Urban studies and practices in the context of Social Transformation of Urban Planning in Russia (2008-2021 years)

<p>The field of urban planning in Russia (hereinafter — UP) is of particular interest for sociological analysis. By M.S. Larson, results of the activity of architects and town planners are not only material features, but also cultural, behavioral patterns which are inscribed in urban planning...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Svetlana Mihailovna Moskaleva
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Russian Academy of Sciences, Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology 2023-09-01
Series:Интеракция. Интервью. Интерпретация
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.inter-fnisc.ru/index.php/inter/article/view/5987/5816
_version_ 1797323448165335040
author Svetlana Mihailovna Moskaleva
author_facet Svetlana Mihailovna Moskaleva
author_sort Svetlana Mihailovna Moskaleva
collection DOAJ
description <p>The field of urban planning in Russia (hereinafter — UP) is of particular interest for sociological analysis. By M.S. Larson, results of the activity of architects and town planners are not only material features, but also cultural, behavioral patterns which are inscribed in urban planning projects. In the last decade, professionals, city managers, and developers have faced new challenges related to the quality of the urban environment. The request for new approaches in the field of renovation of urban spaces was formulated both by professionals, representatives of civil, expert communities and grassroots groups, and by government authorities (within the framework of the federal project “Formation of a Comfortable Urban Environment”).<br>The focus of this article is the analysis of “urbanistika” (=urban studies and practices) in Russia in 2008-2021, based on materials from expert interviews with professionals with experience in the field of urban planning. Key aspects of the transformation of UP that were identified during the analysis include: 1) marketization of UP, 2) the formation of an individualistic discourse, 3) the formation of a therapeutic discourse, 4) a communicative turn in UP, which is shown by the example of the emergence of new methods (participatory design and others methods aimed at taking into account the opinions of residents during the urban planning process), as well as the emergence of new actors (bloggers and urbanists) in urban discussions and projects.</p>
first_indexed 2024-03-08T05:28:49Z
format Article
id doaj.art-49272e4c1c94468686dfccdc3d1f6281
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2307-2075
2687-0401
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T05:28:49Z
publishDate 2023-09-01
publisher Russian Academy of Sciences, Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology
record_format Article
series Интеракция. Интервью. Интерпретация
spelling doaj.art-49272e4c1c94468686dfccdc3d1f62812024-02-06T08:30:42ZengRussian Academy of Sciences, Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied SociologyИнтеракция. Интервью. Интерпретация2307-20752687-04012023-09-01153314810.19181/inter.2023.15.3.25987Urban studies and practices in the context of Social Transformation of Urban Planning in Russia (2008-2021 years)Svetlana Mihailovna Moskaleva0Russia<p>The field of urban planning in Russia (hereinafter — UP) is of particular interest for sociological analysis. By M.S. Larson, results of the activity of architects and town planners are not only material features, but also cultural, behavioral patterns which are inscribed in urban planning projects. In the last decade, professionals, city managers, and developers have faced new challenges related to the quality of the urban environment. The request for new approaches in the field of renovation of urban spaces was formulated both by professionals, representatives of civil, expert communities and grassroots groups, and by government authorities (within the framework of the federal project “Formation of a Comfortable Urban Environment”).<br>The focus of this article is the analysis of “urbanistika” (=urban studies and practices) in Russia in 2008-2021, based on materials from expert interviews with professionals with experience in the field of urban planning. Key aspects of the transformation of UP that were identified during the analysis include: 1) marketization of UP, 2) the formation of an individualistic discourse, 3) the formation of a therapeutic discourse, 4) a communicative turn in UP, which is shown by the example of the emergence of new methods (participatory design and others methods aimed at taking into account the opinions of residents during the urban planning process), as well as the emergence of new actors (bloggers and urbanists) in urban discussions and projects.</p>https://www.inter-fnisc.ru/index.php/inter/article/view/5987/5816urban studiestown planningconstructivist institutionalismdiscourse analysis
spellingShingle Svetlana Mihailovna Moskaleva
Urban studies and practices in the context of Social Transformation of Urban Planning in Russia (2008-2021 years)
Интеракция. Интервью. Интерпретация
urban studies
town planning
constructivist institutionalism
discourse analysis
title Urban studies and practices in the context of Social Transformation of Urban Planning in Russia (2008-2021 years)
title_full Urban studies and practices in the context of Social Transformation of Urban Planning in Russia (2008-2021 years)
title_fullStr Urban studies and practices in the context of Social Transformation of Urban Planning in Russia (2008-2021 years)
title_full_unstemmed Urban studies and practices in the context of Social Transformation of Urban Planning in Russia (2008-2021 years)
title_short Urban studies and practices in the context of Social Transformation of Urban Planning in Russia (2008-2021 years)
title_sort urban studies and practices in the context of social transformation of urban planning in russia 2008 2021 years
topic urban studies
town planning
constructivist institutionalism
discourse analysis
url https://www.inter-fnisc.ru/index.php/inter/article/view/5987/5816
work_keys_str_mv AT svetlanamihailovnamoskaleva urbanstudiesandpracticesinthecontextofsocialtransformationofurbanplanninginrussia20082021years