The interaction between a shaped charge jet and a single moving plate

Reactive armour is a very efficient add-on armour against shaped charge threats. Explosive reactive armour consists of one or several plates that are accelerated by an explosive. Similar but less violent acceleration of plates can also be achieved in a completely inert reactive armour. To be efficie...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Andreas Helte, Jonas Lundgren, Jonas Candle
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: KeAi Communications Co., Ltd. 2024-01-01
Series:Defence Technology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221491472300185X
_version_ 1797334727194050560
author Andreas Helte
Jonas Lundgren
Jonas Candle
author_facet Andreas Helte
Jonas Lundgren
Jonas Candle
author_sort Andreas Helte
collection DOAJ
description Reactive armour is a very efficient add-on armour against shaped charge threats. Explosive reactive armour consists of one or several plates that are accelerated by an explosive. Similar but less violent acceleration of plates can also be achieved in a completely inert reactive armour. To be efficient against elongated jets, the motion of the plates needs to be inclined against the jet such that a sliding contact between the jet and the plates is established. This sliding contact causes a deflection and thinning of the jet. Under certain circumstances, the contact will become unstable, leading to severe disturbances on the jet. These disturbances will drastically reduce the jet penetration performance and it is therefore of interest to study the conditions that leads to an unstable contact.Previous studies on the interaction between shaped charge jets and flyer plates have shown that it is mainly the forward moving plate in an explosive reactive armour that is effective in disturbing the jet. This is usually attributed to the higher plate-to-jet mass flux ratio involved in the collision of the forward moving plate compared to the backward moving plate. For slow moving plates, as occurs in inert reactive armour, the difference in mass flux for the forward and backward moving plate is much lesser, and it is therefore of interest to study if other factors than the mass flux influences on the protection capability.In this work, experiments have been performed where a plate is accelerated along its length, interacting with a shaped charge jet that is fired at an oblique angle to the plate’s normal, either against or along the plate’s velocity. The arrangement corresponds to a jet interacting with a flyer plate from a reactive armour, with the exception that the collision velocity is the same for both types of obliquities in these experiments. The experiments show that disturbances on the jet are different in the two cases even though the collision velocities are the same. Numerical simulations of the interaction support the observation. The difference is attributed to the character of the contact pressure in the interaction region. For a backward moving plate, the maximum contact pressure is obtained at the beginning of the interaction zone and the contact pressure is therefore higher upstream than downstream of the jet while the opposite is true for a forward moving plate. A negative interface pressure gradient with respect to the jet motion results in a more stable flow than a positive, which means that the jet-plate contact is more stable for a backward moving plate than for a forward moving plate. A forward moving plate is thus more effective in disturbing the jet than a backward moving plate, not only because of the higher jet to plate mass flux ratio but also because of the character of the contact with the jet.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T08:26:21Z
format Article
id doaj.art-495472b2272e4951bdb6140df33dc8f6
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2214-9147
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T08:26:21Z
publishDate 2024-01-01
publisher KeAi Communications Co., Ltd.
record_format Article
series Defence Technology
spelling doaj.art-495472b2272e4951bdb6140df33dc8f62024-02-02T04:39:14ZengKeAi Communications Co., Ltd.Defence Technology2214-91472024-01-0131113The interaction between a shaped charge jet and a single moving plateAndreas Helte0Jonas Lundgren1Jonas Candle2Corresponding author.; FOI, Weapons, Protection and Security, SE-164 90, Stockholm, SwedenFOI, Weapons, Protection and Security, SE-164 90, Stockholm, SwedenFOI, Weapons, Protection and Security, SE-164 90, Stockholm, SwedenReactive armour is a very efficient add-on armour against shaped charge threats. Explosive reactive armour consists of one or several plates that are accelerated by an explosive. Similar but less violent acceleration of plates can also be achieved in a completely inert reactive armour. To be efficient against elongated jets, the motion of the plates needs to be inclined against the jet such that a sliding contact between the jet and the plates is established. This sliding contact causes a deflection and thinning of the jet. Under certain circumstances, the contact will become unstable, leading to severe disturbances on the jet. These disturbances will drastically reduce the jet penetration performance and it is therefore of interest to study the conditions that leads to an unstable contact.Previous studies on the interaction between shaped charge jets and flyer plates have shown that it is mainly the forward moving plate in an explosive reactive armour that is effective in disturbing the jet. This is usually attributed to the higher plate-to-jet mass flux ratio involved in the collision of the forward moving plate compared to the backward moving plate. For slow moving plates, as occurs in inert reactive armour, the difference in mass flux for the forward and backward moving plate is much lesser, and it is therefore of interest to study if other factors than the mass flux influences on the protection capability.In this work, experiments have been performed where a plate is accelerated along its length, interacting with a shaped charge jet that is fired at an oblique angle to the plate’s normal, either against or along the plate’s velocity. The arrangement corresponds to a jet interacting with a flyer plate from a reactive armour, with the exception that the collision velocity is the same for both types of obliquities in these experiments. The experiments show that disturbances on the jet are different in the two cases even though the collision velocities are the same. Numerical simulations of the interaction support the observation. The difference is attributed to the character of the contact pressure in the interaction region. For a backward moving plate, the maximum contact pressure is obtained at the beginning of the interaction zone and the contact pressure is therefore higher upstream than downstream of the jet while the opposite is true for a forward moving plate. A negative interface pressure gradient with respect to the jet motion results in a more stable flow than a positive, which means that the jet-plate contact is more stable for a backward moving plate than for a forward moving plate. A forward moving plate is thus more effective in disturbing the jet than a backward moving plate, not only because of the higher jet to plate mass flux ratio but also because of the character of the contact with the jet.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221491472300185XReactive armourFlyer plateShaped charge jet
spellingShingle Andreas Helte
Jonas Lundgren
Jonas Candle
The interaction between a shaped charge jet and a single moving plate
Defence Technology
Reactive armour
Flyer plate
Shaped charge jet
title The interaction between a shaped charge jet and a single moving plate
title_full The interaction between a shaped charge jet and a single moving plate
title_fullStr The interaction between a shaped charge jet and a single moving plate
title_full_unstemmed The interaction between a shaped charge jet and a single moving plate
title_short The interaction between a shaped charge jet and a single moving plate
title_sort interaction between a shaped charge jet and a single moving plate
topic Reactive armour
Flyer plate
Shaped charge jet
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221491472300185X
work_keys_str_mv AT andreashelte theinteractionbetweenashapedchargejetandasinglemovingplate
AT jonaslundgren theinteractionbetweenashapedchargejetandasinglemovingplate
AT jonascandle theinteractionbetweenashapedchargejetandasinglemovingplate
AT andreashelte interactionbetweenashapedchargejetandasinglemovingplate
AT jonaslundgren interactionbetweenashapedchargejetandasinglemovingplate
AT jonascandle interactionbetweenashapedchargejetandasinglemovingplate