Visiting crowded places during the COVID-19 pandemic. A panel study among adult Norwegians

Non-pharmaceutical interventions, including promotion of social distancing, have been applied extensively in managing the COVID-19 pandemic. Understanding cognitive and psychological factors regulating precautionary behavior is important for future management. The present study examines the importan...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Leif Edvard Aarø, Lamprini Veneti, Øystein Vedaa, Otto R. F. Smith, Birgitte Freiesleben De Blasio, Bjarne Robberstad
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-12-01
Series:Frontiers in Public Health
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2022.1076090/full
_version_ 1811197529427017728
author Leif Edvard Aarø
Leif Edvard Aarø
Lamprini Veneti
Øystein Vedaa
Øystein Vedaa
Otto R. F. Smith
Otto R. F. Smith
Otto R. F. Smith
Birgitte Freiesleben De Blasio
Birgitte Freiesleben De Blasio
Bjarne Robberstad
author_facet Leif Edvard Aarø
Leif Edvard Aarø
Lamprini Veneti
Øystein Vedaa
Øystein Vedaa
Otto R. F. Smith
Otto R. F. Smith
Otto R. F. Smith
Birgitte Freiesleben De Blasio
Birgitte Freiesleben De Blasio
Bjarne Robberstad
author_sort Leif Edvard Aarø
collection DOAJ
description Non-pharmaceutical interventions, including promotion of social distancing, have been applied extensively in managing the COVID-19 pandemic. Understanding cognitive and psychological factors regulating precautionary behavior is important for future management. The present study examines the importance of selected factors as predictors of having visited or intended to visit crowded places. Six online questionnaire-based waves of data collection were conducted in April–October 2020 in a Norwegian panel (≥18 years). Sample size at Wave 1 was 1,400. In the present study, “Visited or intended to visit crowded places” for different types of locations were the dependent variables. Predictors included the following categories of items: Perceived response effectiveness, Self-efficacy, Vulnerability, Facilitating factors and Barriers. Data were analyzed with frequency and percentage distributions, descriptives, correlations, principal components analysis, negative binomial-, binary logistic-, and multiple linear regression, and cross-lagged panel models. Analyses of dimensionality revealed that a distinction had to be made between Grocery stores, a location visited by most, and locations visited by few (e.g., “Pub,” “Restaurants,” “Sports event”). We merged the latter set of variables into a countscore denoted as “Crowded places.” On the predictor side, 25 items were reduced to eight meanscores. Analyses of data from Wave 1 revealed a rather strong prediction of “Crowded places” and weaker associations with “Supermarket or other store for food.” Across waves, in multiple negative binomial regression models, three meanscore predictors turned out to be consistently associated with “Crowded places.” These include “Response effectiveness of individual action,” “Self-efficacy with regard to avoiding people,” and “Barriers.” In a prospective cross-lagged model, a combined Response effectiveness and Self-efficacy score (Cognition) predicted behavior (“Visited or intended to visit crowded places”) prospectively and vice versa. The results of this study suggest some potential to reduce people's visits to crowded locations during the pandemic through health education and behavior change approaches that focus on strengthening individuals' perceived response effectiveness and self-efficacy.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T01:16:21Z
format Article
id doaj.art-485aaee295934183b2e75e5b44e9f097
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2296-2565
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T01:16:21Z
publishDate 2022-12-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Public Health
spelling doaj.art-485aaee295934183b2e75e5b44e9f0972022-12-22T03:53:57ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Public Health2296-25652022-12-011010.3389/fpubh.2022.10760901076090Visiting crowded places during the COVID-19 pandemic. A panel study among adult NorwegiansLeif Edvard Aarø0Leif Edvard Aarø1Lamprini Veneti2Øystein Vedaa3Øystein Vedaa4Otto R. F. Smith5Otto R. F. Smith6Otto R. F. Smith7Birgitte Freiesleben De Blasio8Birgitte Freiesleben De Blasio9Bjarne Robberstad10Department of Health Promotion and Development, University of Bergen, Bergen, NorwayDepartment of Health Promotion, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Bergen, NorwayDepartment of Infection Control and Preparedness, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, NorwayDepartment of Health Promotion, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Bergen, NorwayDepartment of Psychosocial Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, NorwayDepartment of Health Promotion, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Bergen, NorwayCentre for Evaluation of Public Health Measures, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, NorwayDepartment of Teacher Education, NLA University College, Bergen, NorwayDepartment of Method Development and Analytics, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, NorwayDepartment of Biostatistics, Institute of Basic Medical Science, University of Oslo, Oslo, NorwaySection for Ethics and Health Economics, Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Bergen, NorwayNon-pharmaceutical interventions, including promotion of social distancing, have been applied extensively in managing the COVID-19 pandemic. Understanding cognitive and psychological factors regulating precautionary behavior is important for future management. The present study examines the importance of selected factors as predictors of having visited or intended to visit crowded places. Six online questionnaire-based waves of data collection were conducted in April–October 2020 in a Norwegian panel (≥18 years). Sample size at Wave 1 was 1,400. In the present study, “Visited or intended to visit crowded places” for different types of locations were the dependent variables. Predictors included the following categories of items: Perceived response effectiveness, Self-efficacy, Vulnerability, Facilitating factors and Barriers. Data were analyzed with frequency and percentage distributions, descriptives, correlations, principal components analysis, negative binomial-, binary logistic-, and multiple linear regression, and cross-lagged panel models. Analyses of dimensionality revealed that a distinction had to be made between Grocery stores, a location visited by most, and locations visited by few (e.g., “Pub,” “Restaurants,” “Sports event”). We merged the latter set of variables into a countscore denoted as “Crowded places.” On the predictor side, 25 items were reduced to eight meanscores. Analyses of data from Wave 1 revealed a rather strong prediction of “Crowded places” and weaker associations with “Supermarket or other store for food.” Across waves, in multiple negative binomial regression models, three meanscore predictors turned out to be consistently associated with “Crowded places.” These include “Response effectiveness of individual action,” “Self-efficacy with regard to avoiding people,” and “Barriers.” In a prospective cross-lagged model, a combined Response effectiveness and Self-efficacy score (Cognition) predicted behavior (“Visited or intended to visit crowded places”) prospectively and vice versa. The results of this study suggest some potential to reduce people's visits to crowded locations during the pandemic through health education and behavior change approaches that focus on strengthening individuals' perceived response effectiveness and self-efficacy.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2022.1076090/fullCOVID-19panel studycross-lagged modelscrowded placesresponse effectivenessself-efficacy
spellingShingle Leif Edvard Aarø
Leif Edvard Aarø
Lamprini Veneti
Øystein Vedaa
Øystein Vedaa
Otto R. F. Smith
Otto R. F. Smith
Otto R. F. Smith
Birgitte Freiesleben De Blasio
Birgitte Freiesleben De Blasio
Bjarne Robberstad
Visiting crowded places during the COVID-19 pandemic. A panel study among adult Norwegians
Frontiers in Public Health
COVID-19
panel study
cross-lagged models
crowded places
response effectiveness
self-efficacy
title Visiting crowded places during the COVID-19 pandemic. A panel study among adult Norwegians
title_full Visiting crowded places during the COVID-19 pandemic. A panel study among adult Norwegians
title_fullStr Visiting crowded places during the COVID-19 pandemic. A panel study among adult Norwegians
title_full_unstemmed Visiting crowded places during the COVID-19 pandemic. A panel study among adult Norwegians
title_short Visiting crowded places during the COVID-19 pandemic. A panel study among adult Norwegians
title_sort visiting crowded places during the covid 19 pandemic a panel study among adult norwegians
topic COVID-19
panel study
cross-lagged models
crowded places
response effectiveness
self-efficacy
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2022.1076090/full
work_keys_str_mv AT leifedvardaarø visitingcrowdedplacesduringthecovid19pandemicapanelstudyamongadultnorwegians
AT leifedvardaarø visitingcrowdedplacesduringthecovid19pandemicapanelstudyamongadultnorwegians
AT lampriniveneti visitingcrowdedplacesduringthecovid19pandemicapanelstudyamongadultnorwegians
AT øysteinvedaa visitingcrowdedplacesduringthecovid19pandemicapanelstudyamongadultnorwegians
AT øysteinvedaa visitingcrowdedplacesduringthecovid19pandemicapanelstudyamongadultnorwegians
AT ottorfsmith visitingcrowdedplacesduringthecovid19pandemicapanelstudyamongadultnorwegians
AT ottorfsmith visitingcrowdedplacesduringthecovid19pandemicapanelstudyamongadultnorwegians
AT ottorfsmith visitingcrowdedplacesduringthecovid19pandemicapanelstudyamongadultnorwegians
AT birgittefreieslebendeblasio visitingcrowdedplacesduringthecovid19pandemicapanelstudyamongadultnorwegians
AT birgittefreieslebendeblasio visitingcrowdedplacesduringthecovid19pandemicapanelstudyamongadultnorwegians
AT bjarnerobberstad visitingcrowdedplacesduringthecovid19pandemicapanelstudyamongadultnorwegians