Interactions between Nutrition and the “Ram Effect” in the Control of Ovarian Function in the Merino Ewe

We tested whether short-term nutritional supplementation (500 g lupin grain per head daily) would affect the response of ewes to the ram effect. Experiment 1 (end of non-breeding season): ewes were supplemented for either Days −6 to −1 relative to ram introduction (<i>n =</i> 24) or for...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: P. Clemens Khaiseb, Penelope A. R. Hawken, Graeme B. Martin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-02-01
Series:Animals
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/12/3/362
Description
Summary:We tested whether short-term nutritional supplementation (500 g lupin grain per head daily) would affect the response of ewes to the ram effect. Experiment 1 (end of non-breeding season): ewes were supplemented for either Days −6 to −1 relative to ram introduction (<i>n =</i> 24) or for 12 days after ram introduction (Days 11 to 22 of the ram-induced cycle; <i>n =</i> 29). Controls (<i>n =</i> 30) were not supplemented. Across all groups, 94–100% of ewes ovulated. Supplementation before ram introduction did not affect ovulation rate at the ram-induced ovulation but increased it during the ram-induced cycle (Control 1.37; supplemented 1.66; <i>p</i> < 0.05). Experiment 2 (the middle of non-breeding season): the supplement was fed for Days −5 to −1 relative to ram introduction. Again, supplementation did not increase number ovulating (Control 16/29; Supplemented 10/29) but it did increase ovulation rate at the ram-induced ovulation (Control 1.31; Supplemented 1.68; <i>p</i> < 0.05). In neither experiment did supplementation affect the frequency of short cycles. Supplementation before ram introduction did not improve the percentage of ewes ovulating or reduce the frequency of short cycles (so will not improve the synchrony of lambing). However, supplementation after ram introduction can increase prolificacy.
ISSN:2076-2615