Comparable survival in rats with intracranial glioblastoma irradiated with single-fraction conventional radiotherapy or FLASH radiotherapy

BackgroundRadiotherapy increases survival in patients with glioblastoma. However, the prescribed dose is limited by unwanted side effects on normal tissue. Previous experimental studies have shown that FLASH radiotherapy (FLASH-RT) can reduce these side effects. Still, it is important to establish a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Emma Liljedahl, Elise Konradsson, Karin Linderfalk, Emma Gustafsson, Kristoffer Petersson, Crister Ceberg, Henrietta Nittby Redebrandt
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2024-01-01
Series:Frontiers in Oncology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2023.1309174/full
_version_ 1797348350402494464
author Emma Liljedahl
Elise Konradsson
Karin Linderfalk
Emma Gustafsson
Kristoffer Petersson
Kristoffer Petersson
Crister Ceberg
Henrietta Nittby Redebrandt
Henrietta Nittby Redebrandt
author_facet Emma Liljedahl
Elise Konradsson
Karin Linderfalk
Emma Gustafsson
Kristoffer Petersson
Kristoffer Petersson
Crister Ceberg
Henrietta Nittby Redebrandt
Henrietta Nittby Redebrandt
author_sort Emma Liljedahl
collection DOAJ
description BackgroundRadiotherapy increases survival in patients with glioblastoma. However, the prescribed dose is limited by unwanted side effects on normal tissue. Previous experimental studies have shown that FLASH radiotherapy (FLASH-RT) can reduce these side effects. Still, it is important to establish an equal anti-tumor efficacy comparing FLASH-RT to conventional radiotherapy (CONV-RT).MethodsFully immunocompetent Fischer 344 rats with the GFP-positive NS1 intracranial glioblastoma model were irradiated with CONV-RT or FLASH-RT in one fraction of 20 Gy, 25 Gy or 30 Gy. Animals were monitored for survival and acute dermal side effects. The brains were harvested upon euthanasia and tumors were examined post mortem.ResultsSurvival was significantly increased in animals irradiated with CONV-RT and FLASH-RT at 20 Gy and 25 Gy compared to control animals. The longest survival was reached in animals irradiated with FLASH-RT and CONV-RT at 25 Gy. Irradiation at 30 Gy did not lead to increased survival, despite smaller tumors. Tumor size correlated inversely with irradiation dose, both in animals treated with CONV-RT and FLASH-RT. Acute dermal side effects were mild, but only a small proportion of the animals were alive for evaluation of those side effects.ConclusionThe dose response was similar for CONV-RT and FLASH-RT in the present model. Tumor size upon the time of euthanasia correlated inversely with the irradiation dose.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T12:04:36Z
format Article
id doaj.art-47c7575fea414a93bf023e157e2e6f72
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2234-943X
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T12:04:36Z
publishDate 2024-01-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Oncology
spelling doaj.art-47c7575fea414a93bf023e157e2e6f722024-01-23T10:46:17ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Oncology2234-943X2024-01-011310.3389/fonc.2023.13091741309174Comparable survival in rats with intracranial glioblastoma irradiated with single-fraction conventional radiotherapy or FLASH radiotherapyEmma Liljedahl0Elise Konradsson1Karin Linderfalk2Emma Gustafsson3Kristoffer Petersson4Kristoffer Petersson5Crister Ceberg6Henrietta Nittby Redebrandt7Henrietta Nittby Redebrandt8The Rausing Laboratory, Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, SwedenMedical Radiation Physics, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, SwedenThe Rausing Laboratory, Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, SwedenThe Rausing Laboratory, Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, SwedenDepartment of Oncology, Medical Research Council Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United KingdomRadiation Physics, Department of Haematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, SwedenMedical Radiation Physics, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, SwedenThe Rausing Laboratory, Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, SwedenDepartment of Neurosurgery, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, SwedenBackgroundRadiotherapy