Radiotherapy may augment response to immunotherapy in metastatic uveal melanoma patients

Introduction: Uveal melanoma (UM) is a subtype of melanoma arising from the ocular region. Despite various local therapies available, a significant portion of patients develop distant metastases, primarily to the liver. While cutaneous melanoma is very sensitive to immunotherapy, UM is known to be l...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Shirly Grynberg, Ronen Stoff, Nethanel Asher, Ronnie Shapira-Frommer, Jacob Schachter, Ory Haisraely, Yaacov Lawrence, Guy Ben-Betzalel
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2022-10-01
Series:Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/17588359221131521
_version_ 1828304458976591872
author Shirly Grynberg
Ronen Stoff
Nethanel Asher
Ronnie Shapira-Frommer
Jacob Schachter
Ory Haisraely
Yaacov Lawrence
Guy Ben-Betzalel
author_facet Shirly Grynberg
Ronen Stoff
Nethanel Asher
Ronnie Shapira-Frommer
Jacob Schachter
Ory Haisraely
Yaacov Lawrence
Guy Ben-Betzalel
author_sort Shirly Grynberg
collection DOAJ
description Introduction: Uveal melanoma (UM) is a subtype of melanoma arising from the ocular region. Despite various local therapies available, a significant portion of patients develop distant metastases, primarily to the liver. While cutaneous melanoma is very sensitive to immunotherapy, UM is known to be less responsive and patients were excluded from pivotal clinical trials. To date, there is no standard first line therapy for metastatic UM and clinical trial participation is encouraged. While UM is considered a radio-resistant tumor, there is a role for radiotherapy (RT) as palliative treatment and possibly for immune sensitization. This a retrospective analysis aimed at addressing the role of combination checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) with RT as a synergistic treatment in metastatic UM patient. We hypothesized that concurrent RT would improve the clinical response to immunotherapy. Methods: Retrospective chart review of patients with metastatic UM treated with ICI at Ella Lemelbaum Institute between 2015 and 2021. Patients’ electronic medical records were analyzed for baseline characteristics, response rate and survival data. Patients were grouped according to receipt of concomitant RT. Study was approved by local IRB and statistical analyses done using Stata V.17 Results: Thirty-nine patients were treated with immunotherapy. Fifty percent were treated with anti-programmed cell death (PD)-1 and 50% with anti-PD1– anti CTLA4 combination therapy. Nine patients were treated concomitantly with immunotherapy and external beam RT or with stereotactic body RT (group A) and 29 patients were treated with immunotherapy alone (group B). Overall response rate was significantly higher in group A (44% versus 10%, p  = 0.004). Median progression-free survival was longer for patients in group A (22 months versus 3 m, Hazard Ratio (HR) = 0.37, p  = 0.036). Median overall survival was also longer for group A (26 months versus 7.5 m, HR = 0.34, p  = 0.03). Toxicity was comparable between the groups. Conclusions: RT may improve response to immunotherapy with ICI in metastatic UM patients and may confer an advantage in survival. Further prospective, larger studies are warranted.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T14:12:02Z
format Article
id doaj.art-478e95244ad742008c4e1ee2a6de7381
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1758-8359
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T14:12:02Z
publishDate 2022-10-01
publisher SAGE Publishing
record_format Article
series Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology
spelling doaj.art-478e95244ad742008c4e1ee2a6de73812022-12-22T02:43:46ZengSAGE PublishingTherapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology1758-83592022-10-011410.1177/17588359221131521Radiotherapy may augment response to immunotherapy in metastatic uveal melanoma patientsShirly GrynbergRonen StoffNethanel AsherRonnie Shapira-FrommerJacob SchachterOry HaisraelyYaacov LawrenceGuy Ben-BetzalelIntroduction: Uveal melanoma (UM) is a subtype of melanoma arising from the ocular region. Despite various local therapies available, a significant portion of patients develop distant metastases, primarily to the liver. While cutaneous melanoma is very sensitive to immunotherapy, UM is known to be less responsive and patients were excluded from pivotal clinical trials. To date, there is no standard first line therapy for metastatic UM and clinical trial participation is encouraged. While UM is considered a radio-resistant tumor, there is a role for radiotherapy (RT) as palliative treatment and possibly for immune sensitization. This a retrospective analysis aimed at addressing the role of combination checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) with RT as a synergistic treatment in metastatic UM patient. We hypothesized that concurrent RT would improve the clinical response to immunotherapy. Methods: Retrospective chart review of patients with metastatic UM treated with ICI at Ella Lemelbaum Institute between 2015 and 2021. Patients’ electronic medical records were analyzed for baseline characteristics, response rate and survival data. Patients were grouped according to receipt of concomitant RT. Study was approved by local IRB and statistical analyses done using Stata V.17 Results: Thirty-nine patients were treated with immunotherapy. Fifty percent were treated with anti-programmed cell death (PD)-1 and 50% with anti-PD1– anti CTLA4 combination therapy. Nine patients were treated concomitantly with immunotherapy and external beam RT or with stereotactic body RT (group A) and 29 patients were treated with immunotherapy alone (group B). Overall response rate was significantly higher in group A (44% versus 10%, p  = 0.004). Median progression-free survival was longer for patients in group A (22 months versus 3 m, Hazard Ratio (HR) = 0.37, p  = 0.036). Median overall survival was also longer for group A (26 months versus 7.5 m, HR = 0.34, p  = 0.03). Toxicity was comparable between the groups. Conclusions: RT may improve response to immunotherapy with ICI in metastatic UM patients and may confer an advantage in survival. Further prospective, larger studies are warranted.https://doi.org/10.1177/17588359221131521
spellingShingle Shirly Grynberg
Ronen Stoff
Nethanel Asher
Ronnie Shapira-Frommer
Jacob Schachter
Ory Haisraely
Yaacov Lawrence
Guy Ben-Betzalel
Radiotherapy may augment response to immunotherapy in metastatic uveal melanoma patients
Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology
title Radiotherapy may augment response to immunotherapy in metastatic uveal melanoma patients
title_full Radiotherapy may augment response to immunotherapy in metastatic uveal melanoma patients
title_fullStr Radiotherapy may augment response to immunotherapy in metastatic uveal melanoma patients
title_full_unstemmed Radiotherapy may augment response to immunotherapy in metastatic uveal melanoma patients
title_short Radiotherapy may augment response to immunotherapy in metastatic uveal melanoma patients
title_sort radiotherapy may augment response to immunotherapy in metastatic uveal melanoma patients
url https://doi.org/10.1177/17588359221131521
work_keys_str_mv AT shirlygrynberg radiotherapymayaugmentresponsetoimmunotherapyinmetastaticuvealmelanomapatients
AT ronenstoff radiotherapymayaugmentresponsetoimmunotherapyinmetastaticuvealmelanomapatients
AT nethanelasher radiotherapymayaugmentresponsetoimmunotherapyinmetastaticuvealmelanomapatients
AT ronnieshapirafrommer radiotherapymayaugmentresponsetoimmunotherapyinmetastaticuvealmelanomapatients
AT jacobschachter radiotherapymayaugmentresponsetoimmunotherapyinmetastaticuvealmelanomapatients
AT oryhaisraely radiotherapymayaugmentresponsetoimmunotherapyinmetastaticuvealmelanomapatients
AT yaacovlawrence radiotherapymayaugmentresponsetoimmunotherapyinmetastaticuvealmelanomapatients
AT guybenbetzalel radiotherapymayaugmentresponsetoimmunotherapyinmetastaticuvealmelanomapatients