All I do is win, no matter what? What matters in gaining electoral support from televised debates
How much do the performances of top candidates in televised debates affect vote intentions in parliamentary democracies? The article addresses this question and disentangles the effects of predisposition and performance in televised debate reception. Drawing on a large-N field study of the 2017 cha...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Universidad de Navarra
2023-01-01
|
Series: | Communication & Society (Formerly Comunicación y Sociedad) |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://revistas.unav.edu/index.php/communication-and-society/article/view/42546 |
_version_ | 1828067056618045440 |
---|---|
author | Thomas Waldvogel Pascal-D. König Uwe Wagschal |
author_facet | Thomas Waldvogel Pascal-D. König Uwe Wagschal |
author_sort | Thomas Waldvogel |
collection | DOAJ |
description |
How much do the performances of top candidates in televised debates affect vote intentions in parliamentary democracies? The article addresses this question and disentangles the effects of predisposition and performance in televised debate reception. Drawing on a large-N field study of the 2017 chancellor duel in Germany, which contains survey and real-time response data for 5660 participants, we identify debate-induced determinants of shifts in voting intention and assess their relative effect sizes on such changes. Our analysis shows, first, that out-party identification is an effective barrier against shifts in voting intentions. However, we find that viewers’ real-time performance perceptions of the candidates show strong effects. Third, we demonstrate that these real-time evaluations can breach the predisposition’s barrier particularly when the intensity of out-party identification is less than very strong. Fourth, we find verdicts on the debate winner as an additional short-term factor that can foster shifts in voting intentions in the course of debate reception. Overall, our results indicate that pre-dispositions may hinder rational updating of electoral behaviour but that debate performance can actually make a difference by altering the formation of voting intentions.
|
first_indexed | 2024-04-10T23:40:16Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-48e3323fab3b46a395b399f12d1e834f |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2386-7876 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-04-10T23:40:16Z |
publishDate | 2023-01-01 |
publisher | Universidad de Navarra |
record_format | Article |
series | Communication & Society (Formerly Comunicación y Sociedad) |
spelling | doaj.art-48e3323fab3b46a395b399f12d1e834f2023-01-11T09:31:31ZengUniversidad de NavarraCommunication & Society (Formerly Comunicación y Sociedad)2386-78762023-01-0136110.15581/003.36.1.127-149All I do is win, no matter what? What matters in gaining electoral support from televised debatesThomas Waldvogel0Pascal-D. König1Uwe Wagschal2Albert-Ludwigs-UniversityUniversity of KaiserslauternAlbert-Ludwigs-University How much do the performances of top candidates in televised debates affect vote intentions in parliamentary democracies? The article addresses this question and disentangles the effects of predisposition and performance in televised debate reception. Drawing on a large-N field study of the 2017 chancellor duel in Germany, which contains survey and real-time response data for 5660 participants, we identify debate-induced determinants of shifts in voting intention and assess their relative effect sizes on such changes. Our analysis shows, first, that out-party identification is an effective barrier against shifts in voting intentions. However, we find that viewers’ real-time performance perceptions of the candidates show strong effects. Third, we demonstrate that these real-time evaluations can breach the predisposition’s barrier particularly when the intensity of out-party identification is less than very strong. Fourth, we find verdicts on the debate winner as an additional short-term factor that can foster shifts in voting intentions in the course of debate reception. Overall, our results indicate that pre-dispositions may hinder rational updating of electoral behaviour but that debate performance can actually make a difference by altering the formation of voting intentions. https://revistas.unav.edu/index.php/communication-and-society/article/view/42546Real-time response measurementtelevised debatesvoting intentionmotivated reasoningFederal election Germany |
spellingShingle | Thomas Waldvogel Pascal-D. König Uwe Wagschal All I do is win, no matter what? What matters in gaining electoral support from televised debates Communication & Society (Formerly Comunicación y Sociedad) Real-time response measurement televised debates voting intention motivated reasoning Federal election Germany |
title | All I do is win, no matter what? What matters in gaining electoral support from televised debates |
title_full | All I do is win, no matter what? What matters in gaining electoral support from televised debates |
title_fullStr | All I do is win, no matter what? What matters in gaining electoral support from televised debates |
title_full_unstemmed | All I do is win, no matter what? What matters in gaining electoral support from televised debates |
title_short | All I do is win, no matter what? What matters in gaining electoral support from televised debates |
title_sort | all i do is win no matter what what matters in gaining electoral support from televised debates |
topic | Real-time response measurement televised debates voting intention motivated reasoning Federal election Germany |
url | https://revistas.unav.edu/index.php/communication-and-society/article/view/42546 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT thomaswaldvogel allidoiswinnomatterwhatwhatmattersingainingelectoralsupportfromteleviseddebates AT pascaldkonig allidoiswinnomatterwhatwhatmattersingainingelectoralsupportfromteleviseddebates AT uwewagschal allidoiswinnomatterwhatwhatmattersingainingelectoralsupportfromteleviseddebates |