Fisher–shark interactions: A loss of support for the Maldives shark sanctuary from reef fishers whose livelihoods are affected by shark depredation

Abstract Targets for protecting predatory species often fail to consider the human costs of conservation. Human–wildlife interactions can increase following conservation action and present a major ecological and socioeconomic challenge. Using semistructured interviews (n = 103), participatory mappin...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Danielle Robinson, Steven P. Newman, Mark J. Whittingham, Richard M. Francksen, M. Shiham Adam, Selina M. Stead
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2022-11-01
Series:Conservation Letters
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12912
_version_ 1797974685244194816
author Danielle Robinson
Steven P. Newman
Mark J. Whittingham
Richard M. Francksen
M. Shiham Adam
Selina M. Stead
author_facet Danielle Robinson
Steven P. Newman
Mark J. Whittingham
Richard M. Francksen
M. Shiham Adam
Selina M. Stead
author_sort Danielle Robinson
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Targets for protecting predatory species often fail to consider the human costs of conservation. Human–wildlife interactions can increase following conservation action and present a major ecological and socioeconomic challenge. Using semistructured interviews (n = 103), participatory mapping (n = 57) and Baited Remote Underwater Video Stations (50 h) we investigated fisher‐shark interactions in one of the world's principal shark sanctuaries. Seventy‐three percent of respondents reported an increase in shark depredation postsanctuary implementation. Fisher‐reported losses due to shark depredation varied significantly between fisheries and were disproportionately high for reef fishers (>21% of daily vessel earnings). This is attributed to extensive spatial overlap (55%–78%) between reef fishing activity and ecologically validated shark hotspots. We show significant correlations between perceptions of depredation and support for shark sanctuary regulations. Findings demonstrate the need to consider fisher–shark interactions in current and future conservation planning and suggest that management of depredation must be sensitive to diverging perceptions among fisher groups.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T04:23:43Z
format Article
id doaj.art-47c84473a626451bb3f8804cea5945c3
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1755-263X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T04:23:43Z
publishDate 2022-11-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Conservation Letters
spelling doaj.art-47c84473a626451bb3f8804cea5945c32022-12-30T08:28:38ZengWileyConservation Letters1755-263X2022-11-01156n/an/a10.1111/conl.12912Fisher–shark interactions: A loss of support for the Maldives shark sanctuary from reef fishers whose livelihoods are affected by shark depredationDanielle Robinson0Steven P. Newman1Mark J. Whittingham2Richard M. Francksen3M. Shiham Adam4Selina M. Stead5School of Natural and Environmental Sciences Newcastle University Newcastle upon Tyne UKBanyan Tree Marine Lab Vabbinfaru Republic of MaldivesSchool of Natural and Environmental Sciences Newcastle University Newcastle upon Tyne UKSchool of Natural and Environmental Sciences Newcastle University Newcastle upon Tyne UKInternational Pole and Line Foundation London, United Kingdom, Marine Research Centre Malé Republic of MaldivesFaculty of Environment University of Leeds Leeds UKAbstract Targets for protecting predatory species often fail to consider the human costs of conservation. Human–wildlife interactions can increase following conservation action and present a major ecological and socioeconomic challenge. Using semistructured interviews (n = 103), participatory mapping (n = 57) and Baited Remote Underwater Video Stations (50 h) we investigated fisher‐shark interactions in one of the world's principal shark sanctuaries. Seventy‐three percent of respondents reported an increase in shark depredation postsanctuary implementation. Fisher‐reported losses due to shark depredation varied significantly between fisheries and were disproportionately high for reef fishers (>21% of daily vessel earnings). This is attributed to extensive spatial overlap (55%–78%) between reef fishing activity and ecologically validated shark hotspots. We show significant correlations between perceptions of depredation and support for shark sanctuary regulations. Findings demonstrate the need to consider fisher–shark interactions in current and future conservation planning and suggest that management of depredation must be sensitive to diverging perceptions among fisher groups.https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12912coral reefsdepredationfisher livelihoodhuman–wildlife conflictperceptionsshark sanctuaries
spellingShingle Danielle Robinson
Steven P. Newman
Mark J. Whittingham
Richard M. Francksen
M. Shiham Adam
Selina M. Stead
Fisher–shark interactions: A loss of support for the Maldives shark sanctuary from reef fishers whose livelihoods are affected by shark depredation
Conservation Letters
coral reefs
depredation
fisher livelihood
human–wildlife conflict
perceptions
shark sanctuaries
title Fisher–shark interactions: A loss of support for the Maldives shark sanctuary from reef fishers whose livelihoods are affected by shark depredation
title_full Fisher–shark interactions: A loss of support for the Maldives shark sanctuary from reef fishers whose livelihoods are affected by shark depredation
title_fullStr Fisher–shark interactions: A loss of support for the Maldives shark sanctuary from reef fishers whose livelihoods are affected by shark depredation
title_full_unstemmed Fisher–shark interactions: A loss of support for the Maldives shark sanctuary from reef fishers whose livelihoods are affected by shark depredation
title_short Fisher–shark interactions: A loss of support for the Maldives shark sanctuary from reef fishers whose livelihoods are affected by shark depredation
title_sort fisher shark interactions a loss of support for the maldives shark sanctuary from reef fishers whose livelihoods are affected by shark depredation
topic coral reefs
depredation
fisher livelihood
human–wildlife conflict
perceptions
shark sanctuaries
url https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12912
work_keys_str_mv AT daniellerobinson fishersharkinteractionsalossofsupportforthemaldivessharksanctuaryfromreeffisherswhoselivelihoodsareaffectedbysharkdepredation
AT stevenpnewman fishersharkinteractionsalossofsupportforthemaldivessharksanctuaryfromreeffisherswhoselivelihoodsareaffectedbysharkdepredation
AT markjwhittingham fishersharkinteractionsalossofsupportforthemaldivessharksanctuaryfromreeffisherswhoselivelihoodsareaffectedbysharkdepredation
AT richardmfrancksen fishersharkinteractionsalossofsupportforthemaldivessharksanctuaryfromreeffisherswhoselivelihoodsareaffectedbysharkdepredation
AT mshihamadam fishersharkinteractionsalossofsupportforthemaldivessharksanctuaryfromreeffisherswhoselivelihoodsareaffectedbysharkdepredation
AT selinamstead fishersharkinteractionsalossofsupportforthemaldivessharksanctuaryfromreeffisherswhoselivelihoodsareaffectedbysharkdepredation