Response of Methanogens in Arctic Sediments to Temperature and Methanogenic Substrate Availability.

Although cold environments are major contributors to global biogeochemical cycles, comparatively little is known about their microbial community function, structure, and limits of activity. In this study a microcosm based approach was used to investigate the effects of temperature, and methanogenic...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lynsay I Blake, Alexander Tveit, Lise Øvreås, Ian M Head, Neil D Gray
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2015-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4471053?pdf=render
_version_ 1819091969162346496
author Lynsay I Blake
Alexander Tveit
Lise Øvreås
Ian M Head
Neil D Gray
author_facet Lynsay I Blake
Alexander Tveit
Lise Øvreås
Ian M Head
Neil D Gray
author_sort Lynsay I Blake
collection DOAJ
description Although cold environments are major contributors to global biogeochemical cycles, comparatively little is known about their microbial community function, structure, and limits of activity. In this study a microcosm based approach was used to investigate the effects of temperature, and methanogenic substrate amendment, (acetate, methanol and H2/CO2) on methanogen activity and methanogen community structure in high Arctic wetlands (Solvatnet and Stuphallet, Svalbard). Methane production was not detected in Stuphallet sediment microcosms (over a 150 day period) and occurred within Solvatnet sediments microcosms (within 24 hours) at temperatures from 5 to 40°C, the maximum temperature being at far higher than in situ maximum temperatures (which range from air temperatures of -1.4 to 14.1°C during summer months). Distinct responses were observed in the Solvatnet methanogen community under different short term incubation conditions. Specifically, different communities were selected at higher and lower temperatures. At lower temperatures (5°C) addition of exogenous substrates (acetate, methanol or H2/CO2) had no stimulatory effect on the rate of methanogenesis or on methanogen community structure. The community in these incubations was dominated by members of the Methanoregulaceae/WCHA2-08 family-level group, which were most similar to the psychrotolerant hydrogenotrophic methanogen Methanosphaerula palustris strain E1-9c. In contrast, at higher temperatures, substrate amendment enhanced methane production in H2/CO2 amended microcosms, and played a clear role in structuring methanogen communities. Specifically, at 30°C members of the Methanoregulaceae/WCHA2-08 predominated following incubation with H2/CO2, and Methanosarcinaceaeand Methanosaetaceae were enriched in response to acetate addition. These results may indicate that in transiently cold environments, methanogen communities can rapidly respond to moderate short term increases in temperature, but not necessarily to the seasonal release of previously frozen organic carbon from thawing permafrost soils. However, as temperatures increase such inputs of carbon will likely have a greater influence on methane production and methanogen community structure. Understanding the action and limitations of anaerobic microorganisms within cold environments may provide information which can be used in defining region-specific differences in the microbial processes; which ultimately control methane flux to the atmosphere.
first_indexed 2024-12-21T22:48:10Z
format Article
id doaj.art-490c44776fcc4e5aa64718887fed5f58
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-21T22:48:10Z
publishDate 2015-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-490c44776fcc4e5aa64718887fed5f582022-12-21T18:47:38ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032015-01-01106e012973310.1371/journal.pone.0129733Response of Methanogens in Arctic Sediments to Temperature and Methanogenic Substrate Availability.Lynsay I BlakeAlexander TveitLise ØvreåsIan M HeadNeil D GrayAlthough cold environments are major contributors to global biogeochemical cycles, comparatively little is known about their microbial community function, structure, and limits of activity. In this study a microcosm based approach was used to investigate the effects of temperature, and methanogenic substrate amendment, (acetate, methanol and H2/CO2) on methanogen activity and methanogen community structure in high Arctic wetlands (Solvatnet and Stuphallet, Svalbard). Methane production was not detected in Stuphallet sediment microcosms (over a 150 day period) and occurred within Solvatnet sediments microcosms (within 24 hours) at temperatures from 5 to 40°C, the maximum temperature being at far higher than in situ maximum temperatures (which range from air temperatures of -1.4 to 14.1°C during summer months). Distinct responses were observed in the Solvatnet methanogen community under different short term incubation conditions. Specifically, different communities were selected at higher and lower temperatures. At lower temperatures (5°C) addition of exogenous substrates (acetate, methanol or H2/CO2) had no stimulatory effect on the rate of methanogenesis or on methanogen community structure. The community in these incubations was dominated by members of the Methanoregulaceae/WCHA2-08 family-level group, which were most similar to the psychrotolerant hydrogenotrophic methanogen Methanosphaerula palustris strain E1-9c. In contrast, at higher temperatures, substrate amendment enhanced methane production in H2/CO2 amended microcosms, and played a clear role in structuring methanogen communities. Specifically, at 30°C members of the Methanoregulaceae/WCHA2-08 predominated following incubation with H2/CO2, and Methanosarcinaceaeand Methanosaetaceae were enriched in response to acetate addition. These results may indicate that in transiently cold environments, methanogen communities can rapidly respond to moderate short term increases in temperature, but not necessarily to the seasonal release of previously frozen organic carbon from thawing permafrost soils. However, as temperatures increase such inputs of carbon will likely have a greater influence on methane production and methanogen community structure. Understanding the action and limitations of anaerobic microorganisms within cold environments may provide information which can be used in defining region-specific differences in the microbial processes; which ultimately control methane flux to the atmosphere.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4471053?pdf=render
spellingShingle Lynsay I Blake
Alexander Tveit
Lise Øvreås
Ian M Head
Neil D Gray
Response of Methanogens in Arctic Sediments to Temperature and Methanogenic Substrate Availability.
PLoS ONE
title Response of Methanogens in Arctic Sediments to Temperature and Methanogenic Substrate Availability.
title_full Response of Methanogens in Arctic Sediments to Temperature and Methanogenic Substrate Availability.
title_fullStr Response of Methanogens in Arctic Sediments to Temperature and Methanogenic Substrate Availability.
title_full_unstemmed Response of Methanogens in Arctic Sediments to Temperature and Methanogenic Substrate Availability.
title_short Response of Methanogens in Arctic Sediments to Temperature and Methanogenic Substrate Availability.
title_sort response of methanogens in arctic sediments to temperature and methanogenic substrate availability
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4471053?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT lynsayiblake responseofmethanogensinarcticsedimentstotemperatureandmethanogenicsubstrateavailability
AT alexandertveit responseofmethanogensinarcticsedimentstotemperatureandmethanogenicsubstrateavailability
AT liseøvreas responseofmethanogensinarcticsedimentstotemperatureandmethanogenicsubstrateavailability
AT ianmhead responseofmethanogensinarcticsedimentstotemperatureandmethanogenicsubstrateavailability
AT neildgray responseofmethanogensinarcticsedimentstotemperatureandmethanogenicsubstrateavailability