The 2014 presidential elections and their impact on the premier-presidential regime in Romania
First, we will demonstrate that, from an institutional perspective, Romania can labeled of premier-presidentialism regime, but the 2004 and 2009 elections have had a strong impact on the type of regime, meaning that several extra-constitutional factors led to the malfunction of the regime. Out of a...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Facultatea de Stiinte Politice, SNSPA
2015-03-01
|
| Series: | Sfera Politicii |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://www.sferapoliticii.ro/sfera/183/art15-Gavril.php |
| Summary: | First, we will demonstrate that, from an institutional perspective, Romania can labeled of premier-presidentialism regime, but the 2004 and 2009 elections have had a strong impact on the type of regime, meaning that several extra-constitutional factors led to the malfunction of the regime. Out of a total of 15 prime-minister nominations made after 1989, 8 can be considered deviations from the premier-presidential regime, their number being larger between 2004-2014 rather than in 1990-2000. The empirical analysis of the 2004-2014 period, highlighted three extra-constitutional factors that that made the premier-presidential regime be, in fact, a malfunctioning one: leadership style, crisis situations and the recent legitimacy of the president versus the parliament. By identifying the factors that influenced the regime type, we can determine some theoretical expectations following the 2014 elections. The success of a premier-presidentialism regime in Romania will be determined by the number of deviations from such a regime registered after the 2014 elections. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1221-6720 1221-6720 |