Biomechanical analysis of lifting on stable versus unstable surfaces—a laboratory-based proof-of-concept study

Abstract Background Many workers performing manual handling tasks suffer from musculoskeletal disorders (MSD). Previous research has identified several loading aspects associated with manual handling, but it is still unknown if lifting on an unstable surface is associated with increased biomechanica...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Wilhelmus Johannes Andreas Grooten, Edwin Billsten, Sebastian von Stedingk, Mikael Reimeringer
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2022-09-01
Series:Pilot and Feasibility Studies
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s40814-022-01157-2
_version_ 1811273574295535616
author Wilhelmus Johannes Andreas Grooten
Edwin Billsten
Sebastian von Stedingk
Mikael Reimeringer
author_facet Wilhelmus Johannes Andreas Grooten
Edwin Billsten
Sebastian von Stedingk
Mikael Reimeringer
author_sort Wilhelmus Johannes Andreas Grooten
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Many workers performing manual handling tasks suffer from musculoskeletal disorders (MSD). Previous research has identified several loading aspects associated with manual handling, but it is still unknown if lifting on an unstable surface is associated with increased biomechanical loading of different body parts. Aim This proof-of-concept study aims to study what kinematic and kinetic movement parameters, such as movement time, joint angles, torque, and muscle activity are feasible and of importance when studying the effect of lifting on surfaces with varying degrees of stability in an experimental set-up. Methods Measurements were taken during three different surface conditions: stable, slightly unstable, and unstable. The participants were instructed to lift a box from the floor and place it on a table in front of them. The weight of the box varied from 0.5 to 15.5 kg. By using a motion capture system (VICON) with 28 reflective markers placed on the participants and one on the box, one Kistler force plate for measuring force levels and center of pressure movements (CoP), and four electromyographic transmitters (EMG), we analyzed the downward and upward phases of the lifting movement, using the Friedman’s test for repeated measures. Results Statistically significant results with less joint movements in the lower and upper back were seen with increased instability during both the downward and upward phases. The decrease in trunk movements with increased instability resulted in a somewhat more flexed knee position during the movement, a lower torque in the lower back, and a decrease in CoP movements, but no differences in movement time or muscle activity in back and knee muscles. Conclusion Lifting while standing on unstable surfaces resulted in an alteration of both kinematics and kinetics parameters; however, further studies regarding whether this is an additional risk factor for developing lower back pain are needed. Muscle activity levels were not altered due to instability and due to the complexity of the measurement, and we suggest not including EMG measures in future experiments of this type.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T23:02:20Z
format Article
id doaj.art-483e0ef44007481aa3aeb57b43e4225a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2055-5784
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T23:02:20Z
publishDate 2022-09-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Pilot and Feasibility Studies
spelling doaj.art-483e0ef44007481aa3aeb57b43e4225a2022-12-22T03:13:02ZengBMCPilot and Feasibility Studies2055-57842022-09-018111610.1186/s40814-022-01157-2Biomechanical analysis of lifting on stable versus unstable surfaces—a laboratory-based proof-of-concept studyWilhelmus Johannes Andreas Grooten0Edwin Billsten1Sebastian von Stedingk2Mikael Reimeringer3Division of Physiotherapy, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska InstitutetDivision of Physiotherapy, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska InstitutetDivision of Physiotherapy, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska InstitutetDepartment of Women and Children’s Health, Karolinska InstitutetAbstract Background Many workers performing manual handling tasks suffer from musculoskeletal disorders (MSD). Previous research has identified several loading aspects associated with manual handling, but it is still unknown if lifting on an unstable surface is associated with increased biomechanical loading of different body parts. Aim This proof-of-concept study aims to study what kinematic and kinetic movement parameters, such as movement time, joint angles, torque, and muscle activity are feasible and of importance when studying the effect of lifting on surfaces with varying degrees of stability in an experimental set-up. Methods Measurements were taken during three different surface conditions: stable, slightly unstable, and unstable. The participants were instructed to lift a box from the floor and place it on a table in front of them. The weight of the box varied from 0.5 to 15.5 kg. By using a motion capture system (VICON) with 28 reflective markers placed on the participants and one on the box, one Kistler force plate for measuring force levels and center of pressure movements (CoP), and four electromyographic transmitters (EMG), we analyzed the downward and upward phases of the lifting movement, using the Friedman’s test for repeated measures. Results Statistically significant results with less joint movements in the lower and upper back were seen with increased instability during both the downward and upward phases. The decrease in trunk movements with increased instability resulted in a somewhat more flexed knee position during the movement, a lower torque in the lower back, and a decrease in CoP movements, but no differences in movement time or muscle activity in back and knee muscles. Conclusion Lifting while standing on unstable surfaces resulted in an alteration of both kinematics and kinetics parameters; however, further studies regarding whether this is an additional risk factor for developing lower back pain are needed. Muscle activity levels were not altered due to instability and due to the complexity of the measurement, and we suggest not including EMG measures in future experiments of this type.https://doi.org/10.1186/s40814-022-01157-2ElectromyographyErgonomicsKinematicsKineticsManual handlingMovement analysis
spellingShingle Wilhelmus Johannes Andreas Grooten
Edwin Billsten
Sebastian von Stedingk
Mikael Reimeringer
Biomechanical analysis of lifting on stable versus unstable surfaces—a laboratory-based proof-of-concept study
Pilot and Feasibility Studies
Electromyography
Ergonomics
Kinematics
Kinetics
Manual handling
Movement analysis
title Biomechanical analysis of lifting on stable versus unstable surfaces—a laboratory-based proof-of-concept study
title_full Biomechanical analysis of lifting on stable versus unstable surfaces—a laboratory-based proof-of-concept study
title_fullStr Biomechanical analysis of lifting on stable versus unstable surfaces—a laboratory-based proof-of-concept study
title_full_unstemmed Biomechanical analysis of lifting on stable versus unstable surfaces—a laboratory-based proof-of-concept study
title_short Biomechanical analysis of lifting on stable versus unstable surfaces—a laboratory-based proof-of-concept study
title_sort biomechanical analysis of lifting on stable versus unstable surfaces a laboratory based proof of concept study
topic Electromyography
Ergonomics
Kinematics
Kinetics
Manual handling
Movement analysis
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s40814-022-01157-2
work_keys_str_mv AT wilhelmusjohannesandreasgrooten biomechanicalanalysisofliftingonstableversusunstablesurfacesalaboratorybasedproofofconceptstudy
AT edwinbillsten biomechanicalanalysisofliftingonstableversusunstablesurfacesalaboratorybasedproofofconceptstudy
AT sebastianvonstedingk biomechanicalanalysisofliftingonstableversusunstablesurfacesalaboratorybasedproofofconceptstudy
AT mikaelreimeringer biomechanicalanalysisofliftingonstableversusunstablesurfacesalaboratorybasedproofofconceptstudy