Exploring EFL Supervisors' Feedback on Postgraduates' Research Proposals: Functions and Foci

Supervisory feedback plays a crucial role in supervising research in higher education. Feedback is a crucial component of successful teaching practices in the context of postgraduate research proposal writing. Effective supervisory feedback can promote supervisees' academic writing and enhance...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Atef AbuSaaleek, Aied Alenizi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universitas Islam Negeri Salatiga 2023-12-01
Series:Register Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ejournal.uinsalatiga.ac.id/index.php/register/article/view/291
_version_ 1831868425171894272
author Atef AbuSaaleek
Aied Alenizi
author_facet Atef AbuSaaleek
Aied Alenizi
author_sort Atef AbuSaaleek
collection DOAJ
description Supervisory feedback plays a crucial role in supervising research in higher education. Feedback is a crucial component of successful teaching practices in the context of postgraduate research proposal writing. Effective supervisory feedback can promote supervisees' academic writing and enhance the quality of their research proposals. Therefore, this study aimed to examine the feedback functions and feedback foci that EFL supervisors employ in their written feedback when refining postgraduate research proposals. A qualitative approach and simple descriptive quantitative measures were adopted to address the study's aims and estimate the prevalence of feedback forms. The study's sample included (N = 5) supervisors (4 male and 1 female supervisor) supervising postgraduate students as part of the M.A. in Applied Linguistics program. Data were collected from five supervisory feedback reports on postgraduates' research proposals and proposal drafts. The finding revealed that the EFL supervisors predominantly used directive feedback (52%) in their feedback provision instead of referential (30%) and expressive feedback (18%). Additionally, the findings showed that the EFL supervisors primarily focused on content issues (53%), followed by organization (29%) and appropriateness (19%), and the lowest number of supervisory feedback focused on linguistic accuracy (16%). The study provides pedagogical implications for supervisors and recommendations for further studies.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T17:20:40Z
format Article
id doaj.art-48aa466be43b45b9a5def71629c5ee4b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1979-8903
2503-040X
language English
last_indexed 2025-03-21T18:54:21Z
publishDate 2023-12-01
publisher Universitas Islam Negeri Salatiga
record_format Article
series Register Journal
spelling doaj.art-48aa466be43b45b9a5def71629c5ee4b2024-06-06T04:12:16ZengUniversitas Islam Negeri SalatigaRegister Journal1979-89032503-040X2023-12-0116220722310.18326/register.v16i2.207-223291Exploring EFL Supervisors' Feedback on Postgraduates' Research Proposals: Functions and FociAtef AbuSaaleek0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4727-2455Aied Alenizi1https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9875-4668Associate professor of Applied Linguistics, Department of English, College of Education, Majmaah UniversityAssociate professor of linguistics. Department of English, College of Education, Majmaah University, Al-Majmaah,Supervisory feedback plays a crucial role in supervising research in higher education. Feedback is a crucial component of successful teaching practices in the context of postgraduate research proposal writing. Effective supervisory feedback can promote supervisees' academic writing and enhance the quality of their research proposals. Therefore, this study aimed to examine the feedback functions and feedback foci that EFL supervisors employ in their written feedback when refining postgraduate research proposals. A qualitative approach and simple descriptive quantitative measures were adopted to address the study's aims and estimate the prevalence of feedback forms. The study's sample included (N = 5) supervisors (4 male and 1 female supervisor) supervising postgraduate students as part of the M.A. in Applied Linguistics program. Data were collected from five supervisory feedback reports on postgraduates' research proposals and proposal drafts. The finding revealed that the EFL supervisors predominantly used directive feedback (52%) in their feedback provision instead of referential (30%) and expressive feedback (18%). Additionally, the findings showed that the EFL supervisors primarily focused on content issues (53%), followed by organization (29%) and appropriateness (19%), and the lowest number of supervisory feedback focused on linguistic accuracy (16%). The study provides pedagogical implications for supervisors and recommendations for further studies.https://ejournal.uinsalatiga.ac.id/index.php/register/article/view/291academic writingthesis proposal writingefl supervisors, supervisory feedback, t
spellingShingle Atef AbuSaaleek
Aied Alenizi
Exploring EFL Supervisors' Feedback on Postgraduates' Research Proposals: Functions and Foci
Register Journal
academic writing
thesis proposal writing
efl supervisors, supervisory feedback, t
title Exploring EFL Supervisors' Feedback on Postgraduates' Research Proposals: Functions and Foci
title_full Exploring EFL Supervisors' Feedback on Postgraduates' Research Proposals: Functions and Foci
title_fullStr Exploring EFL Supervisors' Feedback on Postgraduates' Research Proposals: Functions and Foci
title_full_unstemmed Exploring EFL Supervisors' Feedback on Postgraduates' Research Proposals: Functions and Foci
title_short Exploring EFL Supervisors' Feedback on Postgraduates' Research Proposals: Functions and Foci
title_sort exploring efl supervisors feedback on postgraduates research proposals functions and foci
topic academic writing
thesis proposal writing
efl supervisors, supervisory feedback, t
url https://ejournal.uinsalatiga.ac.id/index.php/register/article/view/291
work_keys_str_mv AT atefabusaaleek exploringeflsupervisorsfeedbackonpostgraduatesresearchproposalsfunctionsandfoci
AT aiedalenizi exploringeflsupervisorsfeedbackonpostgraduatesresearchproposalsfunctionsandfoci