Automated mechanical ventilation using Adaptive Support Ventilation versus conventional ventilation including ventilator length of stay, mortality, and professional social aspects of adoption of new technology
Background Automation of mechanical ventilation allows for reduction of variation in patient management and has the potential to provide increased patient safety by strict adherence to computer driven ventilator protocols. Methods A retrospective, observational study compared a group of 19...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Society of Mechanical Ventilation
2021-03-01
|
| Series: | Journal of Mechanical Ventilation |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.journalmechanicalventilation.com/automated-mechanical-ventilation-using-adaptive-support-ventilation-versus-conventional-ventilation-including-ventilator-length-of-stay-mortality-and-professional-social-aspects-of-adoption-of-new-t/ |
| _version_ | 1797817228664504320 |
|---|---|
| author | Ronald R. Sanderson Denise Whitley Christopher Batacan |
| author_facet | Ronald R. Sanderson Denise Whitley Christopher Batacan |
| author_sort | Ronald R. Sanderson |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Background
Automation of mechanical ventilation allows for reduction of variation in patient management and has the potential to provide increased patient safety by strict adherence to computer driven ventilator protocols.
Methods
A retrospective, observational study compared a group of 196 of general ICU patients managed exclusively on automated mechanical ventilation, adaptive support ventilation (ASV), to another group of 684 managed by usual, non-automated mechanical ventilation (No ASV). The data was collected in a unique access database designed to collect data for assessment of mechanical ventilation outcomes in a small medical center ICU.
Results
The length of ventilator stay was non-significant between both groups, (81.7 ± 35.2 hours) in the ASV group; vs. (94.1 ± 35.1 hours) in the No ASV. Percent mortality was significantly less in the ASV group, 8.6% compared to 27.3% in the No ASV.
Conclusion
Automated ventilation appears to be a safe ventilator strategy; however, cause effect relationships cannot be determined without further, more sophisticated studies. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-13T08:50:50Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-4845db483c2e4b29a2d1d6625172f899 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2694-0450 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-13T08:50:50Z |
| publishDate | 2021-03-01 |
| publisher | Society of Mechanical Ventilation |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Journal of Mechanical Ventilation |
| spelling | doaj.art-4845db483c2e4b29a2d1d6625172f8992023-05-29T12:39:49ZengSociety of Mechanical VentilationJournal of Mechanical Ventilation2694-04502021-03-0122485210.53097/JMV.10021Automated mechanical ventilation using Adaptive Support Ventilation versus conventional ventilation including ventilator length of stay, mortality, and professional social aspects of adoption of new technologyRonald R. SandersonDenise WhitleyChristopher BatacanBackground Automation of mechanical ventilation allows for reduction of variation in patient management and has the potential to provide increased patient safety by strict adherence to computer driven ventilator protocols. Methods A retrospective, observational study compared a group of 196 of general ICU patients managed exclusively on automated mechanical ventilation, adaptive support ventilation (ASV), to another group of 684 managed by usual, non-automated mechanical ventilation (No ASV). The data was collected in a unique access database designed to collect data for assessment of mechanical ventilation outcomes in a small medical center ICU. Results The length of ventilator stay was non-significant between both groups, (81.7 ± 35.2 hours) in the ASV group; vs. (94.1 ± 35.1 hours) in the No ASV. Percent mortality was significantly less in the ASV group, 8.6% compared to 27.3% in the No ASV. Conclusion Automated ventilation appears to be a safe ventilator strategy; however, cause effect relationships cannot be determined without further, more sophisticated studies.https://www.journalmechanicalventilation.com/automated-mechanical-ventilation-using-adaptive-support-ventilation-versus-conventional-ventilation-including-ventilator-length-of-stay-mortality-and-professional-social-aspects-of-adoption-of-new-t/closed loop ventilationasvventilation length of stay |
| spellingShingle | Ronald R. Sanderson Denise Whitley Christopher Batacan Automated mechanical ventilation using Adaptive Support Ventilation versus conventional ventilation including ventilator length of stay, mortality, and professional social aspects of adoption of new technology Journal of Mechanical Ventilation closed loop ventilation asv ventilation length of stay |
| title | Automated mechanical ventilation using Adaptive Support Ventilation versus conventional ventilation including ventilator length of stay, mortality, and professional social aspects of adoption of new technology |
| title_full | Automated mechanical ventilation using Adaptive Support Ventilation versus conventional ventilation including ventilator length of stay, mortality, and professional social aspects of adoption of new technology |
| title_fullStr | Automated mechanical ventilation using Adaptive Support Ventilation versus conventional ventilation including ventilator length of stay, mortality, and professional social aspects of adoption of new technology |
| title_full_unstemmed | Automated mechanical ventilation using Adaptive Support Ventilation versus conventional ventilation including ventilator length of stay, mortality, and professional social aspects of adoption of new technology |
| title_short | Automated mechanical ventilation using Adaptive Support Ventilation versus conventional ventilation including ventilator length of stay, mortality, and professional social aspects of adoption of new technology |
| title_sort | automated mechanical ventilation using adaptive support ventilation versus conventional ventilation including ventilator length of stay mortality and professional social aspects of adoption of new technology |
| topic | closed loop ventilation asv ventilation length of stay |
| url | https://www.journalmechanicalventilation.com/automated-mechanical-ventilation-using-adaptive-support-ventilation-versus-conventional-ventilation-including-ventilator-length-of-stay-mortality-and-professional-social-aspects-of-adoption-of-new-t/ |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT ronaldrsanderson automatedmechanicalventilationusingadaptivesupportventilationversusconventionalventilationincludingventilatorlengthofstaymortalityandprofessionalsocialaspectsofadoptionofnewtechnology AT denisewhitley automatedmechanicalventilationusingadaptivesupportventilationversusconventionalventilationincludingventilatorlengthofstaymortalityandprofessionalsocialaspectsofadoptionofnewtechnology AT christopherbatacan automatedmechanicalventilationusingadaptivesupportventilationversusconventionalventilationincludingventilatorlengthofstaymortalityandprofessionalsocialaspectsofadoptionofnewtechnology |