Deep SouthNashira I. Brown0Lauren Stewart1Laura Q. Rogers2Mary Anne Powell3Claudia M. Hardy4Monica L. Baskin5Robert A. Oster6Maria Pisu7Wendy Demark-Wahnefried8Dori Pekmezi9Department of Health Behavior, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA; Corresponding author.Department of Health Behavior, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USADepartment of Medicine, Heersink School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, AL, USA; O’Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center at the University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USADepartment of Health Behavior, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USAO’Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center at the University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USADepartment of Medicine, Heersink School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, AL, USA; O’Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center at the University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USADepartment of Medicine, Heersink School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, AL, USA; O’Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center at the University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USADepartment of Medicine, Heersink School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, AL, USA; O’Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center at the University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USAO’Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center at the University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA; Department of Nutrition Sciences, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USADepartment of Health Behavior, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA; O’Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center at the University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USADisparities in physical activity (PA) exist in rural regions and prior research suggests environmental features and community resources likely contribute. It is important to identify the opportunities and barriers that influence activity to appropriately inform PA interventions in such areas. Thus, we assessed the built environment, programs and policies related to PA opportunity in six rural Alabama counties that were purposively selected to inform a PA randomized controlled trial. Assessments were conducted August 2020-May 2021 using the Rural Active Living Assessment. Town characteristics and recreational amenities were captured using the Town Wide Assessment (TWA). PA programs and policies were examined with the Program and Policy Assessment. Walkability was evaluated using the Street Segment Assessment (SSA). Using the scoring system (0–100), the overall TWA score was 49.67 (range: 22–73), indicating few schools within walking distance (≤5 miles of the town’s center) and town-wide amenities (e.g., trails, water/recreational activities) for PA. The Program and Policy Assessment showed a paucity of programming and guidelines to support activity (overall average score of 24.67, [range: 22–73]). Only one county had a policy requiring walkways/bikeways in new public infrastructure projects. During assessment of 96 street segments, few pedestrian-friendly safety features [sidewalks (32%), crosswalks (19%), crossing signals (2%), and public lighting (21%)] were observed. Limited opportunities for PA (parks and playgrounds) were identified. Barriers such as few policies and safety features (crossing signals, speed bumps) were indicated as factors that should be addressed when developing PA interventions and informing future policy efforts.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211335523001146Physical activityRuralHealth disparitiesChronic diseaseEnvironment
spellingShingle Nashira I. Brown
Lauren Stewart
Laura Q. Rogers
Mary Anne Powell
Claudia M. Hardy
Monica L. Baskin
Robert A. Oster
Maria Pisu
Wendy Demark-Wahnefried
Dori Pekmezi
Assessing the built environment, programs, and policies that support physical activity opportunities in the rural Deep South
Preventive Medicine Reports
Physical activity
Rural
Health disparities
Chronic disease
Environment
title Assessing the built environment, programs, and policies that support physical activity opportunities in the rural Deep South
title_full Assessing the built environment, programs, and policies that support physical activity opportunities in the rural Deep South
title_fullStr Assessing the built environment, programs, and policies that support physical activity opportunities in the rural Deep South
title_full_unstemmed Assessing the built environment, programs, and policies that support physical activity opportunities in the rural Deep South
title_short Assessing the built environment, programs, and policies that support physical activity opportunities in the rural Deep South
title_sort assessing the built environment programs and policies that support physical activity opportunities in the rural deep south
topic Physical activity
Rural
Health disparities
Chronic disease
Environment
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211335523001146
work_keys_str_mv AT nashiraibrown assessingthebuiltenvironmentprogramsandpoliciesthatsupportphysicalactivityopportunitiesintheruraldeepsouth
AT laurenstewart assessingthebuiltenvironmentprogramsandpoliciesthatsupportphysicalactivityopportunitiesintheruraldeepsouth
AT lauraqrogers assessingthebuiltenvironmentprogramsandpoliciesthatsupportphysicalactivityopportunitiesintheruraldeepsouth
AT maryannepowell assessingthebuiltenvironmentprogramsandpoliciesthatsupportphysicalactivityopportunitiesintheruraldeepsouth
AT claudiamhardy assessingthebuiltenvironmentprogramsandpoliciesthatsupportphysicalactivityopportunitiesintheruraldeepsouth
AT monicalbaskin assessingthebuiltenvironmentprogramsandpoliciesthatsupportphysicalactivityopportunitiesintheruraldeepsouth
AT robertaoster assessingthebuiltenvironmentprogramsandpoliciesthatsupportphysicalactivityopportunitiesintheruraldeepsouth
AT mariapisu assessingthebuiltenvironmentprogramsandpoliciesthatsupportphysicalactivityopportunitiesintheruraldeepsouth
AT wendydemarkwahnefried assessingthebuiltenvironmentprogramsandpoliciesthatsupportphysicalactivityopportunitiesintheruraldeepsouth
AT doripekmezi assessingthebuiltenvironmentprogramsandpoliciesthatsupportphysicalactivityopportunitiesintheruraldeepsouth