Improved risk scoring systems for colorectal cancer screening in Shanghai, China

Abstract Background An optimal risk‐scoring system enables more targeted offers for colonoscopy in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. This analysis aims to develop and validate scoring systems using parametric and non‐parametric methods for average‐risk populations. Methods Screening data of 807,695...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Wei‐Miao Wu, Kai Gu, Yi‐Hui Yang, Ping‐Ping Bao, Yang‐Ming Gong, Yan Shi, Wang‐Hong Xu, Chen Fu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2022-05-01
Series:Cancer Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.4576
_version_ 1811307497173024768
author Wei‐Miao Wu
Kai Gu
Yi‐Hui Yang
Ping‐Ping Bao
Yang‐Ming Gong
Yan Shi
Wang‐Hong Xu
Chen Fu
author_facet Wei‐Miao Wu
Kai Gu
Yi‐Hui Yang
Ping‐Ping Bao
Yang‐Ming Gong
Yan Shi
Wang‐Hong Xu
Chen Fu
author_sort Wei‐Miao Wu
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background An optimal risk‐scoring system enables more targeted offers for colonoscopy in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. This analysis aims to develop and validate scoring systems using parametric and non‐parametric methods for average‐risk populations. Methods Screening data of 807,695 subjects and 2806 detected cases in the first‐round CRC screening program in Shanghai were used to develop risk‐predictive models and scoring systems using logistic‐regression (LR) and artificial‐neural‐network (ANN) methods. Performance of established scoring systems was evaluated using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), calibration, sensitivity, specificity, number of high‐risk individuals and potential detection rates of CRC. Results Age, sex, CRC in first‐degree relatives, chronic diarrhoea, mucus or bloody stool, history of any cancer and faecal‐immunochemical‐test (FIT) results were identified as predictors for the presence of CRC. The AUC of LR‐based system was 0.642 when using risk factors only in derivation set, and increased to 0.774 by further incorporating one‐sample FIT results, and to 0.808 by including two‐sample FIT results, while those for ANN‐based systems were 0.639, 0.763 and 0.805, respectively. Better calibrations were observed for the LR‐based systems than the ANN‐based ones. Compared with the currently used initial tests, parallel use of FIT with LR‐based systems resulted in improved specificities, less demands for colonoscopy and higher detection rates of CRC, while parallel use of FIT with ANN‐based systems had higher sensitivities; incorporating FIT in the scoring systems further increased specificities, decreased colonoscopy demands and improved detection rates of CRC. Conclusions Our results indicate the potentials of LR‐based scoring systems incorporating one‐ or two‐sample FIT results for CRC mass screening. External validation is warranted for scaling‐up implementation in the Chinese population.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T09:05:22Z
format Article
id doaj.art-4803334df139445da7f06197eac78b67
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2045-7634
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T09:05:22Z
publishDate 2022-05-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Cancer Medicine
spelling doaj.art-4803334df139445da7f06197eac78b672022-12-22T02:53:00ZengWileyCancer Medicine2045-76342022-05-011191972198310.1002/cam4.4576Improved risk scoring systems for colorectal cancer screening in Shanghai, ChinaWei‐Miao Wu0Kai Gu1Yi‐Hui Yang2Ping‐Ping Bao3Yang‐Ming Gong4Yan Shi5Wang‐Hong Xu6Chen Fu7Global Health Institute School of Public Health, Fudan University Shanghai ChinaShanghai Municipal Center for Disease Control & Prevention Shanghai ChinaGlobal Health Institute School of Public Health, Fudan University Shanghai ChinaShanghai Municipal Center for Disease Control & Prevention Shanghai ChinaShanghai Municipal Center for Disease Control & Prevention Shanghai ChinaShanghai Municipal Center for Disease Control & Prevention Shanghai ChinaGlobal Health Institute School of Public Health, Fudan University Shanghai ChinaShanghai Municipal Center for Disease Control & Prevention Shanghai ChinaAbstract Background An optimal risk‐scoring system enables more targeted offers for colonoscopy in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. This analysis aims to develop and validate scoring systems using parametric and non‐parametric methods for average‐risk populations. Methods Screening data of 807,695 subjects and 2806 detected cases in the first‐round CRC screening program in Shanghai were used to develop risk‐predictive models and scoring systems using logistic‐regression (LR) and artificial‐neural‐network (ANN) methods. Performance of established scoring systems was evaluated using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), calibration, sensitivity, specificity, number of high‐risk individuals and potential detection rates of CRC. Results Age, sex, CRC in first‐degree relatives, chronic diarrhoea, mucus or bloody stool, history of any cancer and faecal‐immunochemical‐test (FIT) results were identified as predictors for the presence of CRC. The AUC of LR‐based system was 0.642 when using risk factors only in derivation set, and increased to 0.774 by further incorporating one‐sample FIT results, and to 0.808 by including two‐sample FIT results, while those for ANN‐based systems were 0.639, 0.763 and 0.805, respectively. Better calibrations were observed for the LR‐based systems than the ANN‐based ones. Compared with the currently used initial tests, parallel use of FIT with LR‐based systems resulted in improved specificities, less demands for colonoscopy and higher detection rates of CRC, while parallel use of FIT with ANN‐based systems had higher sensitivities; incorporating FIT in the scoring systems further increased specificities, decreased colonoscopy demands and improved detection rates of CRC. Conclusions Our results indicate the potentials of LR‐based scoring systems incorporating one‐ or two‐sample FIT results for CRC mass screening. External validation is warranted for scaling‐up implementation in the Chinese population.https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.4576colorectal cancerdata miningrisk modelrisk scorescreening
spellingShingle Wei‐Miao Wu
Kai Gu
Yi‐Hui Yang
Ping‐Ping Bao
Yang‐Ming Gong
Yan Shi
Wang‐Hong Xu
Chen Fu
Improved risk scoring systems for colorectal cancer screening in Shanghai, China
Cancer Medicine
colorectal cancer
data mining
risk model
risk score
screening
title Improved risk scoring systems for colorectal cancer screening in Shanghai, China
title_full Improved risk scoring systems for colorectal cancer screening in Shanghai, China
title_fullStr Improved risk scoring systems for colorectal cancer screening in Shanghai, China
title_full_unstemmed Improved risk scoring systems for colorectal cancer screening in Shanghai, China
title_short Improved risk scoring systems for colorectal cancer screening in Shanghai, China
title_sort improved risk scoring systems for colorectal cancer screening in shanghai china
topic colorectal cancer
data mining
risk model
risk score
screening
url https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.4576
work_keys_str_mv AT weimiaowu improvedriskscoringsystemsforcolorectalcancerscreeninginshanghaichina
AT kaigu improvedriskscoringsystemsforcolorectalcancerscreeninginshanghaichina
AT yihuiyang improvedriskscoringsystemsforcolorectalcancerscreeninginshanghaichina
AT pingpingbao improvedriskscoringsystemsforcolorectalcancerscreeninginshanghaichina
AT yangminggong improvedriskscoringsystemsforcolorectalcancerscreeninginshanghaichina
AT yanshi improvedriskscoringsystemsforcolorectalcancerscreeninginshanghaichina
AT wanghongxu improvedriskscoringsystemsforcolorectalcancerscreeninginshanghaichina
AT chenfu improvedriskscoringsystemsforcolorectalcancerscreeninginshanghaichina