Clinical feasibility of combining transcranial direct current stimulation with standard aphasia therapy

Background: Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a safe, portable, and inexpensive form of noninvasive brain stimulation that appears to augment the effects of concurrent therapy. However, several methodological issues in existing studies distance tDCS from current clinical practice. In...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: E Susan Duncan, Surani G Nakkawita
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2020-01-01
Series:Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.annalsofian.org/article.asp?issn=0972-2327;year=2020;volume=23;issue=8;spage=102;epage=108;aulast=Duncan
_version_ 1818882725115854848
author E Susan Duncan
Surani G Nakkawita
author_facet E Susan Duncan
Surani G Nakkawita
author_sort E Susan Duncan
collection DOAJ
description Background: Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a safe, portable, and inexpensive form of noninvasive brain stimulation that appears to augment the effects of concurrent therapy. However, several methodological issues in existing studies distance tDCS from current clinical practice. In this study, we offered (and administered) tDCS to individuals seeking typical behavioral aphasia therapy on an outpatient basis. Methods: We approached clients (n = 10) planning to receive standard aphasia therapy at a university clinic. Following a brief description of tDCS, we offered to provide stimulation during their therapy. Those interested and without contraindications participated in a double-blind, sham-controlled crossover study of tDCS paired with speech-language therapy provided twice weekly. Participants received active (2 mA) or sham tDCS during two eight-week therapy phases (separated by ten weeks) with the anode over Broca's area and the cathode on the contralateral forehead. Stimulation was provided for the first 20 minutes of each one-hour session. Prior to and following each phase, participants were video recorded telling the Cinderella narrative. Recordings were transcribed and analyzed for correct information units (CIUs). Results: Seven individuals (70%) were interested in and eligible for tDCS. Data from four participants who completed the study indicated a large effect size favoring active over sham tDCS (Cohen's d = 1.32). The participant with the most severe deficits did not benefit from therapy in either condition. Conclusion: There is potential for tDCS to enhance meaningful communication outcomes in standard clinical practice. Further investigation is needed to replicate findings and determine individual characteristics predictive of treatment response.
first_indexed 2024-12-19T15:22:19Z
format Article
id doaj.art-4874ddc83fbe4918bdcc627f2deac1bf
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0972-2327
1998-3549
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-19T15:22:19Z
publishDate 2020-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology
spelling doaj.art-4874ddc83fbe4918bdcc627f2deac1bf2022-12-21T20:15:59ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsAnnals of Indian Academy of Neurology0972-23271998-35492020-01-0123810210810.4103/aian.AIAN_540_20Clinical feasibility of combining transcranial direct current stimulation with standard aphasia therapyE Susan DuncanSurani G NakkawitaBackground: Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a safe, portable, and inexpensive form of noninvasive brain stimulation that appears to augment the effects of concurrent therapy. However, several methodological issues in existing studies distance tDCS from current clinical practice. In this study, we offered (and administered) tDCS to individuals seeking typical behavioral aphasia therapy on an outpatient basis. Methods: We approached clients (n = 10) planning to receive standard aphasia therapy at a university clinic. Following a brief description of tDCS, we offered to provide stimulation during their therapy. Those interested and without contraindications participated in a double-blind, sham-controlled crossover study of tDCS paired with speech-language therapy provided twice weekly. Participants received active (2 mA) or sham tDCS during two eight-week therapy phases (separated by ten weeks) with the anode over Broca's area and the cathode on the contralateral forehead. Stimulation was provided for the first 20 minutes of each one-hour session. Prior to and following each phase, participants were video recorded telling the Cinderella narrative. Recordings were transcribed and analyzed for correct information units (CIUs). Results: Seven individuals (70%) were interested in and eligible for tDCS. Data from four participants who completed the study indicated a large effect size favoring active over sham tDCS (Cohen's d = 1.32). The participant with the most severe deficits did not benefit from therapy in either condition. Conclusion: There is potential for tDCS to enhance meaningful communication outcomes in standard clinical practice. Further investigation is needed to replicate findings and determine individual characteristics predictive of treatment response.http://www.annalsofian.org/article.asp?issn=0972-2327;year=2020;volume=23;issue=8;spage=102;epage=108;aulast=Duncanaphasiarehabilitationspeech therapystroketranscranial direct current stimulation
spellingShingle E Susan Duncan
Surani G Nakkawita
Clinical feasibility of combining transcranial direct current stimulation with standard aphasia therapy
Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology
aphasia
rehabilitation
speech therapy
stroke
transcranial direct current stimulation
title Clinical feasibility of combining transcranial direct current stimulation with standard aphasia therapy
title_full Clinical feasibility of combining transcranial direct current stimulation with standard aphasia therapy
title_fullStr Clinical feasibility of combining transcranial direct current stimulation with standard aphasia therapy
title_full_unstemmed Clinical feasibility of combining transcranial direct current stimulation with standard aphasia therapy
title_short Clinical feasibility of combining transcranial direct current stimulation with standard aphasia therapy
title_sort clinical feasibility of combining transcranial direct current stimulation with standard aphasia therapy
topic aphasia
rehabilitation
speech therapy
stroke
transcranial direct current stimulation
url http://www.annalsofian.org/article.asp?issn=0972-2327;year=2020;volume=23;issue=8;spage=102;epage=108;aulast=Duncan
work_keys_str_mv AT esusanduncan clinicalfeasibilityofcombiningtranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationwithstandardaphasiatherapy
AT suranignakkawita clinicalfeasibilityofcombiningtranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationwithstandardaphasiatherapy