Comparison of 10‐year Outcomes of Bryan Cervical Disc Arthroplasty for Myelopathy and Radiculopathy

Objective To evaluate the long‐term efficacy of Bryan cervical disc arthroplasty in the treatment of myelopathy patients compared with radiculopathy patients. Methods This study is a prospective study. Sixty‐six patients (38 patients in myelopathy group and 28 patients in radiculopathy group) who we...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Xiao Han, Da He, Ning Zhang, Qingpeng Song, Jinchao Wang, Wei Tian
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2019-12-01
Series:Orthopaedic Surgery
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1111/os.12565
_version_ 1828414280145305600
author Xiao Han
Da He
Ning Zhang
Qingpeng Song
Jinchao Wang
Wei Tian
author_facet Xiao Han
Da He
Ning Zhang
Qingpeng Song
Jinchao Wang
Wei Tian
author_sort Xiao Han
collection DOAJ
description Objective To evaluate the long‐term efficacy of Bryan cervical disc arthroplasty in the treatment of myelopathy patients compared with radiculopathy patients. Methods This study is a prospective study. Sixty‐six patients (38 patients in myelopathy group and 28 patients in radiculopathy group) who were treated with Bryan cervical disc arthroplasty between 2004 and 2007 and followed for 10 years were included in this study. The Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, neck disability index (NDI), and Odom's criteria were used to evaluate the clinical outcomes. X‐ray, computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were used to evaluate the radiographic outcomes including the global range of motion (ROM), segmental ROM, and segment alignment before the surgery and at last follow‐up. The incidence of segmental kyphosis, segmental mobility lost, and the grade of paravertebral ossification (PO) were also evaluated at last follow‐up. Results The JOA score and NDI improved in both groups. Thirty‐three of 38 patients in myelopathy group and all patients in radiculopathy group reported good or excellent outcomes according to Odom's criteria. The segmental ROM was (9.5° ± 4.4°) before surgery and maintained at (9.0° ± 5.5°) at last follow‐up in myelopathy group. The segmental ROM was (9.5° ± 4.6°) and (9.0° ± 5.3°) before surgery and at last follow‐up in radiculopathy group, respectively. The Bryan prosthesis remained mobile at last follow‐up for 30 patients (78.9%) in the myelopathy group and 22 patients (78.6%) in the radiculopathy group. Of the patients in the myelopathy group, 21.1% developed segmental kyphosis, as did 21.4% of patients in the radiculopathy group. The incidence of PO and high‐grade PO was 92.1 and 28.9% in the myelopathy group, and was 92.9 and 32.1% in the radiculopathy group. There was no significant difference between both groups. Conclusions Bryan cervical disc arthroplasty was an effective and safe technique in treating patients with myelopathy. The clinical and radiographic outcomes in the myelopathy group were similar to those in the radiculopathy group at the 10‐year follow‐up.
first_indexed 2024-12-10T13:23:08Z
format Article
id doaj.art-4888faa5955545a18eeff76675d19d14
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1757-7853
1757-7861
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-10T13:23:08Z
publishDate 2019-12-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Orthopaedic Surgery
spelling doaj.art-4888faa5955545a18eeff76675d19d142022-12-22T01:47:15ZengWileyOrthopaedic Surgery1757-78531757-78612019-12-011161127113410.1111/os.12565Comparison of 10‐year Outcomes of Bryan Cervical Disc Arthroplasty for Myelopathy and RadiculopathyXiao Han0Da He1Ning Zhang2Qingpeng Song3Jinchao Wang4Wei Tian5Department of Spine Surgery Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, The Fourth Clinical College of Peking University Beijing ChinaDepartment of Spine Surgery Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, The Fourth Clinical College of Peking University Beijing ChinaDepartment of Spine Surgery Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, The Fourth Clinical College of Peking University Beijing ChinaDepartment of Spine Surgery Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, The Fourth Clinical College of Peking University Beijing