Influence of Four Radiotracers in PET/CT on Diagnostic Accuracy for Prostate Cancer: A Bivariate Random-Effects Meta-Analysis

Background/Aims: To date, several positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) radiotracers including fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG), carbon-11 labeled choline (11C-choline), 18-F fluorocholine (18F-FCH) and carbon-11 acetate (11C-acetate) have already been assessed in the app...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Junzhong Liu, Zhongfeng Chen, Tianyu Wang, Li Liu, Lei Zhao, Guangtao Guo, Dongqing Wang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Cell Physiol Biochem Press GmbH & Co KG 2016-07-01
Series:Cellular Physiology and Biochemistry
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.karger.com/Article/FullText/445639
_version_ 1819123575788929024
author Junzhong Liu
Zhongfeng Chen
Tianyu Wang
Li Liu
Lei Zhao
Guangtao Guo
Dongqing Wang
author_facet Junzhong Liu
Zhongfeng Chen
Tianyu Wang
Li Liu
Lei Zhao
Guangtao Guo
Dongqing Wang
author_sort Junzhong Liu
collection DOAJ
description Background/Aims: To date, several positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) radiotracers including fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG), carbon-11 labeled choline (11C-choline), 18-F fluorocholine (18F-FCH) and carbon-11 acetate (11C-acetate) have already been assessed in the application of prostate cancer (PCa) diagnosis to some extent, the diagnostic efficiency of these radiotracers still remain controversial. As a result of this, we carried out this meta-analysis for the purpose of comparing the diagnostic accuracy among four PET/CT radiotracers. Methods: A systematical literature search for articles was performed until July 3, 2015. We implemented all analysis using the statistical software of STATA12 and quality assessment was performed using QUADAS-2. Results: A total of 56 studies containing 3,586 patients were included in this meta-analysis. Parameter estimates of the overall analysis are as follows: sensitivity, 0.80 (95% CI: 0.74-0.85); specificity, 0.84 (95% CI: 0.77-0.89) and area under roc curve-AUC of SROC, 0.89 (95% CI: 0.86-0.91), indicating a relatively high level of accuracy in diagnosis of PCa. When different radiotracers of PET/CT were compared, 18F-FCH-PET/CT was ranked as the most favorable with the highest value of AUC (AUC = 0.94; 95% CI: 0.92-0.96) whereas 18F-FDG was the least favorable (AUC = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.69-0.77). Conclusion: This study suggested that PET/CT imaging plays an invaluable role in the diagnosis of PCa and 18F-FCH-PET/CT was considered as a superior diagnostic tool over other radiotracers. More attention should be paid to the diagnostic efficiency of the four radiotracers particularly for PCa patients with different clinical stages.
first_indexed 2024-12-22T07:10:32Z
format Article
id doaj.art-4912b7f135594a8a8a5a2667e7d4c002
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1015-8987
1421-9778
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-22T07:10:32Z
publishDate 2016-07-01
publisher Cell Physiol Biochem Press GmbH & Co KG
record_format Article
series Cellular Physiology and Biochemistry
spelling doaj.art-4912b7f135594a8a8a5a2667e7d4c0022022-12-21T18:34:31ZengCell Physiol Biochem Press GmbH & Co KGCellular Physiology and Biochemistry1015-89871421-97782016-07-0139246748010.1159/000445639445639Influence of Four Radiotracers in PET/CT on Diagnostic Accuracy for Prostate Cancer: A Bivariate Random-Effects Meta-AnalysisJunzhong LiuZhongfeng ChenTianyu WangLi LiuLei ZhaoGuangtao GuoDongqing WangBackground/Aims: To date, several positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) radiotracers including fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG), carbon-11 