Waarom is de Liturgische Beweging nooit een zelfstandige “modaliteit” geworden in het Nederlandse protestantisme? Historische en systematisch-theologische beschouwingen

Like many other churches, Protestantism in the Netherlands had its own Liturgical Movement during the twentieth century. Unlike some churches, for example the Anglican Communion, the liturgical identity of parts of Dutch Protestantism never led to the formation of a “modaliteit” – a distinctive, org...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Mattijs Ploeger
Format: Article
Language:Afrikaans
Published: University of Groningen Press 2023-12-01
Series:Yearbook for Ritual and Liturgical Studies
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ugp.rug.nl/jvlo/article/view/41372
_version_ 1797262507052630016
author Mattijs Ploeger
author_facet Mattijs Ploeger
author_sort Mattijs Ploeger
collection DOAJ
description Like many other churches, Protestantism in the Netherlands had its own Liturgical Movement during the twentieth century. Unlike some churches, for example the Anglican Communion, the liturgical identity of parts of Dutch Protestantism never led to the formation of a “modaliteit” – a distinctive, organized party within the church. This article first argues that the Protestant Liturgical Movement initially possessed enough distinctive neo-patristic theological and spiritual potential to form such a party. Subsequently, the article explores why the formation of such a “modaliteit” did not take place. The reason is found in an implosion and restart of the Liturgical Movement in Dutch Protestantism, which took place during the 1950s and which changed the theological and spiritual profile of the Movement. By losing its neo-patristic theology, the Movement lost both the opportunity and the necessity of forming a distinctive party within the church.
first_indexed 2024-04-24T23:58:12Z
format Article
id doaj.art-4962e50e5c774444b936875acf76142a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2589-3998
language Afrikaans
last_indexed 2024-04-24T23:58:12Z
publishDate 2023-12-01
publisher University of Groningen Press
record_format Article
series Yearbook for Ritual and Liturgical Studies
spelling doaj.art-4962e50e5c774444b936875acf76142a2024-03-14T10:13:52ZafrUniversity of Groningen PressYearbook for Ritual and Liturgical Studies2589-39982023-12-0139668010.21827/YRLS.39.66-8031038Waarom is de Liturgische Beweging nooit een zelfstandige “modaliteit” geworden in het Nederlandse protestantisme? Historische en systematisch-theologische beschouwingenMattijs Ploeger0Oud-Katholiek SeminarieLike many other churches, Protestantism in the Netherlands had its own Liturgical Movement during the twentieth century. Unlike some churches, for example the Anglican Communion, the liturgical identity of parts of Dutch Protestantism never led to the formation of a “modaliteit” – a distinctive, organized party within the church. This article first argues that the Protestant Liturgical Movement initially possessed enough distinctive neo-patristic theological and spiritual potential to form such a party. Subsequently, the article explores why the formation of such a “modaliteit” did not take place. The reason is found in an implosion and restart of the Liturgical Movement in Dutch Protestantism, which took place during the 1950s and which changed the theological and spiritual profile of the Movement. By losing its neo-patristic theology, the Movement lost both the opportunity and the necessity of forming a distinctive party within the church.https://ugp.rug.nl/jvlo/article/view/41372liturgical movementdutch protestantismneo-patristic theologyliturgical theology
spellingShingle Mattijs Ploeger
Waarom is de Liturgische Beweging nooit een zelfstandige “modaliteit” geworden in het Nederlandse protestantisme? Historische en systematisch-theologische beschouwingen
Yearbook for Ritual and Liturgical Studies
liturgical movement
dutch protestantism
neo-patristic theology
liturgical theology
title Waarom is de Liturgische Beweging nooit een zelfstandige “modaliteit” geworden in het Nederlandse protestantisme? Historische en systematisch-theologische beschouwingen
title_full Waarom is de Liturgische Beweging nooit een zelfstandige “modaliteit” geworden in het Nederlandse protestantisme? Historische en systematisch-theologische beschouwingen
title_fullStr Waarom is de Liturgische Beweging nooit een zelfstandige “modaliteit” geworden in het Nederlandse protestantisme? Historische en systematisch-theologische beschouwingen
title_full_unstemmed Waarom is de Liturgische Beweging nooit een zelfstandige “modaliteit” geworden in het Nederlandse protestantisme? Historische en systematisch-theologische beschouwingen
title_short Waarom is de Liturgische Beweging nooit een zelfstandige “modaliteit” geworden in het Nederlandse protestantisme? Historische en systematisch-theologische beschouwingen
title_sort waarom is de liturgische beweging nooit een zelfstandige modaliteit geworden in het nederlandse protestantisme historische en systematisch theologische beschouwingen
topic liturgical movement
dutch protestantism
neo-patristic theology
liturgical theology
url https://ugp.rug.nl/jvlo/article/view/41372
work_keys_str_mv AT mattijsploeger waaromisdeliturgischebewegingnooiteenzelfstandigemodaliteitgewordeninhetnederlandseprotestantismehistorischeensystematischtheologischebeschouwingen