Evaluation of the Bearing Capacity of the Board Pile in Collapsible Soil using A Laboratory Model
The pile’s ultimate capacity or failure load must be computed by some criteria using load-settlement curve data gathered during the pile load test. Many scholars have proposed several approaches for evaluating the pile’s ultimate capacity in the past. This study compared different failure criteria t...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
EDP Sciences
2023-01-01
|
| Series: | E3S Web of Conferences |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.e3s-conferences.org/articles/e3sconf/pdf/2023/64/e3sconf_icgee2023_01018.pdf |
| _version_ | 1797673580445564928 |
|---|---|
| author | Mohsen Abeer H. Albusoda Bushra S. |
| author_facet | Mohsen Abeer H. Albusoda Bushra S. |
| author_sort | Mohsen Abeer H. |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The pile’s ultimate capacity or failure load must be computed by some criteria using load-settlement curve data gathered during the pile load test. Many scholars have proposed several approaches for evaluating the pile’s ultimate capacity in the past. This study compared different failure criteria to predict the ultimate load capacity for piles with two different lengths-to-diameter ratios embedded in gypseous soil with gypsum content of 60% under soaked and unsoaked conditions. Two types of piles were used. Floating pile and end-bearing pile. Davisson, Brinch Hansen’s 80 percent, Chin-Kondner, Mazurkiewicz’s, and Brinch Hansen’s 90 methods that were used in this study predict a higher value of the ultimate pile capacity, whereas the Decourt Extrapolation method gave fluctuated value. Fuller and Hoy’s, Butler and Hoy’s methods give far away value from realistic. On the other hand, Shen’s, ASTM, Terzaghi, and DeBeer’s methods predicted an acceptable and realistic value. The failure criterion of (15%D) where (D) is pile diameter according to(ASTM D-1143) was adopted in this type of soil. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-11T21:46:26Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-497d53497e38465e96552478b925adf9 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2267-1242 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-11T21:46:26Z |
| publishDate | 2023-01-01 |
| publisher | EDP Sciences |
| record_format | Article |
| series | E3S Web of Conferences |
| spelling | doaj.art-497d53497e38465e96552478b925adf92023-09-26T10:11:59ZengEDP SciencesE3S Web of Conferences2267-12422023-01-014270101810.1051/e3sconf/202342701018e3sconf_icgee2023_01018Evaluation of the Bearing Capacity of the Board Pile in Collapsible Soil using A Laboratory ModelMohsen Abeer H.0Albusoda Bushra S.1Department of Civil Engineering, University of BaghdadDepartment of Civil Engineering, University of BaghdadThe pile’s ultimate capacity or failure load must be computed by some criteria using load-settlement curve data gathered during the pile load test. Many scholars have proposed several approaches for evaluating the pile’s ultimate capacity in the past. This study compared different failure criteria to predict the ultimate load capacity for piles with two different lengths-to-diameter ratios embedded in gypseous soil with gypsum content of 60% under soaked and unsoaked conditions. Two types of piles were used. Floating pile and end-bearing pile. Davisson, Brinch Hansen’s 80 percent, Chin-Kondner, Mazurkiewicz’s, and Brinch Hansen’s 90 methods that were used in this study predict a higher value of the ultimate pile capacity, whereas the Decourt Extrapolation method gave fluctuated value. Fuller and Hoy’s, Butler and Hoy’s methods give far away value from realistic. On the other hand, Shen’s, ASTM, Terzaghi, and DeBeer’s methods predicted an acceptable and realistic value. The failure criterion of (15%D) where (D) is pile diameter according to(ASTM D-1143) was adopted in this type of soil.https://www.e3s-conferences.org/articles/e3sconf/pdf/2023/64/e3sconf_icgee2023_01018.pdfbearing capacitygypseous soilfailure criteriaload settlement curve |
| spellingShingle | Mohsen Abeer H. Albusoda Bushra S. Evaluation of the Bearing Capacity of the Board Pile in Collapsible Soil using A Laboratory Model E3S Web of Conferences bearing capacity gypseous soil failure criteria load settlement curve |
| title | Evaluation of the Bearing Capacity of the Board Pile in Collapsible Soil using A Laboratory Model |
| title_full | Evaluation of the Bearing Capacity of the Board Pile in Collapsible Soil using A Laboratory Model |
| title_fullStr | Evaluation of the Bearing Capacity of the Board Pile in Collapsible Soil using A Laboratory Model |
| title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of the Bearing Capacity of the Board Pile in Collapsible Soil using A Laboratory Model |
| title_short | Evaluation of the Bearing Capacity of the Board Pile in Collapsible Soil using A Laboratory Model |
| title_sort | evaluation of the bearing capacity of the board pile in collapsible soil using a laboratory model |
| topic | bearing capacity gypseous soil failure criteria load settlement curve |
| url | https://www.e3s-conferences.org/articles/e3sconf/pdf/2023/64/e3sconf_icgee2023_01018.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT mohsenabeerh evaluationofthebearingcapacityoftheboardpileincollapsiblesoilusingalaboratorymodel AT albusodabushras evaluationofthebearingcapacityoftheboardpileincollapsiblesoilusingalaboratorymodel |