Vérités contradictoires en Parlement : preuve et justification des parties à la troisième chambre du parlement de Tournai

To argue in court is to set out the facts and ideas in order to convince the judge. The procedure organizes and frames the debate with the aim of revealing a judicial truth based on solid evidence provided by both parties. The judicial practices of the parliament of Tournai were no exception to this...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Jacques Lorgnier
Format: Article
Language:fra
Published: Association Clio et Themis 2021-06-01
Series:Clio@Themis
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journals.openedition.org/cliothemis/1453
_version_ 1811196133923356672
author Jacques Lorgnier
author_facet Jacques Lorgnier
author_sort Jacques Lorgnier
collection DOAJ
description To argue in court is to set out the facts and ideas in order to convince the judge. The procedure organizes and frames the debate with the aim of revealing a judicial truth based on solid evidence provided by both parties. The judicial practices of the parliament of Tournai were no exception to this rule. The aim of this article is to explore some concrete features of the argumentation by analysing the register of the third chamber of this high court of the late seventeenth century. In particular, we will examine two important litigation categories: disputes over the enjoyment of property or rights, and conflicts over the cost of church repairs.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T00:54:24Z
format Article
id doaj.art-47f19e8994794017a90ba2c59545863e
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2105-0929
language fra
last_indexed 2024-04-12T00:54:24Z
publishDate 2021-06-01
publisher Association Clio et Themis
record_format Article
series Clio@Themis
spelling doaj.art-47f19e8994794017a90ba2c59545863e2022-12-22T03:54:39ZfraAssociation Clio et ThemisClio@Themis2105-09292021-06-01810.35562/cliothemis.1453Vérités contradictoires en Parlement : preuve et justification des parties à la troisième chambre du parlement de TournaiJacques LorgnierTo argue in court is to set out the facts and ideas in order to convince the judge. The procedure organizes and frames the debate with the aim of revealing a judicial truth based on solid evidence provided by both parties. The judicial practices of the parliament of Tournai were no exception to this rule. The aim of this article is to explore some concrete features of the argumentation by analysing the register of the third chamber of this high court of the late seventeenth century. In particular, we will examine two important litigation categories: disputes over the enjoyment of property or rights, and conflicts over the cost of church repairs.http://journals.openedition.org/cliothemis/1453parliamentrule of audi alteram partemevidencebona fidespossessioncivil procedure
spellingShingle Jacques Lorgnier
Vérités contradictoires en Parlement : preuve et justification des parties à la troisième chambre du parlement de Tournai
Clio@Themis
parliament
rule of audi alteram partem
evidence
bona fides
possession
civil procedure
title Vérités contradictoires en Parlement : preuve et justification des parties à la troisième chambre du parlement de Tournai
title_full Vérités contradictoires en Parlement : preuve et justification des parties à la troisième chambre du parlement de Tournai
title_fullStr Vérités contradictoires en Parlement : preuve et justification des parties à la troisième chambre du parlement de Tournai
title_full_unstemmed Vérités contradictoires en Parlement : preuve et justification des parties à la troisième chambre du parlement de Tournai
title_short Vérités contradictoires en Parlement : preuve et justification des parties à la troisième chambre du parlement de Tournai
title_sort verites contradictoires en parlement preuve et justification des parties a la troisieme chambre du parlement de tournai
topic parliament
rule of audi alteram partem
evidence
bona fides
possession
civil procedure
url http://journals.openedition.org/cliothemis/1453
work_keys_str_mv AT jacqueslorgnier veritescontradictoiresenparlementpreuveetjustificationdespartiesalatroisiemechambreduparlementdetournai