Differences in stomatal number per unit area within the same species under different micro-environmental conditions: A working hypothesis

Abstract A summary of Salisbury's (1927) work on stomata is presented here. He found, basically, that the number of stomata per unit area increased under more xerophytic conditions. This is contrary to prevalent opinion, that postulates that under more humid conditions, the number of stomata ca...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Eduardo Lleras
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia 1977-12-01
Series:Acta Amazonica
Online Access:http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0044-59671977000400473&tlng=en
_version_ 1818973539024240640
author Eduardo Lleras
author_facet Eduardo Lleras
author_sort Eduardo Lleras
collection DOAJ
description Abstract A summary of Salisbury's (1927) work on stomata is presented here. He found, basically, that the number of stomata per unit area increased under more xerophytic conditions. This is contrary to prevalent opinion, that postulates that under more humid conditions, the number of stomata can be greater, as there is less danger of dehydration. A hypothesis is presented here that can explain this: The more xerophytic the conditions, the higher the number of stomata per unit area to permit more efficient gas interchange at those times when relative humidity is high, and danger of excessive dehydration is lowest.
first_indexed 2024-12-20T15:25:46Z
format Article
id doaj.art-483a4cd734d149cb996ed4b48b29e240
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0044-5967
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-20T15:25:46Z
publishDate 1977-12-01
publisher Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia
record_format Article
series Acta Amazonica
spelling doaj.art-483a4cd734d149cb996ed4b48b29e2402022-12-21T19:35:50ZengInstituto Nacional de Pesquisas da AmazôniaActa Amazonica0044-59671977-12-017447347610.1590/1809-43921977074473Differences in stomatal number per unit area within the same species under different micro-environmental conditions: A working hypothesisEduardo LlerasAbstract A summary of Salisbury's (1927) work on stomata is presented here. He found, basically, that the number of stomata per unit area increased under more xerophytic conditions. This is contrary to prevalent opinion, that postulates that under more humid conditions, the number of stomata can be greater, as there is less danger of dehydration. A hypothesis is presented here that can explain this: The more xerophytic the conditions, the higher the number of stomata per unit area to permit more efficient gas interchange at those times when relative humidity is high, and danger of excessive dehydration is lowest.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0044-59671977000400473&tlng=en
spellingShingle Eduardo Lleras
Differences in stomatal number per unit area within the same species under different micro-environmental conditions: A working hypothesis
Acta Amazonica
title Differences in stomatal number per unit area within the same species under different micro-environmental conditions: A working hypothesis
title_full Differences in stomatal number per unit area within the same species under different micro-environmental conditions: A working hypothesis
title_fullStr Differences in stomatal number per unit area within the same species under different micro-environmental conditions: A working hypothesis
title_full_unstemmed Differences in stomatal number per unit area within the same species under different micro-environmental conditions: A working hypothesis
title_short Differences in stomatal number per unit area within the same species under different micro-environmental conditions: A working hypothesis
title_sort differences in stomatal number per unit area within the same species under different micro environmental conditions a working hypothesis
url http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0044-59671977000400473&tlng=en
work_keys_str_mv AT eduardolleras differencesinstomatalnumberperunitareawithinthesamespeciesunderdifferentmicroenvironmentalconditionsaworkinghypothesis