Evaluation of InSAR Tropospheric Delay Correction Methods in a Low-Latitude Alpine Canyon Region

Tropospheric delay error must be reduced during interferometric synthetic aperture radar (InSAR) measurement. Depending on different geographical environments, an appropriate correction method should be selected to improve the accuracy of InSAR deformation monitoring. In this study, surface deformat...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yanxi Zhao, Xiaoqing Zuo, Yongfa Li, Shipeng Guo, Jinwei Bu, Qihang Yang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-02-01
Series:Remote Sensing
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/15/4/990
_version_ 1797618424586698752
author Yanxi Zhao
Xiaoqing Zuo
Yongfa Li
Shipeng Guo
Jinwei Bu
Qihang Yang
author_facet Yanxi Zhao
Xiaoqing Zuo
Yongfa Li
Shipeng Guo
Jinwei Bu
Qihang Yang
author_sort Yanxi Zhao
collection DOAJ
description Tropospheric delay error must be reduced during interferometric synthetic aperture radar (InSAR) measurement. Depending on different geographical environments, an appropriate correction method should be selected to improve the accuracy of InSAR deformation monitoring. In this study, surface deformation monitoring was conducted in a high mountain gorge region in Yunnan Province, China, using Sentinel-1A images of ascending and descending tracks. The tropospheric delay in the InSAR interferogram was corrected using the Linear, Generic Atmospheric Correction Online Service for InSAR (GACOS) and ERA-5 meteorological reanalysis data (ERA5) methods. The correction effect was evaluated by combining phase standard deviation, semi-variance function, elevation correlation, and global navigation satellite system (GNSS) deformation monitoring results. The mean value of the phase standard deviation (Aver) of the linear correction interferogram and the threshold value (sill) of the semi-variogram were reduced by –20.98% and –41%, respectively, while the accuracy of the InSAR deformation points near the GNSS site was increased by 58%. The results showed that the three methods reduced the tropospheric delay error of InSAR deformation monitoring by different degrees in low-latitude mountains and valleys. Linear correction was the best at alleviating the tropospheric delay, followed by GACOS, while ERA5 had poor correction stability.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T08:12:41Z
format Article
id doaj.art-499ecaab90254d8c8309c225e6ffe7ee
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2072-4292
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T08:12:41Z
publishDate 2023-02-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Remote Sensing
spelling doaj.art-499ecaab90254d8c8309c225e6ffe7ee2023-11-16T23:02:13ZengMDPI AGRemote Sensing2072-42922023-02-0115499010.3390/rs15040990Evaluation of InSAR Tropospheric Delay Correction Methods in a Low-Latitude Alpine Canyon RegionYanxi Zhao0Xiaoqing Zuo1Yongfa Li2Shipeng Guo3Jinwei Bu4Qihang Yang5School of Land Resources Engineering, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650093, ChinaSchool of Land Resources Engineering, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650093, ChinaSchool of Land Resources Engineering, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650093, ChinaSchool of Land Resources Engineering, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650093, ChinaSchool of Land Resources Engineering, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650093, ChinaSchool of Land Resources Engineering, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650093, ChinaTropospheric delay error must be reduced during interferometric synthetic aperture radar (InSAR) measurement. Depending on different geographical environments, an appropriate correction method should be selected to improve the accuracy of InSAR deformation monitoring. In this study, surface deformation monitoring was conducted in a high mountain gorge region in Yunnan Province, China, using Sentinel-1A images of ascending and descending tracks. The tropospheric delay in the InSAR interferogram was corrected using the Linear, Generic Atmospheric Correction Online Service for InSAR (GACOS) and ERA-5 meteorological reanalysis data (ERA5) methods. The correction effect was evaluated by combining phase standard deviation, semi-variance function, elevation correlation, and global navigation satellite system (GNSS) deformation monitoring results. The mean value of the phase standard deviation (Aver) of the linear correction interferogram and the threshold value (sill) of the semi-variogram were reduced by –20.98% and –41%, respectively, while the accuracy of the InSAR deformation points near the GNSS site was increased by 58%. The results showed that the three methods reduced the tropospheric delay error of InSAR deformation monitoring by different degrees in low-latitude mountains and valleys. Linear correction was the best at alleviating the tropospheric delay, followed by GACOS, while ERA5 had poor correction stability.https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/15/4/990SBAS-InSARtropospheric delaydeformation monitoringJinsha River basin
spellingShingle Yanxi Zhao
Xiaoqing Zuo
Yongfa Li
Shipeng Guo
Jinwei Bu
Qihang Yang
Evaluation of InSAR Tropospheric Delay Correction Methods in a Low-Latitude Alpine Canyon Region
Remote Sensing
SBAS-InSAR
tropospheric delay
deformation monitoring
Jinsha River basin
title Evaluation of InSAR Tropospheric Delay Correction Methods in a Low-Latitude Alpine Canyon Region
title_full Evaluation of InSAR Tropospheric Delay Correction Methods in a Low-Latitude Alpine Canyon Region
title_fullStr Evaluation of InSAR Tropospheric Delay Correction Methods in a Low-Latitude Alpine Canyon Region
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of InSAR Tropospheric Delay Correction Methods in a Low-Latitude Alpine Canyon Region
title_short Evaluation of InSAR Tropospheric Delay Correction Methods in a Low-Latitude Alpine Canyon Region
title_sort evaluation of insar tropospheric delay correction methods in a low latitude alpine canyon region
topic SBAS-InSAR
tropospheric delay
deformation monitoring
Jinsha River basin
url https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/15/4/990
work_keys_str_mv AT yanxizhao evaluationofinsartroposphericdelaycorrectionmethodsinalowlatitudealpinecanyonregion
AT xiaoqingzuo evaluationofinsartroposphericdelaycorrectionmethodsinalowlatitudealpinecanyonregion
AT yongfali evaluationofinsartroposphericdelaycorrectionmethodsinalowlatitudealpinecanyonregion
AT shipengguo evaluationofinsartroposphericdelaycorrectionmethodsinalowlatitudealpinecanyonregion
AT jinweibu evaluationofinsartroposphericdelaycorrectionmethodsinalowlatitudealpinecanyonregion
AT qihangyang evaluationofinsartroposphericdelaycorrectionmethodsinalowlatitudealpinecanyonregion