Single-port robot-assisted abdominoperineal resection: a case review of the first four experiences
Recently, abdominoperineal resection (APR) using a robot has been demonstrated in other studies. However, there has been no report on APR for rectal cancer using the single-port robot (SPR) platform. In response to this research gap, we described the clinical experience of APR using a SPR. From Apri...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Korean Society of Coloproctology
2022-02-01
|
Series: | Annals of Coloproctology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://coloproctol.org/upload/pdf/ac-2021-00395-0056.pdf |
_version_ | 1818199749277253632 |
---|---|
author | Moon Suk Choi Seong Hyeon Yun Jung Kyong Shin Yoon Ah Park Jung Wook Huh Yong Beom Cho Hee Cheol Kim Woo Yong Lee |
author_facet | Moon Suk Choi Seong Hyeon Yun Jung Kyong Shin Yoon Ah Park Jung Wook Huh Yong Beom Cho Hee Cheol Kim Woo Yong Lee |
author_sort | Moon Suk Choi |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Recently, abdominoperineal resection (APR) using a robot has been demonstrated in other studies. However, there has been no report on APR for rectal cancer using the single-port robot (SPR) platform. In response to this research gap, we described the clinical experience of APR using a SPR. From April 2019 to March 2020, APR using a SPR platform was performed in a total of 4 patients. Three patients had a transumbilical approach, and 1 patient had a transstoma site approach. The average operation time was 307 minutes, and the patient docking time to the SPR platform was 133.5 minutes. There were no complications during the operation, and no laparoscopy or open conversion. No reoperation occurred within 30 days. Mild postoperative complications occurred in 2 patients. We found that APR has safety and feasibility in surgery using an SPR platform. There was no intraoperative event and severe postoperative complications. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-12T02:26:42Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-4788cf24db5c47f689c9b3bd2b3c630d |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2287-9714 2287-9722 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-12T02:26:42Z |
publishDate | 2022-02-01 |
publisher | Korean Society of Coloproctology |
record_format | Article |
series | Annals of Coloproctology |
spelling | doaj.art-4788cf24db5c47f689c9b3bd2b3c630d2022-12-22T00:41:32ZengKorean Society of ColoproctologyAnnals of Coloproctology2287-97142287-97222022-02-01381889210.3393/ac.2021.00395.00561874Single-port robot-assisted abdominoperineal resection: a case review of the first four experiencesMoon Suk Choi0Seong Hyeon Yun1Jung Kyong Shin2Yoon Ah Park3Jung Wook Huh4Yong Beom Cho5Hee Cheol Kim6Woo Yong Lee7 Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, KoreaRecently, abdominoperineal resection (APR) using a robot has been demonstrated in other studies. However, there has been no report on APR for rectal cancer using the single-port robot (SPR) platform. In response to this research gap, we described the clinical experience of APR using a SPR. From April 2019 to March 2020, APR using a SPR platform was performed in a total of 4 patients. Three patients had a transumbilical approach, and 1 patient had a transstoma site approach. The average operation time was 307 minutes, and the patient docking time to the SPR platform was 133.5 minutes. There were no complications during the operation, and no laparoscopy or open conversion. No reoperation occurred within 30 days. Mild postoperative complications occurred in 2 patients. We found that APR has safety and feasibility in surgery using an SPR platform. There was no intraoperative event and severe postoperative complications.http://coloproctol.org/upload/pdf/ac-2021-00395-0056.pdfrectal neoplasmsproctectomyrobotic surgical procedureminimally invasive surgical procedures |
spellingShingle | Moon Suk Choi Seong Hyeon Yun Jung Kyong Shin Yoon Ah Park Jung Wook Huh Yong Beom Cho Hee Cheol Kim Woo Yong Lee Single-port robot-assisted abdominoperineal resection: a case review of the first four experiences Annals of Coloproctology rectal neoplasms proctectomy robotic surgical procedure minimally invasive surgical procedures |
title | Single-port robot-assisted abdominoperineal resection: a case review of the first four experiences |
title_full | Single-port robot-assisted abdominoperineal resection: a case review of the first four experiences |
title_fullStr | Single-port robot-assisted abdominoperineal resection: a case review of the first four experiences |
title_full_unstemmed | Single-port robot-assisted abdominoperineal resection: a case review of the first four experiences |
title_short | Single-port robot-assisted abdominoperineal resection: a case review of the first four experiences |
title_sort | single port robot assisted abdominoperineal resection a case review of the first four experiences |
topic | rectal neoplasms proctectomy robotic surgical procedure minimally invasive surgical procedures |
url | http://coloproctol.org/upload/pdf/ac-2021-00395-0056.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv | AT moonsukchoi singleportrobotassistedabdominoperinealresectionacasereviewofthefirstfourexperiences AT seonghyeonyun singleportrobotassistedabdominoperinealresectionacasereviewofthefirstfourexperiences AT jungkyongshin singleportrobotassistedabdominoperinealresectionacasereviewofthefirstfourexperiences AT yoonahpark singleportrobotassistedabdominoperinealresectionacasereviewofthefirstfourexperiences AT jungwookhuh singleportrobotassistedabdominoperinealresectionacasereviewofthefirstfourexperiences AT yongbeomcho singleportrobotassistedabdominoperinealresectionacasereviewofthefirstfourexperiences AT heecheolkim singleportrobotassistedabdominoperinealresectionacasereviewofthefirstfourexperiences AT wooyonglee singleportrobotassistedabdominoperinealresectionacasereviewofthefirstfourexperiences |