Can the POLARS tool accurately predict low anterior resection syndrome in rectal cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic resection?

Introduction Radical rectal cancer resection can lead to a long-term bowel function impairment known as low anterior resection syndrome (LARS). It remains unclear how to determine which patients are at a higher risk of developing LARS post-surgery. The POLARS tool was designed to predict the onset a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Paweł Bogacki, Jan Krzak, Tomasz Gach, Wojciech Szwed, Mirosław Szura
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Termedia Publishing House 2019-09-01
Series:Archives of Medical Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.archivesofmedicalscience.com/Can-the-POLARS-tool-accurately-predict-low-anterior-resection-syndrome-in-rectal,110949,0,2.html
_version_ 1827620434627002368
author Paweł Bogacki
Jan Krzak
Tomasz Gach
Wojciech Szwed
Mirosław Szura
author_facet Paweł Bogacki
Jan Krzak
Tomasz Gach
Wojciech Szwed
Mirosław Szura
author_sort Paweł Bogacki
collection DOAJ
description Introduction Radical rectal cancer resection can lead to a long-term bowel function impairment known as low anterior resection syndrome (LARS). It remains unclear how to determine which patients are at a higher risk of developing LARS post-surgery. The POLARS tool was designed to predict the onset and severity of LARS in rectal cancer patients after surgery. The study aimed to assess the accuracy of POLARS in predicting the onset of LARS. Material and methods A total of 66 rectal cancer patients treated laparoscopically between January 2016 and December 2017 were included in this retrospective study. Using POLARS, the predictive value for the occurrence of LARS was documented. During an average 17-month follow-up period, the bowel function of the patients was assessed using the dedicated LARS questionnaire. The predicted and actual scores were then compared. Results Study participants included 36 women (54.5%) and 30 men (45.5%), with a mean age of 62.55 years (standard deviation: 10.2; range: 37–81). The mean predicted score according to POLARS was 24.5 (i.e. category “minor LARS”), and the mean actual score in the follow-up period was 16.42 (“no LARS” category). In only 39% of patients, the predicted LARS category was the same as the actual LARS category assessed by the questionnaire. Worse bowel function than reported at follow-up was predicted in 75% of all mispredictions. Conclusions POLARS did not prove to be accurate in predicting the risk and severity of LARS in these patients, although the average numbers appear promising. Further evaluation of the POLARS tool using a larger cohort is needed.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T10:47:18Z
format Article
id doaj.art-4974b3db7fec4bd6b9a78e5852c1fd8a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1734-1922
1896-9151
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T10:47:18Z
publishDate 2019-09-01
publisher Termedia Publishing House
record_format Article
series Archives of Medical Science
spelling doaj.art-4974b3db7fec4bd6b9a78e5852c1fd8a2023-12-01T09:52:58ZengTermedia Publishing HouseArchives of Medical Science1734-19221896-91512019-09-0119236537010.5114/aoms.2019.87760110949Can the POLARS tool accurately predict low anterior resection syndrome in rectal cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic resection?Paweł Bogacki0Jan Krzak1Tomasz Gach2Wojciech Szwed3Mirosław Szura4Department of Experimental and Clinical Surgery, Jagiellonian University, Kraków, PolandDepartment of Surgery, South Jutland Hospital, Aabenraa, DenmarkDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Surgery, Jagiellonian University, Kraków, PolandDepartment of General and Oncological Surgery, St John Grande Hospital, Krakow, PolandDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Surgery, Jagiellonian University, Kraków, PolandIntroduction Radical rectal cancer resection can lead to a long-term bowel function impairment known as low anterior resection syndrome (LARS). It remains unclear how to determine which patients are at a higher risk of developing LARS post-surgery. The POLARS tool was designed to predict the onset and severity of LARS in rectal cancer patients after surgery. The study aimed to assess the accuracy of POLARS in predicting the onset of LARS. Material and methods A total of 66 rectal cancer patients treated laparoscopically between January 2016 and December 2017 were included in this retrospective study. Using POLARS, the predictive value for the occurrence of LARS was documented. During an average 17-month follow-up period, the bowel function of the patients was assessed using the dedicated LARS questionnaire. The predicted and actual scores were then compared. Results Study participants included 36 women (54.5%) and 30 men (45.5%), with a mean age of 62.55 years (standard deviation: 10.2; range: 37–81). The mean predicted score according to POLARS was 24.5 (i.e. category “minor LARS”), and the mean actual score in the follow-up period was 16.42 (“no LARS” category). In only 39% of patients, the predicted LARS category was the same as the actual LARS category assessed by the questionnaire. Worse bowel function than reported at follow-up was predicted in 75% of all mispredictions. Conclusions POLARS did not prove to be accurate in predicting the risk and severity of LARS in these patients, although the average numbers appear promising. Further evaluation of the POLARS tool using a larger cohort is needed.https://www.archivesofmedicalscience.com/Can-the-POLARS-tool-accurately-predict-low-anterior-resection-syndrome-in-rectal,110949,0,2.htmlquality of liferectal cancerlarslower anterior resectionpolars
spellingShingle Paweł Bogacki
Jan Krzak
Tomasz Gach
Wojciech Szwed
Mirosław Szura
Can the POLARS tool accurately predict low anterior resection syndrome in rectal cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic resection?
Archives of Medical Science
quality of life
rectal cancer
lars
lower anterior resection
polars
title Can the POLARS tool accurately predict low anterior resection syndrome in rectal cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic resection?
title_full Can the POLARS tool accurately predict low anterior resection syndrome in rectal cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic resection?
title_fullStr Can the POLARS tool accurately predict low anterior resection syndrome in rectal cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic resection?
title_full_unstemmed Can the POLARS tool accurately predict low anterior resection syndrome in rectal cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic resection?
title_short Can the POLARS tool accurately predict low anterior resection syndrome in rectal cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic resection?
title_sort can the polars tool accurately predict low anterior resection syndrome in rectal cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic resection
topic quality of life
rectal cancer
lars
lower anterior resection
polars
url https://www.archivesofmedicalscience.com/Can-the-POLARS-tool-accurately-predict-low-anterior-resection-syndrome-in-rectal,110949,0,2.html
work_keys_str_mv AT pawełbogacki canthepolarstoolaccuratelypredictlowanteriorresectionsyndromeinrectalcancerpatientsundergoinglaparoscopicresection
AT jankrzak canthepolarstoolaccuratelypredictlowanteriorresectionsyndromeinrectalcancerpatientsundergoinglaparoscopicresection
AT tomaszgach canthepolarstoolaccuratelypredictlowanteriorresectionsyndromeinrectalcancerpatientsundergoinglaparoscopicresection
AT wojciechszwed canthepolarstoolaccuratelypredictlowanteriorresectionsyndromeinrectalcancerpatientsundergoinglaparoscopicresection
AT mirosławszura canthepolarstoolaccuratelypredictlowanteriorresectionsyndromeinrectalcancerpatientsundergoinglaparoscopicresection