Comparison of air temperature measured in a vineyard canopy and at a standard weather station.

The complex environment within a crop canopy leads to a high variability of the air temperature within the canopy, and, therefore, air temperature measured at a weather station (WS) does not represent the internal energy within a crop. The objectives of this study were to quantify the difference bet...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Andrés Javier Peña Quiñones, Gerrit Hoogenboom, Melba Ruth Salazar Gutiérrez, Claudio Stöckle, Markus Keller
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2020-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234436
_version_ 1819145646331920384
author Andrés Javier Peña Quiñones
Gerrit Hoogenboom
Melba Ruth Salazar Gutiérrez
Claudio Stöckle
Markus Keller
author_facet Andrés Javier Peña Quiñones
Gerrit Hoogenboom
Melba Ruth Salazar Gutiérrez
Claudio Stöckle
Markus Keller
author_sort Andrés Javier Peña Quiñones
collection DOAJ
description The complex environment within a crop canopy leads to a high variability of the air temperature within the canopy, and, therefore, air temperature measured at a weather station (WS) does not represent the internal energy within a crop. The objectives of this study were to quantify the difference between the air temperature measured at a standard WS and the air temperature within a six-year-old vineyard (cv. Chardonnay) and to determine the degree of uncertainty associated with the assumption that there is no difference between the two temperatures when air temperature is used as input in grapevine models. Thermistors and thermocouples were installed within the vine canopy at heights of 0.5 m and 1.2 m above the soil surface and immediately adjacent to the berry clusters. In the middle of the clusters sensors were installed to determine the temperature of the air surrounding the clusters facing east and west. The data were recorded within the canopy from December 2015 to June 2017 as well as at the standard WS that was installed close to the vineyard (410 m). Significant differences were found between the air temperatures measured at the WS and those within the vineyard during the summer when the average daily minimum air temperature within the canopy was 1.2°C less than at the WS and the average daily maximum air temperature in the canopy was 2.0°C higher than at the WS. The mean maximum air temperature measured in the clusters facing east was 1.5°C higher and west 4.0°C higher than the temperature measured at the WS. Therefore, models that assume that air temperature measured at a weather station is similar to air temperature measured in the vineyard canopy could have greater uncertainty than models that consider the temperature within the canopy.
first_indexed 2024-12-22T13:01:20Z
format Article
id doaj.art-4927db8ee89340a7a1334366cbecfca9
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-22T13:01:20Z
publishDate 2020-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-4927db8ee89340a7a1334366cbecfca92022-12-21T18:25:00ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032020-01-01156e023443610.1371/journal.pone.0234436Comparison of air temperature measured in a vineyard canopy and at a standard weather station.Andrés Javier Peña QuiñonesGerrit HoogenboomMelba Ruth Salazar GutiérrezClaudio StöckleMarkus KellerThe complex environment within a crop canopy leads to a high variability of the air temperature within the canopy, and, therefore, air temperature measured at a weather station (WS) does not represent the internal energy within a crop. The objectives of this study were to quantify the difference between the air temperature measured at a standard WS and the air temperature within a six-year-old vineyard (cv. Chardonnay) and to determine the degree of uncertainty associated with the assumption that there is no difference between the two temperatures when air temperature is used as input in grapevine models. Thermistors and thermocouples were installed within the vine canopy at heights of 0.5 m and 1.2 m above the soil surface and immediately adjacent to the berry clusters. In the middle of the clusters sensors were installed to determine the temperature of the air surrounding the clusters facing east and west. The data were recorded within the canopy from December 2015 to June 2017 as well as at the standard WS that was installed close to the vineyard (410 m). Significant differences were found between the air temperatures measured at the WS and those within the vineyard during the summer when the average daily minimum air temperature within the canopy was 1.2°C less than at the WS and the average daily maximum air temperature in the canopy was 2.0°C higher than at the WS. The mean maximum air temperature measured in the clusters facing east was 1.5°C higher and west 4.0°C higher than the temperature measured at the WS. Therefore, models that assume that air temperature measured at a weather station is similar to air temperature measured in the vineyard canopy could have greater uncertainty than models that consider the temperature within the canopy.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234436
spellingShingle Andrés Javier Peña Quiñones
Gerrit Hoogenboom
Melba Ruth Salazar Gutiérrez
Claudio Stöckle
Markus Keller
Comparison of air temperature measured in a vineyard canopy and at a standard weather station.
PLoS ONE
title Comparison of air temperature measured in a vineyard canopy and at a standard weather station.
title_full Comparison of air temperature measured in a vineyard canopy and at a standard weather station.
title_fullStr Comparison of air temperature measured in a vineyard canopy and at a standard weather station.
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of air temperature measured in a vineyard canopy and at a standard weather station.
title_short Comparison of air temperature measured in a vineyard canopy and at a standard weather station.
title_sort comparison of air temperature measured in a vineyard canopy and at a standard weather station
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234436
work_keys_str_mv AT andresjavierpenaquinones comparisonofairtemperaturemeasuredinavineyardcanopyandatastandardweatherstation
AT gerrithoogenboom comparisonofairtemperaturemeasuredinavineyardcanopyandatastandardweatherstation
AT melbaruthsalazargutierrez comparisonofairtemperaturemeasuredinavineyardcanopyandatastandardweatherstation
AT claudiostockle comparisonofairtemperaturemeasuredinavineyardcanopyandatastandardweatherstation
AT markuskeller comparisonofairtemperaturemeasuredinavineyardcanopyandatastandardweatherstation