Split-Course radiotherapy: A nonideal treatment in a nonideal patient

Background: Radical chemoradiation is the standard of care for locally advanced head-and-neck cancer. However, patients with pretreatment poor risk features exhibit a poor tolerance to these rigorous regimens and are then usually prescribed short-course palliative radiotherapy which provides symptom...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Pragyat Thakur, Bhavana Rai, Sushmita Ghoshal, Rohit Mahajan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2018-01-01
Series:Journal of Head & Neck Physicians and Surgeons
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.jhnps.org/article.asp?issn=2347-8128;year=2018;volume=6;issue=1;spage=43;epage=47;aulast=Thakur
_version_ 1811207985676943360
author Pragyat Thakur
Bhavana Rai
Sushmita Ghoshal
Rohit Mahajan
author_facet Pragyat Thakur
Bhavana Rai
Sushmita Ghoshal
Rohit Mahajan
author_sort Pragyat Thakur
collection DOAJ
description Background: Radical chemoradiation is the standard of care for locally advanced head-and-neck cancer. However, patients with pretreatment poor risk features exhibit a poor tolerance to these rigorous regimens and are then usually prescribed short-course palliative radiotherapy which provides symptomatic relief; however, survival outcomes are poor. However, a proportion of these patients may tolerate higher dose of radiation with planned treatment break which in turn may translate into improved locoregional control. Materials and Methods: Patients with histologically confirmed nonmetastatic locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of oropharynx with poor risk features, treated with split-course radiotherapy were included in this retrospective study. A dose of 35 Gy in 15# 3 weeks was initially prescribed. After planned treatment break of 2 weeks, an additional dose of 25 Gy in 10# 2 weeks was delivered. A weekly assessment of radiation reactions was performed during the treatment course, and response to the treatment was assessed clinically at 8 weeks after treatment completion and on subsequent follow-up. Survival analysis was done at median follow-up. Results: Of the 117 eligible patients, 14 (11.9%) had Stage III (with poor Karnofsky Performance Score) and 103 (88.1%) had Stage IV disease. Toxicity was observed as Grade I 80/117 (68.4%), Grade II 20/117 (17.1%), and Grade III as 17/117 (14.5%). A complete clinical response was observed in 45.3% patients at first follow-up. Patients had a median follow-up of 20 months (range 0–62 months). Median progression-free survival and overall survival were 12 and 16 months, respectively. Conclusions: This regimen can be delivered effectively and has an acceptable toxicity profile. It can be used as a treatment option in patients with poor risk pretreatment features.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T04:12:52Z
format Article
id doaj.art-47f372144b4e4efb995a6db803ee10ed
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2347-8128
2347-8128
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T04:12:52Z
publishDate 2018-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Journal of Head & Neck Physicians and Surgeons
spelling doaj.art-47f372144b4e4efb995a6db803ee10ed2022-12-22T03:48:27ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Head & Neck Physicians and Surgeons2347-81282347-81282018-01-0161434710.4103/jhnps.jhnps_33_16Split-Course radiotherapy: A nonideal treatment in a nonideal patientPragyat ThakurBhavana RaiSushmita GhoshalRohit MahajanBackground: Radical chemoradiation is the standard of care for locally advanced head-and-neck cancer. However, patients with pretreatment poor risk features exhibit a poor tolerance to these rigorous regimens and are then usually prescribed short-course palliative radiotherapy which provides symptomatic relief; however, survival outcomes are poor. However, a proportion of these patients may tolerate higher dose of radiation with planned treatment break which in turn may translate into improved locoregional control. Materials and Methods: Patients with histologically confirmed nonmetastatic locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of oropharynx with poor risk features, treated with split-course radiotherapy were included in this retrospective study. A dose of 35 Gy in 15# 3 weeks was initially prescribed. After planned treatment break of 2 weeks, an additional dose of 25 Gy in 10# 2 weeks was delivered. A weekly assessment of radiation reactions was performed during the treatment course, and response to the treatment was assessed clinically at 8 weeks after treatment completion and on subsequent follow-up. Survival analysis was done at median follow-up. Results: Of the 117 eligible patients, 14 (11.9%) had Stage III (with poor Karnofsky Performance Score) and 103 (88.1%) had Stage IV disease. Toxicity was observed as Grade I 80/117 (68.4%), Grade II 20/117 (17.1%), and Grade III as 17/117 (14.5%). A complete clinical response was observed in 45.3% patients at first follow-up. Patients had a median follow-up of 20 months (range 0–62 months). Median progression-free survival and overall survival were 12 and 16 months, respectively. Conclusions: This regimen can be delivered effectively and has an acceptable toxicity profile. It can be used as a treatment option in patients with poor risk pretreatment features.http://www.jhnps.org/article.asp?issn=2347-8128;year=2018;volume=6;issue=1;spage=43;epage=47;aulast=ThakurCarcinoma oropharynxoverall survivalprogression-free survivalsplit-course radiotherapytoxicity
spellingShingle Pragyat Thakur
Bhavana Rai
Sushmita Ghoshal
Rohit Mahajan
Split-Course radiotherapy: A nonideal treatment in a nonideal patient
Journal of Head & Neck Physicians and Surgeons
Carcinoma oropharynx
overall survival
progression-free survival
split-course radiotherapy
toxicity
title Split-Course radiotherapy: A nonideal treatment in a nonideal patient
title_full Split-Course radiotherapy: A nonideal treatment in a nonideal patient
title_fullStr Split-Course radiotherapy: A nonideal treatment in a nonideal patient
title_full_unstemmed Split-Course radiotherapy: A nonideal treatment in a nonideal patient
title_short Split-Course radiotherapy: A nonideal treatment in a nonideal patient
title_sort split course radiotherapy a nonideal treatment in a nonideal patient
topic Carcinoma oropharynx
overall survival
progression-free survival
split-course radiotherapy
toxicity
url http://www.jhnps.org/article.asp?issn=2347-8128;year=2018;volume=6;issue=1;spage=43;epage=47;aulast=Thakur
work_keys_str_mv AT pragyatthakur splitcourseradiotherapyanonidealtreatmentinanonidealpatient
AT bhavanarai splitcourseradiotherapyanonidealtreatmentinanonidealpatient
AT sushmitaghoshal splitcourseradiotherapyanonidealtreatmentinanonidealpatient
AT rohitmahajan splitcourseradiotherapyanonidealtreatmentinanonidealpatient