Effects of a Partially Perforated Flooring System on Ammonia Emissions in Broiler Housing—Conflict of Objectives between Animal Welfare and Environment?

A partially (50%) perforated flooring system showed positive effects on health- and behavior-based welfare indicators without affecting production performance. Ammonia (NH<sub>3</sub>) is the most common air pollutant in poultry production, with effects on animal welfare and the environm...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Carolin Adler, Alexander J. Schmithausen, Manfred Trimborn, Sophia Heitmann, Birgit Spindler, Inga Tiemann, Nicole Kemper, Wolfgang Büscher
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-03-01
Series:Animals
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/11/3/707
_version_ 1797413513794158592
author Carolin Adler
Alexander J. Schmithausen
Manfred Trimborn
Sophia Heitmann
Birgit Spindler
Inga Tiemann
Nicole Kemper
Wolfgang Büscher
author_facet Carolin Adler
Alexander J. Schmithausen
Manfred Trimborn
Sophia Heitmann
Birgit Spindler
Inga Tiemann
Nicole Kemper
Wolfgang Büscher
author_sort Carolin Adler
collection DOAJ
description A partially (50%) perforated flooring system showed positive effects on health- and behavior-based welfare indicators without affecting production performance. Ammonia (NH<sub>3</sub>) is the most common air pollutant in poultry production, with effects on animal welfare and the environment. The objectives of animal welfare and environmental protection are often incompatible. Therefore, this study addresses the question of how a partially perforated flooring system affects NH<sub>3</sub> emissions. According to German regulations, three fattening periods were carried out with 500 Ross 308 broilers per barn (final stocking density: 39 kg m<sup>−2</sup>). The experimental barn was equipped with an elevated perforated area in the supply section, accessible by perforated ramps. The remaining area in the experimental barn and the control barn were equipped with wood shavings (600 g m<sup>−2</sup>). Besides the different floor types, management was identical. Air temperature (Temp), relative air humidity (RH), NH<sub>3</sub> concentration, and ventilation rate (VR) were measured continuously. Furthermore, dry matter (DM) content, pH, and litter quality were assessed. Towards the end of the fattening periods, the NH<sub>3</sub> emission rate (ER) of the partially perforated flooring system was higher compared with that of the littered control barn (all <i>p</i> < 0.001). This effect is mainly caused by the higher NH<sub>3</sub> concentrations, which are promoted by the lack of compaction underneath the elevated perforated area and the increase in pH value under aerobic conditions. Nevertheless, the partially perforated flooring system offers different approaches for NH<sub>3</sub> reduction that were previously not feasible, potentially contributing equally to animal welfare and environmental protection.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T05:19:02Z
format Article
id doaj.art-4832b754f7a74e8996d432f164fbdfe8
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2076-2615
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T05:19:02Z
publishDate 2021-03-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Animals
spelling doaj.art-4832b754f7a74e8996d432f164fbdfe82023-12-03T12:42:25ZengMDPI AGAnimals2076-26152021-03-0111370710.3390/ani11030707Effects of a Partially Perforated Flooring System on Ammonia Emissions in Broiler Housing—Conflict of Objectives between Animal Welfare and Environment?Carolin Adler0Alexander J. Schmithausen1Manfred Trimborn2Sophia Heitmann3Birgit Spindler4Inga Tiemann5Nicole Kemper6Wolfgang Büscher7Institute of Agricultural Engineering, University of Bonn, 53115 Bonn, GermanyCorteva Agriscience, Riedenburger Straße 7, 81677 München, GermanyInstitute of Agricultural Engineering, University of Bonn, 53115 Bonn, GermanyInstitute of Animal Hygiene, Animal Welfare and Farm Animal Behaviour, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation, 30559 Hannover, GermanyInstitute of Animal Hygiene, Animal Welfare and Farm Animal Behaviour, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation, 30559 Hannover, GermanyInstitute of Agricultural Engineering, University of Bonn, 53115 Bonn, GermanyInstitute of Animal Hygiene, Animal Welfare and Farm Animal Behaviour, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation, 30559 Hannover, GermanyInstitute of Agricultural Engineering, University of Bonn, 53115 Bonn, GermanyA partially (50%) perforated flooring system showed positive effects on health- and behavior-based welfare