Treatment effect estimation using the propensity score in clinical trials with historical control
Abstract Background Clinical trials assessing new treatment effects require a control group to compare the pure treatment effects. However, in clinical trials on regenerative medicine, rare diseases, and intractable diseases, it may be ethically difficult to assign participants to the control group....
Main Authors: | Saki Kanamori, Masahiro Takeuchi |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2024-02-01
|
Series: | BMC Medical Research Methodology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-023-02127-9 |
Similar Items
-
Random effects modelling versus logistic regression for the inclusion of cluster-level covariates in propensity score estimation: A Monte Carlo simulation and registry cohort analysis
by: Mike Du, et al.
Published: (2023-03-01) -
Paricalcitol supplementation during the first year after kidney transplantation does not affect calcification propensity score
by: Amin Ussif, et al.
Published: (2018-08-01) -
Prognostic score-based model averaging approach for propensity score estimation
by: Daijiro Kabata, et al.
Published: (2024-10-01) -
Double-adjustment in propensity score matching analysis: choosing a threshold for considering residual imbalance
by: Tri-Long Nguyen, et al.
Published: (2017-04-01) -
Comparison of methods for handling covariate missingness in propensity score estimation with a binary exposure
by: Donna L. Coffman, et al.
Published: (2020-06-01)