Interrater Reliability of a Tool Measuring the Quality of Nursing Triage in the Emergency Department

Introduction: Triage plays an essential role in the Emergency Department (ED), helping maintain a safe patient flow. Although assessing the quality of the triage process is crucial, to date, there has been no metrological testing of a tool measuring the quality of nursing triage. Objective: This st...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Simon Ouellet, Guy Bélanger, Mélanie Bérubé
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Réseau de recherche en interventions en sciences infirmières du Québec (RRISIQ) 2021-12-01
Series:Science of Nursing and Health Practices
Subjects:
Online Access:https://sips-snahp.ojs.umontreal.ca/index.php/sips-snahp/article/view/12
_version_ 1827320625525424128
author Simon Ouellet
Guy Bélanger
Mélanie Bérubé
author_facet Simon Ouellet
Guy Bélanger
Mélanie Bérubé
author_sort Simon Ouellet
collection DOAJ
description Introduction: Triage plays an essential role in the Emergency Department (ED), helping maintain a safe patient flow. Although assessing the quality of the triage process is crucial, to date, there has been no metrological testing of a tool measuring the quality of nursing triage. Objective: This study aimed to assess the interrater reliability of the Audit Triage Tool (ATT) in Quebec, Canada. Methods: This retrospective cohort study took place in a regional ED. Fifty triages were selected using a systematic random sampling technique with quotas of 10 triages grouped under 5 chief complaints: chest pain, abdominal pain, neurological problems, major blunt trauma and fever. A total of 4 auditors individually applied the 49 criteria of the ATT to 50 triages. The interrater reliability was measured with the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), percentage of unanimity (PU) and percentage of agreement (PA). Results: Based on the ICC, 33/49 criteria showed fair (ICC < 0.60) or poor (ICC < 0.40) interrater reliability. This number decreased to 18/49 when adding complementary statistical test: PU < 60 % or PA < 80 %. Further analyses showed that 14/23 explicit criteria reached an ICC > 0.60, comparatively to only 2/26 implicit criteria. Discussion and conclusion: Findings showed that a quarter of the ATT criteria had poor interrater reliability according to various statistical tests. Solutions to improve the reliability of the ATT, mostly regarding the implicit criteria, are needed. Finally, future methodological research on triage quality assessment should focus on a thorough validation of the ATT.
first_indexed 2024-04-25T00:49:25Z
format Article
id doaj.art-478ba9a58a95468ca9c0d82a7d281f1a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2561-7516
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-25T00:49:25Z
publishDate 2021-12-01
publisher Réseau de recherche en interventions en sciences infirmières du Québec (RRISIQ)
record_format Article
series Science of Nursing and Health Practices
spelling doaj.art-478ba9a58a95468ca9c0d82a7d281f1a2024-03-11T18:08:56ZengRéseau de recherche en interventions en sciences infirmières du Québec (RRISIQ)Science of Nursing and Health Practices2561-75162021-12-014210.7202/1086403arInterrater Reliability of a Tool Measuring the Quality of Nursing Triage in the Emergency DepartmentSimon Ouellet0Guy Bélanger1Mélanie Bérubé2Faculty of Nursing, Université Laval, Quebec, CanadaDepartment of Nursing, Université du Québec à Rimouski, Campus de Rimouski, Quebec, CanadaFaculty of Nursing, Université Laval, Scientist- University Laval Research Center (Hôpital de l’Enfant-Jésus) (Population Health and Optimal Practices Research Unit) (Trauma - Emergency - Critical Care Medicine), Quebec, Canada Introduction: Triage plays an essential role in the Emergency Department (ED), helping maintain a safe patient flow. Although assessing the quality of the triage process is crucial, to date, there has been no metrological testing of a tool measuring the quality of nursing triage. Objective: This study aimed to assess the interrater reliability of the Audit Triage Tool (ATT) in Quebec, Canada. Methods: This retrospective cohort study took place in a regional ED. Fifty triages were selected using a systematic random sampling technique with quotas of 10 triages grouped under 5 chief complaints: chest pain, abdominal pain, neurological problems, major blunt trauma and fever. A total of 4 auditors individually applied the 49 criteria of the ATT to 50 triages. The interrater reliability was measured with the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), percentage of unanimity (PU) and percentage of agreement (PA). Results: Based on the ICC, 33/49 criteria showed fair (ICC < 0.60) or poor (ICC < 0.40) interrater reliability. This number decreased to 18/49 when adding complementary statistical test: PU < 60 % or PA < 80 %. Further analyses showed that 14/23 explicit criteria reached an ICC > 0.60, comparatively to only 2/26 implicit criteria. Discussion and conclusion: Findings showed that a quarter of the ATT criteria had poor interrater reliability according to various statistical tests. Solutions to improve the reliability of the ATT, mostly regarding the implicit criteria, are needed. Finally, future methodological research on triage quality assessment should focus on a thorough validation of the ATT. https://sips-snahp.ojs.umontreal.ca/index.php/sips-snahp/article/view/12triagereliabilityquality improvementauditemergency department
spellingShingle Simon Ouellet
Guy Bélanger
Mélanie Bérubé
Interrater Reliability of a Tool Measuring the Quality of Nursing Triage in the Emergency Department
Science of Nursing and Health Practices
triage
reliability
quality improvement
audit
emergency department
title Interrater Reliability of a Tool Measuring the Quality of Nursing Triage in the Emergency Department
title_full Interrater Reliability of a Tool Measuring the Quality of Nursing Triage in the Emergency Department
title_fullStr Interrater Reliability of a Tool Measuring the Quality of Nursing Triage in the Emergency Department
title_full_unstemmed Interrater Reliability of a Tool Measuring the Quality of Nursing Triage in the Emergency Department
title_short Interrater Reliability of a Tool Measuring the Quality of Nursing Triage in the Emergency Department
title_sort interrater reliability of a tool measuring the quality of nursing triage in the emergency department
topic triage
reliability
quality improvement
audit
emergency department
url https://sips-snahp.ojs.umontreal.ca/index.php/sips-snahp/article/view/12
work_keys_str_mv AT simonouellet interraterreliabilityofatoolmeasuringthequalityofnursingtriageintheemergencydepartment
AT guybelanger interraterreliabilityofatoolmeasuringthequalityofnursingtriageintheemergencydepartment
AT melanieberube interraterreliabilityofatoolmeasuringthequalityofnursingtriageintheemergencydepartment