increases survival in patients with glioblastoma. However, the prescribed dose is limited by unwanted side effects on normal tissue. Previous experimental studies have shown that FLASH radiotherapy (FLASH-RT) can reduce these side effects. Still, it is important to establish an equal anti-tumor efficacy comparing FLASH-RT to conventional radiotherapy (CONV-RT).MethodsFully immunocompetent Fischer 344 rats with the GFP-positive NS1 intracranial glioblastoma model were irradiated with CONV-RT or FLASH-RT in one fraction of 20 Gy, 25 Gy or 30 Gy. Animals were monitored for survival and acute dermal side effects. The brains were harvested upon euthanasia and tumors were examined post mortem.ResultsSurvival was significantly increased in animals irradiated with CONV-RT and FLASH-RT at 20 Gy and 25 Gy compared to control animals. The longest survival was reached in animals irradiated with FLASH-RT and CONV-RT at 25 Gy. Irradiation at 30 Gy did not lead to increased survival, despite smaller tumors. Tumor size correlated inversely with irradiation dose, both in animals treated with CONV-RT and FLASH-RT. Acute dermal side effects were mild, but only a small proportion of the animals were alive for evaluation of those side effects.ConclusionThe dose response was similar for CONV-RT and FLASH-RT in the present model. Tumor size upon the time of euthanasia correlated inversely with the irradiation dose.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2023.1309174/fullglioblastomaFLASH-RTCONV-RTtumor sizerat model
spellingShingle Emma Liljedahl
Elise Konradsson
Karin Linderfalk
Emma Gustafsson
Kristoffer Petersson
Kristoffer Petersson
Crister Ceberg
Henrietta Nittby Redebrandt
Henrietta Nittby Redebrandt
Comparable survival in rats with intracranial glioblastoma irradiated with single-fraction conventional radiotherapy or FLASH radiotherapy
Frontiers in Oncology
glioblastoma
FLASH-RT
CONV-RT
tumor size
rat model
title Comparable survival in rats with intracranial glioblastoma irradiated with single-fraction conventional radiotherapy or FLASH radiotherapy
title_full Comparable survival in rats with intracranial glioblastoma irradiated with single-fraction conventional radiotherapy or FLASH radiotherapy
title_fullStr Comparable survival in rats with intracranial glioblastoma irradiated with single-fraction conventional radiotherapy or FLASH radiotherapy
title_full_unstemmed Comparable survival in rats with intracranial glioblastoma irradiated with single-fraction conventional radiotherapy or FLASH radiotherapy
title_short Comparable survival in rats with intracranial glioblastoma irradiated with single-fraction conventional radiotherapy or FLASH radiotherapy
title_sort comparable survival in rats with intracranial glioblastoma irradiated with single fraction conventional radiotherapy or flash radiotherapy
topic glioblastoma
FLASH-RT
CONV-RT
tumor size
rat model
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2023.1309174/full
work_keys_str_mv AT emmaliljedahl comparablesurvivalinratswithintracranialglioblastomairradiatedwithsinglefractionconventionalradiotherapyorflashradiotherapy
AT elisekonradsson comparablesurvivalinratswithintracranialglioblastomairradiatedwithsinglefractionconventionalradiotherapyorflashradiotherapy
AT karinlinderfalk comparablesurvivalinratswithintracranialglioblastomairradiatedwithsinglefractionconventionalradiotherapyorflashradiotherapy
AT emmagustafsson comparablesurvivalinratswithintracranialglioblastomairradiatedwithsinglefractionconventionalradiotherapyorflashradiotherapy
AT kristofferpetersson comparablesurvivalinratswithintracranialglioblastomairradiatedwithsinglefractionconventionalradiotherapyorflashradiotherapy
AT kristofferpetersson comparablesurvivalinratswithintracranialglioblastomairradiatedwithsinglefractionconventionalradiotherapyorflashradiotherapy
AT cristerceberg comparablesurvivalinratswithintracranialglioblastomairradiatedwithsinglefractionconventionalradiotherapyorflashradiotherapy
AT henriettanittbyredebrandt comparablesurvivalinratswithintracranialglioblastomairradiatedwithsinglefractionconventionalradiotherapyorflashradiotherapy
AT henriettanittbyredebrandt comparablesurvivalinratswithintracranialglioblastomairradiatedwithsinglefractionconventionalradiotherapyorflashradiotherapy