Freud, Stern and McGilchrist: Developmental and Cultural Implications of Their Work
“Human beings have two fundamentally different ways of thinking about and engaging with the world.” Some variant of this proposition is shared by many thinkers across time. This paper focuses on the core similarities and the subtle (but significant) differences between Freud’s theory of primary and...
Main Author: | Daniel Burston |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
University of Warsaw
2019-07-01
|
Series: | Eidos. A Journal for Philosophy of Culture |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://eidos.uw.edu.pl/freud-stern-and-mcgilchrist-developmental-and-cultural-implications-of-their-work/ |
Similar Items
-
McGilchrist’s hemispheric homunculi
by: De Haan, D
Published: (2019) -
The divided brain and ways of building the world: parallels in the thought of Iain McGilchrist and Christopher Alexander
by: Or Ettlinger
Published: (2023-11-01) -
Contemporary psychoanalytic foundations : postmodernism, complexity, and neuroscience /
by: 508487 Leffert, Mark
Published: (c201) -
Shame, classroom resistance, and Bion’s desire not to know
by: Marshall Alcorn
Published: (2011-12-01) -
“Freud para todos”: psicoanálisis y cultura de masas en Chile, 1920-1950
by: Mariano Ruperthuz Honorato