Development and Testing of a Novel Measure to Assess Fidelity of Implementation: Example of the Mini-AFTERc Intervention

BackgroundFidelity of implementation (FOI) reflects whether an intervention was implemented in clinical practice according to the originally developed manual and is a key aspect in understanding intervention effectiveness. To illustrate this process of developing a fidelity measure, this study uses...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nathalie Georgia Brandt, Calum Thomas McHale, Gerald Michael Humphris
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-11-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.601813/full
_version_ 1819171567907635200
author Nathalie Georgia Brandt
Calum Thomas McHale
Gerald Michael Humphris
Gerald Michael Humphris
author_facet Nathalie Georgia Brandt
Calum Thomas McHale
Gerald Michael Humphris
Gerald Michael Humphris
author_sort Nathalie Georgia Brandt
collection DOAJ
description BackgroundFidelity of implementation (FOI) reflects whether an intervention was implemented in clinical practice according to the originally developed manual and is a key aspect in understanding intervention effectiveness. To illustrate this process of developing a fidelity measure, this study uses the Mini-AFTERc, a brief psychological intervention aimed at managing breast cancer patients’ fear of cancer recurrence, as an example.ObjectivesTo illustrate the development of an FOI measure through (1) applying this process to the Mini-AFTERc intervention, by including the design of a scoring system and rating criteria; (2) content validating the FOI measure using thematic framework analysis as a qualitative approach; (3) testing consistency of the FOI measure using interrater reliability.MethodsThe FOI measure was developed, its scoring system modified and the rating criteria defined. Thematic framework analysis was conducted to content validate the FOI measure using nine intervention discussions between four specialist cancer nurses and four breast cancer patients, and one simulated breast cancer patient. Intraclass-correlation was conducted to assess interrater reliability.ResultsThe qualitative findings suggested that the Mini-AFTERc FOI measure has content validity as it was able to measure all five components of the Mini-AFTERc intervention. The interrater reliability suggested a moderate to excellent degree of reliability among three raters, rICC = 0.84, 95% CI [0.51, 0.96].ConclusionThe study has illustrated the steps that an FOI measure can be developed through a systematic approach applied to the Mini-AFTERc intervention. The FOI measure was found to have content validity and was consistently applied, independently, by three researchers familiar with the Mini-AFTERc intervention. Future studies should determine whether similar levels of interrater reliability can be obtained by distributing written and/or video instructions to researchers who are unfamiliar with the FOI measure, using a larger sample. Employing developed and validated FOI measures such as the one presented for the Mini-AFTERc would facilitate implementation of interventions in the FCR field in clinical practice as intended.Clinical Trial Registrationwww.ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT03763825.
first_indexed 2024-12-22T19:53:21Z
format Article
id doaj.art-49332372f4324ee09304efe6602db5a0
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1664-1078
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-22T19:53:21Z
publishDate 2020-11-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Psychology
spelling doaj.art-49332372f4324ee09304efe6602db5a02022-12-21T18:14:30ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782020-11-011110.3389/fpsyg.2020.601813601813Development and Testing of a Novel Measure to Assess Fidelity of Implementation: Example of the Mini-AFTERc InterventionNathalie Georgia Brandt0Calum Thomas McHale1Gerald Michael Humphris2Gerald Michael Humphris3Division of Population and Behavioural Sciences, School of Medicine, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, United KingdomDivision of Population and Behavioural Sciences, School of Medicine, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, United KingdomDivision of Population and Behavioural Sciences, School of Medicine, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, United KingdomEdinburgh Cancer Centre, Western General Hospital, National Health Service Lothian, Edinburgh, United KingdomBackgroundFidelity of implementation (FOI) reflects whether an intervention was implemented in clinical practice according to the originally developed manual and is a key aspect in understanding intervention effectiveness. To illustrate this process of developing a fidelity measure, this study uses the Mini-AFTERc, a brief psychological intervention aimed at managing breast cancer patients’ fear of cancer recurrence, as an example.ObjectivesTo illustrate the development of an FOI measure through (1) applying this process to the Mini-AFTERc intervention, by including the design of a scoring system and rating criteria; (2) content validating the FOI measure using thematic framework analysis as a qualitative approach; (3) testing consistency of the FOI measure using interrater reliability.MethodsThe FOI measure was developed, its scoring system modified and the rating criteria defined. Thematic framework analysis was conducted to content validate the FOI measure using nine intervention discussions between four specialist cancer nurses and four breast cancer patients, and one simulated breast cancer patient. Intraclass-correlation was conducted to assess interrater reliability.ResultsThe qualitative findings suggested that the Mini-AFTERc FOI measure has content validity as it was able to measure all five components of the Mini-AFTERc intervention. The interrater reliability suggested a moderate to excellent degree of reliability among three raters, rICC = 0.84, 95% CI [0.51, 0.96].ConclusionThe study has illustrated the steps that an FOI measure can be developed through a systematic approach applied to the Mini-AFTERc intervention. The FOI measure was found to have content validity and was consistently applied, independently, by three researchers familiar with the Mini-AFTERc intervention. Future studies should determine whether similar levels of interrater reliability can be obtained by distributing written and/or video instructions to researchers who are unfamiliar with the FOI measure, using a larger sample. Employing developed and validated FOI measures such as the one presented for the Mini-AFTERc would facilitate implementation of interventions in the FCR field in clinical practice as intended.Clinical Trial Registrationwww.ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT03763825.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.601813/fullfidelityimplementationMini-AFTERc interventionbreast cancerfear of cancer recurrence
spellingShingle Nathalie Georgia Brandt
Calum Thomas McHale
Gerald Michael Humphris
Gerald Michael Humphris
Development and Testing of a Novel Measure to Assess Fidelity of Implementation: Example of the Mini-AFTERc Intervention
Frontiers in Psychology
fidelity
implementation
Mini-AFTERc intervention
breast cancer
fear of cancer recurrence
title Development and Testing of a Novel Measure to Assess Fidelity of Implementation: Example of the Mini-AFTERc Intervention
title_full Development and Testing of a Novel Measure to Assess Fidelity of Implementation: Example of the Mini-AFTERc Intervention
title_fullStr Development and Testing of a Novel Measure to Assess Fidelity of Implementation: Example of the Mini-AFTERc Intervention
title_full_unstemmed Development and Testing of a Novel Measure to Assess Fidelity of Implementation: Example of the Mini-AFTERc Intervention
title_short Development and Testing of a Novel Measure to Assess Fidelity of Implementation: Example of the Mini-AFTERc Intervention
title_sort development and testing of a novel measure to assess fidelity of implementation example of the mini afterc intervention
topic fidelity
implementation
Mini-AFTERc intervention
breast cancer
fear of cancer recurrence
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.601813/full
work_keys_str_mv AT nathaliegeorgiabrandt developmentandtestingofanovelmeasuretoassessfidelityofimplementationexampleoftheminiaftercintervention
AT calumthomasmchale developmentandtestingofanovelmeasuretoassessfidelityofimplementationexampleoftheminiaftercintervention
AT geraldmichaelhumphris developmentandtestingofanovelmeasuretoassessfidelityofimplementationexampleoftheminiaftercintervention
AT geraldmichaelhumphris developmentandtestingofanovelmeasuretoassessfidelityofimplementationexampleoftheminiaftercintervention