Government Public Relations and Social Media: Bridging the Digital Divide on People with Social Welfare Problems

This study is a public relations inquiry that aims to describe the use of social media by govern-ment public relations to bridge the digital divide that affects people with social welfare prob-lems. The research, unlike most public relations studies that by and large, focus on organiza-tional image,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sri Haryanti, Effy Zalfiana Rusfian
Format: Article
Language:Indonesian
Published: Universitas Gadjah Mada 2019-04-01
Series:JKAP (Jurnal Kebijakan dan Administrasi Publik)
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journal.ugm.ac.id/jkap/article/view/34602
_version_ 1829136154905018368
author Sri Haryanti
Effy Zalfiana Rusfian
author_facet Sri Haryanti
Effy Zalfiana Rusfian
author_sort Sri Haryanti
collection DOAJ
description This study is a public relations inquiry that aims to describe the use of social media by govern-ment public relations to bridge the digital divide that affects people with social welfare prob-lems. The research, unlike most public relations studies that by and large, focus on organiza-tional image, reputation, communication crisis, and transparency, uses the digital divide per-spective. The research uses Grunig and Hunt Public Relations model and Melvin De Fleur com-munication model perspectives to examine the communication processes that occur through government public relations social media. The research uses a qualitative descriptive approach to assess the communication conducted by informants. The results showed that government pub-lic relations communication through social media has not been fully able to bridge the digital divide, especially in rural areas. The digital divide creates three relates problems that affect the effectiveness of government communication with people that experience social welfare problem. Firstly, pattern of communication involves opinion leaders. Secondly, most feedback occurs in-directly while ideally, it should be direct. Thirdly, the flow of information takes place in either one or two steps, in contrast with the ideal, which should be in one step.
first_indexed 2024-12-14T18:36:54Z
format Article
id doaj.art-485095f2a51d4159af2d223f04e0e6fc
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0852-9213
2477-4693
language Indonesian
last_indexed 2024-12-14T18:36:54Z
publishDate 2019-04-01
publisher Universitas Gadjah Mada
record_format Article
series JKAP (Jurnal Kebijakan dan Administrasi Publik)
spelling doaj.art-485095f2a51d4159af2d223f04e0e6fc2022-12-21T22:51:35ZindUniversitas Gadjah MadaJKAP (Jurnal Kebijakan dan Administrasi Publik)0852-92132477-46932019-04-0122212814510.22146/jkap.3460222934Government Public Relations and Social Media: Bridging the Digital Divide on People with Social Welfare ProblemsSri Haryanti0Effy Zalfiana Rusfian1Faculty of Social and Political Studies, Universitas IndonesiaFaculty of Social and Political Studies, Universitas IndonesiaThis study is a public relations inquiry that aims to describe the use of social media by govern-ment public relations to bridge the digital divide that affects people with social welfare prob-lems. The research, unlike most public relations studies that by and large, focus on organiza-tional image, reputation, communication crisis, and transparency, uses the digital divide per-spective. The research uses Grunig and Hunt Public Relations model and Melvin De Fleur com-munication model perspectives to examine the communication processes that occur through government public relations social media. The research uses a qualitative descriptive approach to assess the communication conducted by informants. The results showed that government pub-lic relations communication through social media has not been fully able to bridge the digital divide, especially in rural areas. The digital divide creates three relates problems that affect the effectiveness of government communication with people that experience social welfare problem. Firstly, pattern of communication involves opinion leaders. Secondly, most feedback occurs in-directly while ideally, it should be direct. Thirdly, the flow of information takes place in either one or two steps, in contrast with the ideal, which should be in one step.https://journal.ugm.ac.id/jkap/article/view/34602communication processdigital dividegovernment’s social mediapublic relations
spellingShingle Sri Haryanti
Effy Zalfiana Rusfian
Government Public Relations and Social Media: Bridging the Digital Divide on People with Social Welfare Problems
JKAP (Jurnal Kebijakan dan Administrasi Publik)
communication process
digital divide
government’s social media
public relations
title Government Public Relations and Social Media: Bridging the Digital Divide on People with Social Welfare Problems
title_full Government Public Relations and Social Media: Bridging the Digital Divide on People with Social Welfare Problems
title_fullStr Government Public Relations and Social Media: Bridging the Digital Divide on People with Social Welfare Problems
title_full_unstemmed Government Public Relations and Social Media: Bridging the Digital Divide on People with Social Welfare Problems
title_short Government Public Relations and Social Media: Bridging the Digital Divide on People with Social Welfare Problems
title_sort government public relations and social media bridging the digital divide on people with social welfare problems
topic communication process
digital divide
government’s social media
public relations
url https://journal.ugm.ac.id/jkap/article/view/34602
work_keys_str_mv AT sriharyanti governmentpublicrelationsandsocialmediabridgingthedigitaldivideonpeoplewithsocialwelfareproblems
AT effyzalfianarusfian governmentpublicrelationsandsocialmediabridgingthedigitaldivideonpeoplewithsocialwelfareproblems