Reliability of One Ceph software in cephalometric tracing: A comparative study
Background: Lateral cephalogram can now be traced using android-based smartphones making dentist's work easier and time saving. Various orthodontic analysis can also be carried out using these smart apps. This study was undertaken to assess the reliability of the android smartphone-based app wi...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
2020-01-01
|
Series: | SRM Journal of Research in Dental Sciences |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.srmjrds.in/article.asp?issn=0976-433X;year=2020;volume=11;issue=1;spage=35;epage=39;aulast=Khader |
_version_ | 1811196438095331328 |
---|---|
author | Deema Abdul Khader Faizal C Peedikayil T P Chandru Soni Kottayi Dhanesh Namboothiri |
author_facet | Deema Abdul Khader Faizal C Peedikayil T P Chandru Soni Kottayi Dhanesh Namboothiri |
author_sort | Deema Abdul Khader |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Background: Lateral cephalogram can now be traced using android-based smartphones making dentist's work easier and time saving. Various orthodontic analysis can also be carried out using these smart apps. This study was undertaken to assess the reliability of the android smartphone-based app with the manual tracing using Tweed analysis. Materials and Methods: A total of 40 lateral cephalometric radiographs were taken randomly from patients below 15 years reported for orthodontic problems. Tweed analysis was carried out for each radiograph; incisal mandibular plane angle, facial mandibular angle, and facial mandibular incisal plane angle were recorded, first manually traced, followed by digitally using android-based OneCeph digital cephalometric tracer. Values obtained by android-based OneCeph and manual methods are compared. Results: The values showed normal distribution, therefore parametric test was used to analyze the data; there was no statistically significant difference between the values obtained for Tweed analysis by android-based tracing and manual cephalometric tracing. Conclusion: This study showed that the digital tracing with the OneCeph software had the same accuracy in comparison to manual tracing and could be used instead of the traditional methods for various orthodontic analysis. |
first_indexed | 2024-04-12T00:58:57Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-49a98a096e4545cd9e83994a1295aad0 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2772-5243 2772-5251 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-04-12T00:58:57Z |
publishDate | 2020-01-01 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications |
record_format | Article |
series | SRM Journal of Research in Dental Sciences |
spelling | doaj.art-49a98a096e4545cd9e83994a1295aad02022-12-22T03:54:32ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsSRM Journal of Research in Dental Sciences2772-52432772-52512020-01-01111353910.4103/srmjrds.srmjrds_69_19Reliability of One Ceph software in cephalometric tracing: A comparative studyDeema Abdul KhaderFaizal C PeedikayilT P ChandruSoni KottayiDhanesh NamboothiriBackground: Lateral cephalogram can now be traced using android-based smartphones making dentist's work easier and time saving. Various orthodontic analysis can also be carried out using these smart apps. This study was undertaken to assess the reliability of the android smartphone-based app with the manual tracing using Tweed analysis. Materials and Methods: A total of 40 lateral cephalometric radiographs were taken randomly from patients below 15 years reported for orthodontic problems. Tweed analysis was carried out for each radiograph; incisal mandibular plane angle, facial mandibular angle, and facial mandibular incisal plane angle were recorded, first manually traced, followed by digitally using android-based OneCeph digital cephalometric tracer. Values obtained by android-based OneCeph and manual methods are compared. Results: The values showed normal distribution, therefore parametric test was used to analyze the data; there was no statistically significant difference between the values obtained for Tweed analysis by android-based tracing and manual cephalometric tracing. Conclusion: This study showed that the digital tracing with the OneCeph software had the same accuracy in comparison to manual tracing and could be used instead of the traditional methods for various orthodontic analysis.http://www.srmjrds.in/article.asp?issn=0976-433X;year=2020;volume=11;issue=1;spage=35;epage=39;aulast=Khadercephalometrydigital cephalometrytweed analysis |
spellingShingle | Deema Abdul Khader Faizal C Peedikayil T P Chandru Soni Kottayi Dhanesh Namboothiri Reliability of One Ceph software in cephalometric tracing: A comparative study SRM Journal of Research in Dental Sciences cephalometry digital cephalometry tweed analysis |
title | Reliability of One Ceph software in cephalometric tracing: A comparative study |
title_full | Reliability of One Ceph software in cephalometric tracing: A comparative study |
title_fullStr | Reliability of One Ceph software in cephalometric tracing: A comparative study |
title_full_unstemmed | Reliability of One Ceph software in cephalometric tracing: A comparative study |
title_short | Reliability of One Ceph software in cephalometric tracing: A comparative study |
title_sort | reliability of one ceph software in cephalometric tracing a comparative study |
topic | cephalometry digital cephalometry tweed analysis |
url | http://www.srmjrds.in/article.asp?issn=0976-433X;year=2020;volume=11;issue=1;spage=35;epage=39;aulast=Khader |
work_keys_str_mv | AT deemaabdulkhader reliabilityofonecephsoftwareincephalometrictracingacomparativestudy AT faizalcpeedikayil reliabilityofonecephsoftwareincephalometrictracingacomparativestudy AT tpchandru reliabilityofonecephsoftwareincephalometrictracingacomparativestudy AT sonikottayi reliabilityofonecephsoftwareincephalometrictracingacomparativestudy AT dhaneshnamboothiri reliabilityofonecephsoftwareincephalometrictracingacomparativestudy |