A puzzle form of a non-verbal intelligence test gives significantly higher performance measures in children with severe intellectual disability

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Assessment of 'potential intellectual ability' of children with severe intellectual disability (ID) is limited, as current tests designed for normal children do not maintain their interest. Thus a <it>manual puzzle &l...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Crewther Sheila G, Goharpey Nahal, Bello Katrina D, Crewther David P
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2008-08-01
Series:BMC Pediatrics
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2431/8/30
_version_ 1828258547320750080
author Crewther Sheila G
Goharpey Nahal
Bello Katrina D
Crewther David P
author_facet Crewther Sheila G
Goharpey Nahal
Bello Katrina D
Crewther David P
author_sort Crewther Sheila G
collection DOAJ
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Assessment of 'potential intellectual ability' of children with severe intellectual disability (ID) is limited, as current tests designed for normal children do not maintain their interest. Thus a <it>manual puzzle </it>version of the Raven's Coloured Progressive Matrices (RCPM) was devised to appeal to the attentional and sensory preferences and language limitations of children with ID. It was hypothesized that performance on the book and manual puzzle forms would not differ for typically developing children but that children with ID would perform better on the puzzle form.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>The first study assessed the validity of this puzzle form of the RCPM for 76 typically developing children in a test-retest crossover design, with a 3 week interval between tests. A second study tested performance and completion rate for the puzzle form compared to the book form in a sample of 164 children with ID.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>In the first study, no significant difference was found between performance on the puzzle and book forms in typically developing children, irrespective of the order of completion. The second study demonstrated a significantly higher performance and completion rate for the puzzle form compared to the book form in the ID population.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Similar performance on book and puzzle forms of the RCPM by typically developing children suggests that both forms measure the same construct. These findings suggest that the puzzle form does not require greater cognitive ability but demands sensory-motor attention and limits distraction in children with severe ID. Thus, we suggest the puzzle form of the RCPM is a more reliable measure of the non-verbal mentation of children with severe ID than the book form.</p>
first_indexed 2024-04-13T02:54:54Z
format Article
id doaj.art-47f6d166edbe4d0a9f8601cfd6ce7b32
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-2431
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T02:54:54Z
publishDate 2008-08-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Pediatrics
spelling doaj.art-47f6d166edbe4d0a9f8601cfd6ce7b322022-12-22T03:05:41ZengBMCBMC Pediatrics1471-24312008-08-01813010.1186/1471-2431-8-30A puzzle form of a non-verbal intelligence test gives significantly higher performance measures in children with severe intellectual disabilityCrewther Sheila GGoharpey NahalBello Katrina DCrewther David P<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Assessment of 'potential intellectual ability' of children with severe intellectual disability (ID) is limited, as current tests designed for normal children do not maintain their interest. Thus a <it>manual puzzle </it>version of the Raven's Coloured Progressive Matrices (RCPM) was devised to appeal to the attentional and sensory preferences and language limitations of children with ID. It was hypothesized that performance on the book and manual puzzle forms would not differ for typically developing children but that children with ID would perform better on the puzzle form.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>The first study assessed the validity of this puzzle form of the RCPM for 76 typically developing children in a test-retest crossover design, with a 3 week interval between tests. A second study tested performance and completion rate for the puzzle form compared to the book form in a sample of 164 children with ID.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>In the first study, no significant difference was found between performance on the puzzle and book forms in typically developing children, irrespective of the order of completion. The second study demonstrated a significantly higher performance and completion rate for the puzzle form compared to the book form in the ID population.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Similar performance on book and puzzle forms of the RCPM by typically developing children suggests that both forms measure the same construct. These findings suggest that the puzzle form does not require greater cognitive ability but demands sensory-motor attention and limits distraction in children with severe ID. Thus, we suggest the puzzle form of the RCPM is a more reliable measure of the non-verbal mentation of children with severe ID than the book form.</p>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2431/8/30
spellingShingle Crewther Sheila G
Goharpey Nahal
Bello Katrina D
Crewther David P
A puzzle form of a non-verbal intelligence test gives significantly higher performance measures in children with severe intellectual disability
BMC Pediatrics
title A puzzle form of a non-verbal intelligence test gives significantly higher performance measures in children with severe intellectual disability
title_full A puzzle form of a non-verbal intelligence test gives significantly higher performance measures in children with severe intellectual disability
title_fullStr A puzzle form of a non-verbal intelligence test gives significantly higher performance measures in children with severe intellectual disability
title_full_unstemmed A puzzle form of a non-verbal intelligence test gives significantly higher performance measures in children with severe intellectual disability
title_short A puzzle form of a non-verbal intelligence test gives significantly higher performance measures in children with severe intellectual disability
title_sort puzzle form of a non verbal intelligence test gives significantly higher performance measures in children with severe intellectual disability
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2431/8/30
work_keys_str_mv AT crewthersheilag apuzzleformofanonverbalintelligencetestgivessignificantlyhigherperformancemeasuresinchildrenwithsevereintellectualdisability
AT goharpeynahal apuzzleformofanonverbalintelligencetestgivessignificantlyhigherperformancemeasuresinchildrenwithsevereintellectualdisability
AT bellokatrinad apuzzleformofanonverbalintelligencetestgivessignificantlyhigherperformancemeasuresinchildrenwithsevereintellectualdisability
AT crewtherdavidp apuzzleformofanonverbalintelligencetestgivessignificantlyhigherperformancemeasuresinchildrenwithsevereintellectualdisability
AT crewthersheilag puzzleformofanonverbalintelligencetestgivessignificantlyhigherperformancemeasuresinchildrenwithsevereintellectualdisability
AT goharpeynahal puzzleformofanonverbalintelligencetestgivessignificantlyhigherperformancemeasuresinchildrenwithsevereintellectualdisability
AT bellokatrinad puzzleformofanonverbalintelligencetestgivessignificantlyhigherperformancemeasuresinchildrenwithsevereintellectualdisability
AT crewtherdavidp puzzleformofanonverbalintelligencetestgivessignificantlyhigherperformancemeasuresinchildrenwithsevereintellectualdisability