Time-dependent change of relative apical longitudinal strain index in patients with wild-type transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy

Aim: This study was conducted to investigate the meaning of left ventricular (LV) apical sparing in patients with wild-type transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy (ATTRwt-CM). Methods and results: 165 patients who were diagnosed with ATTRwt-CM at Kumamoto University Hospital from January 2002 to Decem...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hiroki Usuku, Eiichiro Yamamoto, Daisuke Sueta, Momoko Noguchi, Tomohiro Fujisaki, Koichi Egashira, Mami Morioka, Takashi Komorita, Fumi Oike, Koichiro Fujisue, Shinsuke Hanatani, Yuichiro Arima, Seiji Takashio, Seitaro Oda, Hiroaki Kawano, Kenichi Matsushita, Mitsuharu Ueda, Hirotaka Matsui, Kenichi Tsujita
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2022-12-01
Series:International Journal of Cardiology: Heart & Vasculature
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352906722001956
Description
Summary:Aim: This study was conducted to investigate the meaning of left ventricular (LV) apical sparing in patients with wild-type transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy (ATTRwt-CM). Methods and results: 165 patients who were diagnosed with ATTRwt-CM at Kumamoto University Hospital from January 2002 to December 2020 and had sufficient data for two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography were enrolled. Of these, 86 patients (52 %) had LV apical sparing (relative apical longitudinal strain index (RapLSI) > 1.0). Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed the following variables were significantly associated with LV apical sparing: interventricular septal thickness in diastole (odds ratio (OR), 1.19; 95 % confidence interval (CI), 1.01–1.41; p < 0.05); E/e’ ratio (OR, 1.06; 95 % CI, 1.00–1.11; p < 0.05); and heart-to-contralateral ratio by 99mTc-labeled pyrophosphate scintigraphy (OR, 3.40; 95 % CI, 1.07–10.83; p < 0.05).Next, we compared RapLSI at the time of diagnosis with that during the follow-up period (396 days (346–458) after diagnosis) in 92 patients. RapLSI increased significantly during the follow-up period compared with RapLSI at diagnosis in the non-LV apical sparing group (0.89 ± 0.32 vs 0.74 ± 0.18, p < 0.01) but not in the LV apical sparing group (1.33 ± 0.53 vs 1.39 ± 0.45, p = 0.46). A total of 12 patients (29 %) in the non-LV apical sparing group developed LV apical sparing and 11 patients (22 %) in LV apical sparing group diminished LV apical sparing during the follow-up period. Conclusion: Approximately half of ATTRwt-CM patients did not have LV apical sparing at diagnosis. Because RapLSI in ATTRwt-CM significantly changed over time, repeated two-dimensional speckle tracking analysis is important for suspected ATTR-CM patients.
ISSN:2352-9067