Jurisdiction without conflict? Remarks on non-adverse proceedings in Italy
The subject. This essay describes the procedural treatment of non-contentious matters inItaly. After a brief historical recount on the evolution of the concept of ‘non-contentiousjurisdiction’, from Roman law to the law in force, the chapter emphasizes the extreme varietyof non-adverse proceedings g...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | Russian |
Published: |
Dostoevsky Omsk State University
2017-10-01
|
Series: | Правоприменение |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://enforcement.omsu.ru/jour/article/view/106 |
_version_ | 1826564479528206336 |
---|---|
author | E. Silvestri |
author_facet | E. Silvestri |
author_sort | E. Silvestri |
collection | DOAJ |
description | The subject. This essay describes the procedural treatment of non-contentious matters inItaly. After a brief historical recount on the evolution of the concept of ‘non-contentiousjurisdiction’, from Roman law to the law in force, the chapter emphasizes the extreme varietyof non-adverse proceedings governed by the Code of civil procedure and special statutesas well.The purpose of the article is to understand the ‘default rules’ of non-adverse proceedings(meaning the rules applicable insofar as the law does not ordain otherwise) provided by theCode of civil procedure. These rules outline a procedure in chambers that is simpler andless time-consuming than the ordinary one: for these reasons, the procedure in chambershas been increasingly adopted for the judicial treatment of a few contentious matters, withmixed results.Methodology. The methodological basis for the study: general scientific methods (analysis,synthesis, comparison, description); private and academic (comparative legal, interpretation,formal-legal).Results. It is difficult to foresee whether in the near future more attention will be devotedby Italian legislators to non-contentious jurisdiction so as to lay down rules that are uniformand consistent. In recent decades, Italian civil procedure has been re-written again andagain in the attempt to solve the most serious and enduring problem of the justice system,namely, the excessive length of proceedings.Conclusions. As far as non-contentious matters, in light of the notorious overload of Italiancourts the author believes that they could be handles more efficiently by administrativeauthorities. |
first_indexed | 2024-04-10T01:24:52Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-48e3aeb4359041a9b58a131900d7a101 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2542-1514 2658-4050 |
language | Russian |
last_indexed | 2025-03-14T10:20:31Z |
publishDate | 2017-10-01 |
publisher | Dostoevsky Omsk State University |
record_format | Article |
series | Правоприменение |
spelling | doaj.art-48e3aeb4359041a9b58a131900d7a1012025-03-02T11:08:26ZrusDostoevsky Omsk State UniversityПравоприменение2542-15142658-40502017-10-011314314910.24147/2542-1514.2017.1(3).143-14987Jurisdiction without conflict? Remarks on non-adverse proceedings in ItalyE. Silvestri0University of PaviaThe subject. This essay describes the procedural treatment of non-contentious matters inItaly. After a brief historical recount on the evolution of the concept of ‘non-contentiousjurisdiction’, from Roman law to the law in force, the chapter emphasizes the extreme varietyof non-adverse proceedings governed by the Code of civil procedure and special statutesas well.The purpose of the article is to understand the ‘default rules’ of non-adverse proceedings(meaning the rules applicable insofar as the law does not ordain otherwise) provided by theCode of civil procedure. These rules outline a procedure in chambers that is simpler andless time-consuming than the ordinary one: for these reasons, the procedure in chambershas been increasingly adopted for the judicial treatment of a few contentious matters, withmixed results.Methodology. The methodological basis for the study: general scientific methods (analysis,synthesis, comparison, description); private and academic (comparative legal, interpretation,formal-legal).Results. It is difficult to foresee whether in the near future more attention will be devotedby Italian legislators to non-contentious jurisdiction so as to lay down rules that are uniformand consistent. In recent decades, Italian civil procedure has been re-written again andagain in the attempt to solve the most serious and enduring problem of the justice system,namely, the excessive length of proceedings.Conclusions. As far as non-contentious matters, in light of the notorious overload of Italiancourts the author believes that they could be handles more efficiently by administrativeauthorities.https://enforcement.omsu.ru/jour/article/view/106civil procedurenon-contentiousjurisdictionissue of lawnonadverse proceedingsitaly |
spellingShingle | E. Silvestri Jurisdiction without conflict? Remarks on non-adverse proceedings in Italy Правоприменение civil procedure non-contentious jurisdiction issue of law nonadverse proceedings italy |
title | Jurisdiction without conflict? Remarks on non-adverse proceedings in Italy |
title_full | Jurisdiction without conflict? Remarks on non-adverse proceedings in Italy |
title_fullStr | Jurisdiction without conflict? Remarks on non-adverse proceedings in Italy |
title_full_unstemmed | Jurisdiction without conflict? Remarks on non-adverse proceedings in Italy |
title_short | Jurisdiction without conflict? Remarks on non-adverse proceedings in Italy |
title_sort | jurisdiction without conflict remarks on non adverse proceedings in italy |
topic | civil procedure non-contentious jurisdiction issue of law nonadverse proceedings italy |
url | https://enforcement.omsu.ru/jour/article/view/106 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT esilvestri jurisdictionwithoutconflictremarksonnonadverseproceedingsinitaly |