indicators without affecting production performance. Ammonia (NH<sub>3</sub>) is the most common air pollutant in poultry production, with effects on animal welfare and the environment. The objectives of animal welfare and environmental protection are often incompatible. Therefore, this study addresses the question of how a partially perforated flooring system affects NH<sub>3</sub> emissions. According to German regulations, three fattening periods were carried out with 500 Ross 308 broilers per barn (final stocking density: 39 kg m<sup>−2</sup>). The experimental barn was equipped with an elevated perforated area in the supply section, accessible by perforated ramps. The remaining area in the experimental barn and the control barn were equipped with wood shavings (600 g m<sup>−2</sup>). Besides the different floor types, management was identical. Air temperature (Temp), relative air humidity (RH), NH<sub>3</sub> concentration, and ventilation rate (VR) were measured continuously. Furthermore, dry matter (DM) content, pH, and litter quality were assessed. Towards the end of the fattening periods, the NH<sub>3</sub> emission rate (ER) of the partially perforated flooring system was higher compared with that of the littered control barn (all <i>p</i> < 0.001). This effect is mainly caused by the higher NH<sub>3</sub> concentrations, which are promoted by the lack of compaction underneath the elevated perforated area and the increase in pH value under aerobic conditions. Nevertheless, the partially perforated flooring system offers different approaches for NH<sub>3</sub> reduction that were previously not feasible, potentially contributing equally to animal welfare and environmental protection.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/11/3/707broiler productionalternative flooringammonia emissionsanimal welfareenvironmental impact
spellingShingle Carolin Adler
Alexander J. Schmithausen
Manfred Trimborn
Sophia Heitmann
Birgit Spindler
Inga Tiemann
Nicole Kemper
Wolfgang Büscher
Effects of a Partially Perforated Flooring System on Ammonia Emissions in Broiler Housing—Conflict of Objectives between Animal Welfare and Environment?
Animals
broiler production
alternative flooring
ammonia emissions
animal welfare
environmental impact
title Effects of a Partially Perforated Flooring System on Ammonia Emissions in Broiler Housing—Conflict of Objectives between Animal Welfare and Environment?
title_full Effects of a Partially Perforated Flooring System on Ammonia Emissions in Broiler Housing—Conflict of Objectives between Animal Welfare and Environment?
title_fullStr Effects of a Partially Perforated Flooring System on Ammonia Emissions in Broiler Housing—Conflict of Objectives between Animal Welfare and Environment?
title_full_unstemmed Effects of a Partially Perforated Flooring System on Ammonia Emissions in Broiler Housing—Conflict of Objectives between Animal Welfare and Environment?
title_short Effects of a Partially Perforated Flooring System on Ammonia Emissions in Broiler Housing—Conflict of Objectives between Animal Welfare and Environment?
title_sort effects of a partially perforated flooring system on ammonia emissions in broiler housing conflict of objectives between animal welfare and environment
topic broiler production
alternative flooring
ammonia emissions
animal welfare
environmental impact
url https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/11/3/707
work_keys_str_mv AT carolinadler effectsofapartiallyperforatedflooringsystemonammoniaemissionsinbroilerhousingconflictofobjectivesbetweenanimalwelfareandenvironment
AT alexanderjschmithausen effectsofapartiallyperforatedflooringsystemonammoniaemissionsinbroilerhousingconflictofobjectivesbetweenanimalwelfareandenvironment
AT manfredtrimborn effectsofapartiallyperforatedflooringsystemonammoniaemissionsinbroilerhousingconflictofobjectivesbetweenanimalwelfareandenvironment
AT sophiaheitmann effectsofapartiallyperforatedflooringsystemonammoniaemissionsinbroilerhousingconflictofobjectivesbetweenanimalwelfareandenvironment
AT birgitspindler effectsofapartiallyperforatedflooringsystemonammoniaemissionsinbroilerhousingconflictofobjectivesbetweenanimalwelfareandenvironment
AT ingatiemann effectsofapartiallyperforatedflooringsystemonammoniaemissionsinbroilerhousingconflictofobjectivesbetweenanimalwelfareandenvironment
AT nicolekemper effectsofapartiallyperforatedflooringsystemonammoniaemissionsinbroilerhousingconflictofobjectivesbetweenanimalwelfareandenvironment
AT wolfgangbuscher effectsofapartiallyperforatedflooringsystemonammoniaemissionsinbroilerhousingconflictofobjectivesbetweenanimalwelfareandenvironment