ChinaDepartment of Spine Surgery Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, The Fourth Clinical College of Peking University Beijing ChinaDepartment of Spine Surgery Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, The Fourth Clinical College of Peking University Beijing ChinaObjective To evaluate the long‐term efficacy of Bryan cervical disc arthroplasty in the treatment of myelopathy patients compared with radiculopathy patients. Methods This study is a prospective study. Sixty‐six patients (38 patients in myelopathy group and 28 patients in radiculopathy group) who were treated with Bryan cervical disc arthroplasty between 2004 and 2007 and followed for 10 years were included in this study. The Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, neck disability index (NDI), and Odom's criteria were used to evaluate the clinical outcomes. X‐ray, computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were used to evaluate the radiographic outcomes including the global range of motion (ROM), segmental ROM, and segment alignment before the surgery and at last follow‐up. The incidence of segmental kyphosis, segmental mobility lost, and the grade of paravertebral ossification (PO) were also evaluated at last follow‐up. Results The JOA score and NDI improved in both groups. Thirty‐three of 38 patients in myelopathy group and all patients in radiculopathy group reported good or excellent outcomes according to Odom's criteria. The segmental ROM was (9.5° ± 4.4°) before surgery and maintained at (9.0° ± 5.5°) at last follow‐up in myelopathy group. The segmental ROM was (9.5° ± 4.6°) and (9.0° ± 5.3°) before surgery and at last follow‐up in radiculopathy group, respectively. The Bryan prosthesis remained mobile at last follow‐up for 30 patients (78.9%) in the myelopathy group and 22 patients (78.6%) in the radiculopathy group. Of the patients in the myelopathy group, 21.1% developed segmental kyphosis, as did 21.4% of patients in the radiculopathy group. The incidence of PO and high‐grade PO was 92.1 and 28.9% in the myelopathy group, and was 92.9 and 32.1% in the radiculopathy group. There was no significant difference between both groups. Conclusions Bryan cervical disc arthroplasty was an effective and safe technique in treating patients with myelopathy. The clinical and radiographic outcomes in the myelopathy group were similar to those in the radiculopathy group at the 10‐year follow‐up.https://doi.org/10.1111/os.12565Bryan discCervical disc arthroplastyLong‐term follow‐upMyelopathyRadiculopathy
spellingShingle Xiao Han
Da He
Ning Zhang
Qingpeng Song
Jinchao Wang
Wei Tian
Comparison of 10‐year Outcomes of Bryan Cervical Disc Arthroplasty for Myelopathy and Radiculopathy
Orthopaedic Surgery
Bryan disc
Cervical disc arthroplasty
Long‐term follow‐up
Myelopathy
Radiculopathy
title Comparison of 10‐year Outcomes of Bryan Cervical Disc Arthroplasty for Myelopathy and Radiculopathy
title_full Comparison of 10‐year Outcomes of Bryan Cervical Disc Arthroplasty for Myelopathy and Radiculopathy
title_fullStr Comparison of 10‐year Outcomes of Bryan Cervical Disc Arthroplasty for Myelopathy and Radiculopathy
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of 10‐year Outcomes of Bryan Cervical Disc Arthroplasty for Myelopathy and Radiculopathy
title_short Comparison of 10‐year Outcomes of Bryan Cervical Disc Arthroplasty for Myelopathy and Radiculopathy
title_sort comparison of 10 year outcomes of bryan cervical disc arthroplasty for myelopathy and radiculopathy
topic Bryan disc
Cervical disc arthroplasty
Long‐term follow‐up
Myelopathy
Radiculopathy
url https://doi.org/10.1111/os.12565
work_keys_str_mv AT xiaohan comparisonof10yearoutcomesofbryancervicaldiscarthroplastyformyelopathyandradiculopathy
AT dahe comparisonof10yearoutcomesofbryancervicaldiscarthroplastyformyelopathyandradiculopathy
AT ningzhang comparisonof10yearoutcomesofbryancervicaldiscarthroplastyformyelopathyandradiculopathy
AT qingpengsong comparisonof10yearoutcomesofbryancervicaldiscarthroplastyformyelopathyandradiculopathy
AT jinchaowang comparisonof10yearoutcomesofbryancervicaldiscarthroplastyformyelopathyandradiculopathy
AT weitian comparisonof10yearoutcomesofbryancervicaldiscarthroplastyformyelopathyandradiculopathy