Inter-Trial Formant Variability in Speech Production Is Actively Controlled but Does Not Affect Subsequent Adaptation to a Predictable Formant Perturbation

Despite ample evidence that speech production is associated with extensive trial-to-trial variability, it remains unclear whether this variability represents merely unwanted system noise or an actively regulated mechanism that is fundamental for maintaining and adapting accurate speech movements. Re...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hantao Wang, Ludo Max
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-07-01
Series:Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnhum.2022.890065/full
_version_ 1818535575173464064
author Hantao Wang
Ludo Max
Ludo Max
author_facet Hantao Wang
Ludo Max
Ludo Max
author_sort Hantao Wang
collection DOAJ
description Despite ample evidence that speech production is associated with extensive trial-to-trial variability, it remains unclear whether this variability represents merely unwanted system noise or an actively regulated mechanism that is fundamental for maintaining and adapting accurate speech movements. Recent work on upper limb movements suggest that inter-trial variability may be not only actively regulated based on sensory feedback, but also provide a type of workspace exploration that facilitates sensorimotor learning. We therefore investigated whether experimentally reducing or magnifying inter-trial formant variability in the real-time auditory feedback during speech production (a) leads to adjustments in formant production variability that compensate for the manipulation, (b) changes the temporal structure of formant adjustments across productions, and (c) enhances learning in a subsequent adaptation task in which a predictable formant-shift perturbation is applied to the feedback signal. Results show that subjects gradually increased formant variability in their productions when hearing auditory feedback with reduced variability, but subsequent formant-shift adaptation was not affected by either reducing or magnifying the perceived variability. Thus, findings provide evidence for speakers’ active control of inter-trial formant variability based on auditory feedback from previous trials, but–at least for the current short-term experimental manipulation of feedback variability–not for a role of this variability regulation mechanism in subsequent auditory-motor learning.
first_indexed 2024-12-11T18:26:43Z
format Article
id doaj.art-486c67f910434ec188769e16d49477e4
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1662-5161
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-11T18:26:43Z
publishDate 2022-07-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
spelling doaj.art-486c67f910434ec188769e16d49477e42022-12-22T00:55:02ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Human Neuroscience1662-51612022-07-011610.3389/fnhum.2022.890065890065Inter-Trial Formant Variability in Speech Production Is Actively Controlled but Does Not Affect Subsequent Adaptation to a Predictable Formant PerturbationHantao Wang0Ludo Max1Ludo Max2Department of Speech and Hearing Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United StatesDepartment of Speech and Hearing Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United StatesHaskins Laboratories, New Haven, CT, United StatesDespite ample evidence that speech production is associated with extensive trial-to-trial variability, it remains unclear whether this variability represents merely unwanted system noise or an actively regulated mechanism that is fundamental for maintaining and adapting accurate speech movements. Recent work on upper limb movements suggest that inter-trial variability may be not only actively regulated based on sensory feedback, but also provide a type of workspace exploration that facilitates sensorimotor learning. We therefore investigated whether experimentally reducing or magnifying inter-trial formant variability in the real-time auditory feedback during speech production (a) leads to adjustments in formant production variability that compensate for the manipulation, (b) changes the temporal structure of formant adjustments across productions, and (c) enhances learning in a subsequent adaptation task in which a predictable formant-shift perturbation is applied to the feedback signal. Results show that subjects gradually increased formant variability in their productions when hearing auditory feedback with reduced variability, but subsequent formant-shift adaptation was not affected by either reducing or magnifying the perceived variability. Thus, findings provide evidence for speakers’ active control of inter-trial formant variability based on auditory feedback from previous trials, but–at least for the current short-term experimental manipulation of feedback variability–not for a role of this variability regulation mechanism in subsequent auditory-motor learning.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnhum.2022.890065/fullspeech motor controlvariabilityadaptationauditory feedbackacousticsarticulation
spellingShingle Hantao Wang
Ludo Max
Ludo Max
Inter-Trial Formant Variability in Speech Production Is Actively Controlled but Does Not Affect Subsequent Adaptation to a Predictable Formant Perturbation
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
speech motor control
variability
adaptation
auditory feedback
acoustics
articulation
title Inter-Trial Formant Variability in Speech Production Is Actively Controlled but Does Not Affect Subsequent Adaptation to a Predictable Formant Perturbation
title_full Inter-Trial Formant Variability in Speech Production Is Actively Controlled but Does Not Affect Subsequent Adaptation to a Predictable Formant Perturbation
title_fullStr Inter-Trial Formant Variability in Speech Production Is Actively Controlled but Does Not Affect Subsequent Adaptation to a Predictable Formant Perturbation
title_full_unstemmed Inter-Trial Formant Variability in Speech Production Is Actively Controlled but Does Not Affect Subsequent Adaptation to a Predictable Formant Perturbation
title_short Inter-Trial Formant Variability in Speech Production Is Actively Controlled but Does Not Affect Subsequent Adaptation to a Predictable Formant Perturbation
title_sort inter trial formant variability in speech production is actively controlled but does not affect subsequent adaptation to a predictable formant perturbation
topic speech motor control
variability
adaptation
auditory feedback
acoustics
articulation
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnhum.2022.890065/full
work_keys_str_mv AT hantaowang intertrialformantvariabilityinspeechproductionisactivelycontrolledbutdoesnotaffectsubsequentadaptationtoapredictableformantperturbation
AT ludomax intertrialformantvariabilityinspeechproductionisactivelycontrolledbutdoesnotaffectsubsequentadaptationtoapredictableformantperturbation
AT ludomax intertrialformantvariabilityinspeechproductionisactivelycontrolledbutdoesnotaffectsubsequentadaptationtoapredictableformantperturbation