labeled choline (11C-choline), 18-F fluorocholine (18F-FCH) and carbon-11 acetate (11C-acetate) have already been assessed in the application of prostate cancer (PCa) diagnosis to some extent, the diagnostic efficiency of these radiotracers still remain controversial. As a result of this, we carried out this meta-analysis for the purpose of comparing the diagnostic accuracy among four PET/CT radiotracers. Methods: A systematical literature search for articles was performed until July 3, 2015. We implemented all analysis using the statistical software of STATA12 and quality assessment was performed using QUADAS-2. Results: A total of 56 studies containing 3,586 patients were included in this meta-analysis. Parameter estimates of the overall analysis are as follows: sensitivity, 0.80 (95% CI: 0.74-0.85); specificity, 0.84 (95% CI: 0.77-0.89) and area under roc curve-AUC of SROC, 0.89 (95% CI: 0.86-0.91), indicating a relatively high level of accuracy in diagnosis of PCa. When different radiotracers of PET/CT were compared, 18F-FCH-PET/CT was ranked as the most favorable with the highest value of AUC (AUC = 0.94; 95% CI: 0.92-0.96) whereas 18F-FDG was the least favorable (AUC = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.69-0.77). Conclusion: This study suggested that PET/CT imaging plays an invaluable role in the diagnosis of PCa and 18F-FCH-PET/CT was considered as a superior diagnostic tool over other radiotracers. More attention should be paid to the diagnostic efficiency of the four radiotracers particularly for PCa patients with different clinical stages.http://www.karger.com/Article/FullText/445639PET/CTDiagnosisProstate cancerMeta-analysis
spellingShingle Junzhong Liu
Zhongfeng Chen
Tianyu Wang
Li Liu
Lei Zhao
Guangtao Guo
Dongqing Wang
Influence of Four Radiotracers in PET/CT on Diagnostic Accuracy for Prostate Cancer: A Bivariate Random-Effects Meta-Analysis
Cellular Physiology and Biochemistry
PET/CT
Diagnosis
Prostate cancer
Meta-analysis
title Influence of Four Radiotracers in PET/CT on Diagnostic Accuracy for Prostate Cancer: A Bivariate Random-Effects Meta-Analysis
title_full Influence of Four Radiotracers in PET/CT on Diagnostic Accuracy for Prostate Cancer: A Bivariate Random-Effects Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Influence of Four Radiotracers in PET/CT on Diagnostic Accuracy for Prostate Cancer: A Bivariate Random-Effects Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Influence of Four Radiotracers in PET/CT on Diagnostic Accuracy for Prostate Cancer: A Bivariate Random-Effects Meta-Analysis
title_short Influence of Four Radiotracers in PET/CT on Diagnostic Accuracy for Prostate Cancer: A Bivariate Random-Effects Meta-Analysis
title_sort influence of four radiotracers in pet ct on diagnostic accuracy for prostate cancer a bivariate random effects meta analysis
topic PET/CT
Diagnosis
Prostate cancer
Meta-analysis
url http://www.karger.com/Article/FullText/445639
work_keys_str_mv AT junzhongliu influenceoffourradiotracersinpetctondiagnosticaccuracyforprostatecancerabivariaterandomeffectsmetaanalysis
AT zhongfengchen influenceoffourradiotracersinpetctondiagnosticaccuracyforprostatecancerabivariaterandomeffectsmetaanalysis
AT tianyuwang influenceoffourradiotracersinpetctondiagnosticaccuracyforprostatecancerabivariaterandomeffectsmetaanalysis
AT liliu influenceoffourradiotracersinpetctondiagnosticaccuracyforprostatecancerabivariaterandomeffectsmetaanalysis
AT leizhao influenceoffourradiotracersinpetctondiagnosticaccuracyforprostatecancerabivariaterandomeffectsmetaanalysis
AT guangtaoguo influenceoffourradiotracersinpetctondiagnosticaccuracyforprostatecancerabivariaterandomeffectsmetaanalysis
AT dongqingwang influenceoffourradiotracersinpetctondiagnosticaccuracyforprostatecancerabivariaterandomeffectsmetaanalysis