Evaluating Defect Reporting in New Residential Buildings in New Zealand
The need for defect reporting is becoming increasingly difficult to ignore at handover of new residential buildings. A general review in defect studies has consistently shown that newly built properties can be found to have a significant number of defects. Very often the responsibility for rectifyin...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2015-01-01
|
Series: | Buildings |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.mdpi.com/2075-5309/5/1/39 |
_version_ | 1818892285566255104 |
---|---|
author | Funmilayo Ebun Rotimi John Tookey James Olabode Rotimi |
author_facet | Funmilayo Ebun Rotimi John Tookey James Olabode Rotimi |
author_sort | Funmilayo Ebun Rotimi |
collection | DOAJ |
description | The need for defect reporting is becoming increasingly difficult to ignore at handover of new residential buildings. A general review in defect studies has consistently shown that newly built properties can be found to have a significant number of defects. Very often the responsibility for rectifying these common defects is borne by the new homeowner even though house developers are liable. In the current study, survey data is obtained from 216 recent home purchasers/owners across New Zealand urban cities. The intent of the investigation is to show that opportunities exist for defect reporting that will act as a mechanism to measure performance and thus improve the quality of finished construction products in New Zealand. The study found that a significant number (81%) of the participants were involved in the construction of their homes and could influence quality performance if they were proactive enough. The results show that (64.7%) did not engage the service of independent building inspectors for defect reporting on their new homes. Seventy-four percent now agree that independent building inspection was important in hindsight. The study findings are in line with literature on defects and the poor use of defect reporting in new residential buildings. The current challenge for defect rectification by house developers after handover is real and this could increase the confidence that new home owners can have in their developers. Defect reporting could confer benefits to new residential building quality in New Zealand and should be embraced as part of a wider best practice. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-19T17:54:17Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-4972ed2339af4cbc838cb559f7f07b56 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2075-5309 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-19T17:54:17Z |
publishDate | 2015-01-01 |
publisher | MDPI AG |
record_format | Article |
series | Buildings |
spelling | doaj.art-4972ed2339af4cbc838cb559f7f07b562022-12-21T20:11:50ZengMDPI AGBuildings2075-53092015-01-0151395510.3390/buildings5010039buildings5010039Evaluating Defect Reporting in New Residential Buildings in New ZealandFunmilayo Ebun Rotimi0John Tookey1James Olabode Rotimi2University Admissions, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland 1010, New ZealandConstruction Management Programme, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland 1010, New ZealandConstruction Management Programme, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland 1010, New ZealandThe need for defect reporting is becoming increasingly difficult to ignore at handover of new residential buildings. A general review in defect studies has consistently shown that newly built properties can be found to have a significant number of defects. Very often the responsibility for rectifying these common defects is borne by the new homeowner even though house developers are liable. In the current study, survey data is obtained from 216 recent home purchasers/owners across New Zealand urban cities. The intent of the investigation is to show that opportunities exist for defect reporting that will act as a mechanism to measure performance and thus improve the quality of finished construction products in New Zealand. The study found that a significant number (81%) of the participants were involved in the construction of their homes and could influence quality performance if they were proactive enough. The results show that (64.7%) did not engage the service of independent building inspectors for defect reporting on their new homes. Seventy-four percent now agree that independent building inspection was important in hindsight. The study findings are in line with literature on defects and the poor use of defect reporting in new residential buildings. The current challenge for defect rectification by house developers after handover is real and this could increase the confidence that new home owners can have in their developers. Defect reporting could confer benefits to new residential building quality in New Zealand and should be embraced as part of a wider best practice.http://www.mdpi.com/2075-5309/5/1/39defectsdefect reportingresidential buildingsNew Zealand |
spellingShingle | Funmilayo Ebun Rotimi John Tookey James Olabode Rotimi Evaluating Defect Reporting in New Residential Buildings in New Zealand Buildings defects defect reporting residential buildings New Zealand |
title | Evaluating Defect Reporting in New Residential Buildings in New Zealand |
title_full | Evaluating Defect Reporting in New Residential Buildings in New Zealand |
title_fullStr | Evaluating Defect Reporting in New Residential Buildings in New Zealand |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluating Defect Reporting in New Residential Buildings in New Zealand |
title_short | Evaluating Defect Reporting in New Residential Buildings in New Zealand |
title_sort | evaluating defect reporting in new residential buildings in new zealand |
topic | defects defect reporting residential buildings New Zealand |
url | http://www.mdpi.com/2075-5309/5/1/39 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT funmilayoebunrotimi evaluatingdefectreportinginnewresidentialbuildingsinnewzealand AT johntookey evaluatingdefectreportinginnewresidentialbuildingsinnewzealand AT jamesolaboderotimi evaluatingdefectreportinginnewresidentialbuildingsinnewzealand |