Antimicrobial resistance in Antarctica: is it still a pristine environment?

Abstract Although the rapid spread of antimicrobial resistance (AMR), particularly in relation to clinical settings, is causing concern in many regions of the globe, remote, extreme environments, such as Antarctica, are thought to be relatively free from the negative impact of human activities. In f...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: K. Hwengwere, H. Paramel Nair, K. A. Hughes, L. S. Peck, M. S. Clark, C. A. Walker
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2022-05-01
Series:Microbiome
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s40168-022-01250-x
_version_ 1818200845261471744
author K. Hwengwere
H. Paramel Nair
K. A. Hughes
L. S. Peck
M. S. Clark
C. A. Walker
author_facet K. Hwengwere
H. Paramel Nair
K. A. Hughes
L. S. Peck
M. S. Clark
C. A. Walker
author_sort K. Hwengwere
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Although the rapid spread of antimicrobial resistance (AMR), particularly in relation to clinical settings, is causing concern in many regions of the globe, remote, extreme environments, such as Antarctica, are thought to be relatively free from the negative impact of human activities. In fact, Antarctica is often perceived as the last pristine continent on Earth. Such remote regions, which are assumed to have very low levels of AMR due to limited human activity, represent potential model environments to understand the mechanisms and interactions underpinning the early stages of evolution, de novo development, acquisition and transmission of AMR. Antarctica, with its defined zones of human colonisation (centred around scientific research stations) and large populations of migratory birds and animals, also has great potential with regard to mapping and understanding the spread of early-stage zoonotic interactions. However, to date, studies of AMR in Antarctica are limited. Here, we survey the current literature focussing on the following: i) Dissection of human-introduced AMR versus naturally occurring AMR, based on the premise that multiple drug resistance and resistance to synthetic antibiotics not yet found in nature are the results of human contamination ii) The potential role of endemic wildlife in AMR spread There is clear evidence for greater concentrations of AMR around research stations, and although data show reverse zoonosis of the characteristic human gut bacteria to endemic wildlife, AMR within birds and seals appears to be very low, albeit on limited samplings. Furthermore, areas where there is little, to no, human activity still appear to be free from anthropogenically introduced AMR. However, a comprehensive assessment of AMR levels in Antarctica is virtually impossible on current data due to the wide variation in reporting standards and methodologies used and poor geographical coverage. Thus, future studies should engage directly with policymakers to promote the implementation of continent-wide AMR reporting standards. The development of such standards alongside a centralised reporting system would provide baseline data to feedback directly into wastewater treatment policies for the Antarctic Treaty Area to help preserve this relatively pristine environment. Video Abstract
first_indexed 2024-12-12T02:44:08Z
format Article
id doaj.art-48548bdc830849b0a95e4524581930ae
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2049-2618
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-12T02:44:08Z
publishDate 2022-05-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Microbiome
spelling doaj.art-48548bdc830849b0a95e4524581930ae2022-12-22T00:41:04ZengBMCMicrobiome2049-26182022-05-0110111310.1186/s40168-022-01250-xAntimicrobial resistance in Antarctica: is it still a pristine environment?K. Hwengwere0H. Paramel Nair1K. A. Hughes2L. S. Peck3M. S. Clark4C. A. Walker5School of Life Sciences, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Anglia Ruskin UniversitySchool of Life Sciences, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Anglia Ruskin UniversityBritish Antarctic Survey, Natural Environment Research CouncilBritish Antarctic Survey, Natural Environment Research CouncilBritish Antarctic Survey, Natural Environment Research CouncilSchool of Life Sciences, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Anglia Ruskin UniversityAbstract Although the rapid spread of antimicrobial resistance (AMR), particularly in relation to clinical settings, is causing concern in many regions of the globe, remote, extreme environments, such as Antarctica, are thought to be relatively free from the negative impact of human activities. In fact, Antarctica is often perceived as the last pristine continent on Earth. Such remote regions, which are assumed to have very low levels of AMR due to limited human activity, represent potential model environments to understand the mechanisms and interactions underpinning the early stages of evolution, de novo development, acquisition and transmission of AMR. Antarctica, with its defined zones of human colonisation (centred around scientific research stations) and large populations of migratory birds and animals, also has great potential with regard to mapping and understanding the spread of early-stage zoonotic interactions. However, to date, studies of AMR in Antarctica are limited. Here, we survey the current literature focussing on the following: i) Dissection of human-introduced AMR versus naturally occurring AMR, based on the premise that multiple drug resistance and resistance to synthetic antibiotics not yet found in nature are the results of human contamination ii) The potential role of endemic wildlife in AMR spread There is clear evidence for greater concentrations of AMR around research stations, and although data show reverse zoonosis of the characteristic human gut bacteria to endemic wildlife, AMR within birds and seals appears to be very low, albeit on limited samplings. Furthermore, areas where there is little, to no, human activity still appear to be free from anthropogenically introduced AMR. However, a comprehensive assessment of AMR levels in Antarctica is virtually impossible on current data due to the wide variation in reporting standards and methodologies used and poor geographical coverage. Thus, future studies should engage directly with policymakers to promote the implementation of continent-wide AMR reporting standards. The development of such standards alongside a centralised reporting system would provide baseline data to feedback directly into wastewater treatment policies for the Antarctic Treaty Area to help preserve this relatively pristine environment. Video Abstracthttps://doi.org/10.1186/s40168-022-01250-xβ-LactamEfflux pumpsAminoglycosidesHorizontal gene transferWastewater treatmentMetagenomics
spellingShingle K. Hwengwere
H. Paramel Nair
K. A. Hughes
L. S. Peck
M. S. Clark
C. A. Walker
Antimicrobial resistance in Antarctica: is it still a pristine environment?
Microbiome
β-Lactam
Efflux pumps
Aminoglycosides
Horizontal gene transfer
Wastewater treatment
Metagenomics
title Antimicrobial resistance in Antarctica: is it still a pristine environment?
title_full Antimicrobial resistance in Antarctica: is it still a pristine environment?
title_fullStr Antimicrobial resistance in Antarctica: is it still a pristine environment?
title_full_unstemmed Antimicrobial resistance in Antarctica: is it still a pristine environment?
title_short Antimicrobial resistance in Antarctica: is it still a pristine environment?
title_sort antimicrobial resistance in antarctica is it still a pristine environment
topic β-Lactam
Efflux pumps
Aminoglycosides
Horizontal gene transfer
Wastewater treatment
Metagenomics
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s40168-022-01250-x
work_keys_str_mv AT khwengwere antimicrobialresistanceinantarcticaisitstillapristineenvironment
AT hparamelnair antimicrobialresistanceinantarcticaisitstillapristineenvironment
AT kahughes antimicrobialresistanceinantarcticaisitstillapristineenvironment
AT lspeck antimicrobialresistanceinantarcticaisitstillapristineenvironment
AT msclark antimicrobialresistanceinantarcticaisitstillapristineenvironment
AT cawalker antimicrobialresistanceinantarcticaisitstillapristineenvironment