A double-blind placebo needle for acupuncture research
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Placebo needles that can mask acupuncture practitioners to the type of needle used have been considered almost impossible to develop until now.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>We designed a double-blind non-penetrating...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
BMC
2007-10-01
|
| Series: | BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine |
| Online Access: | http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6882/7/31 |
| _version_ | 1818255531215683584 |
|---|---|
| author | Takakura Nobuari Yajima Hiroyoshi |
| author_facet | Takakura Nobuari Yajima Hiroyoshi |
| author_sort | Takakura Nobuari |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Placebo needles that can mask acupuncture practitioners to the type of needle used have been considered almost impossible to develop until now.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>We designed a double-blind non-penetrating placebo needle, the needle tip of which simply presses against the skin, and a matched penetrating needle. The needles are encased inside an opaque guide tube and the appearance and feel of the pair are designed to be indistinguishable. To validate the masking effect for the practitioner, 10 acupuncturists each applied 23 non-penetrating needles and 17 penetrating needles to the Large Intestine-4 point. After removing each needle, they judged whether the needle was 'penetrating', 'non-penetrating' or 'unidentifiable'. For the validation of patient masking, an acupuncturist randomly applied a non-penetrating/penetrating needle pair to the bilateral Sanjiao-5 points in 60 volunteers. When both applications were completed, we asked them to write down anything that they noticed regarding the needle application and associated sensations.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The mean ± SD of correct/unidentifiable/incorrect answers given by the 10 acupuncturists were 17.0 ± 4.1/6.4 ± 3.6/16.6 ± 3.0, respectively. Regarding patient masking, none of the subjects commented in the questionnaire that they had received a non-penetrating needle. Of 60 penetrating and 60 non-penetrating needle applications, 48 (80.0%) and 25 (41.7%) applications elicited skin penetration sensation and 48 (80.0%) and 20 (33.3%) applications elicited <it>de qi</it>, respectively.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>These needles have the potential to mask both practitioners and patients from the type of needle used in acupuncture research.</p> |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-12T17:13:20Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-47c2e8a6479f46cbbd5ecbfb040f5efb |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1472-6882 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-12T17:13:20Z |
| publishDate | 2007-10-01 |
| publisher | BMC |
| record_format | Article |
| series | BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine |
| spelling | doaj.art-47c2e8a6479f46cbbd5ecbfb040f5efb2022-12-22T00:17:50ZengBMCBMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine1472-68822007-10-01713110.1186/1472-6882-7-31A double-blind placebo needle for acupuncture researchTakakura NobuariYajima Hiroyoshi<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Placebo needles that can mask acupuncture practitioners to the type of needle used have been considered almost impossible to develop until now.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>We designed a double-blind non-penetrating placebo needle, the needle tip of which simply presses against the skin, and a matched penetrating needle. The needles are encased inside an opaque guide tube and the appearance and feel of the pair are designed to be indistinguishable. To validate the masking effect for the practitioner, 10 acupuncturists each applied 23 non-penetrating needles and 17 penetrating needles to the Large Intestine-4 point. After removing each needle, they judged whether the needle was 'penetrating', 'non-penetrating' or 'unidentifiable'. For the validation of patient masking, an acupuncturist randomly applied a non-penetrating/penetrating needle pair to the bilateral Sanjiao-5 points in 60 volunteers. When both applications were completed, we asked them to write down anything that they noticed regarding the needle application and associated sensations.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The mean ± SD of correct/unidentifiable/incorrect answers given by the 10 acupuncturists were 17.0 ± 4.1/6.4 ± 3.6/16.6 ± 3.0, respectively. Regarding patient masking, none of the subjects commented in the questionnaire that they had received a non-penetrating needle. Of 60 penetrating and 60 non-penetrating needle applications, 48 (80.0%) and 25 (41.7%) applications elicited skin penetration sensation and 48 (80.0%) and 20 (33.3%) applications elicited <it>de qi</it>, respectively.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>These needles have the potential to mask both practitioners and patients from the type of needle used in acupuncture research.</p>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6882/7/31 |
| spellingShingle | Takakura Nobuari Yajima Hiroyoshi A double-blind placebo needle for acupuncture research BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine |
| title | A double-blind placebo needle for acupuncture research |
| title_full | A double-blind placebo needle for acupuncture research |
| title_fullStr | A double-blind placebo needle for acupuncture research |
| title_full_unstemmed | A double-blind placebo needle for acupuncture research |
| title_short | A double-blind placebo needle for acupuncture research |
| title_sort | double blind placebo needle for acupuncture research |
| url | http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6882/7/31 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT takakuranobuari adoubleblindplaceboneedleforacupunctureresearch AT yajimahiroyoshi adoubleblindplaceboneedleforacupunctureresearch AT takakuranobuari doubleblindplaceboneedleforacupunctureresearch AT yajimahiroyoshi doubleblindplaceboneedleforacupunctureresearch |