Diversity and Inclusion in Plastic Surgery Education: A National Survey by the American Council of Academic Plastic Surgeons

Introduction:. To date, there have been few studies in the field of plastic surgery examining the knowledge, attitudes, and behavior of educators and residents regarding diversity and inclusion, especially for the purposes of enhancing resident education, improving diversity efforts, and addressing...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sara Obeid, MD, MPH, Alex Fanning, BS, C. Scott Hultman, MD, MBA
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer 2017-09-01
Series:Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Global Open
Online Access:http://journals.lww.com/prsgo/fulltext/10.1097/GOX.0000000000001469
_version_ 1817986725520080896
author Sara Obeid, MD, MPH
Alex Fanning, BS
C. Scott Hultman, MD, MBA
author_facet Sara Obeid, MD, MPH
Alex Fanning, BS
C. Scott Hultman, MD, MBA
author_sort Sara Obeid, MD, MPH
collection DOAJ
description Introduction:. To date, there have been few studies in the field of plastic surgery examining the knowledge, attitudes, and behavior of educators and residents regarding diversity and inclusion, especially for the purposes of enhancing resident education, improving diversity efforts, and addressing health care disparities. Methods:. An anonymous survey was provided electronically to a total of 462 American Council of Academic Plastic Surgeon members and 91 program coordinators (PCs), and 1,029 plastic surgery residents at 91 institutions across the United States. We analyzed the responses from PCs and program directors (PDs). Results:. We collected responses from 34 institutions (37%), and 16.8% of American Council of Academic Plastic Surgeon members including 34 PCs and 44 PDs. We found that PDs were more likely to be male (86%) and above the age of 40 years (97%) compared with PCs (5% male and 61% above 40 years). Both groups were majority White. Fifty-nine percentage of PDs have a parent/guardian who attained a graduate degree versus 15% of PCs. Forty-eight percentage of PDs speak another language compared with 16% of PCs. More importantly, 95% of PDs had an opportunity to engage in diversity and inclusion-related activities in the last 6 months as compared with 43% of PCs; however, we did not find a statistical difference based on knowledge of increasing institutional capacity of diversity and inclusion between the 2 groups. PCs were more likely to witness discrimination (64%) than PDs (40%) in the health care setting, with body type/weight emerging as the most common type of discrimination. Very few respondents (10%) indicated they discriminated against others. Conclusions:. Plastic surgery educators are committed to diversity and inclusion. Improvements can be made by incorporating PCs more frequently in activities related to the topic along with focused training on improving diversity on an institutional rather than individual level. Our study suggests body type/weight is the most common type of discrimination witnessed by the entire cohort and that diversity and inclusion remains a sensitive topic.
first_indexed 2024-04-14T00:13:03Z
format Article
id doaj.art-49b403499c19487c8776dafc24a8c34a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2169-7574
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-14T00:13:03Z
publishDate 2017-09-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer
record_format Article
series Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Global Open
spelling doaj.art-49b403499c19487c8776dafc24a8c34a2022-12-22T02:23:14ZengWolters KluwerPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Global Open2169-75742017-09-0159S-2e146910.1097/GOX.0000000000001469201709002-00001Diversity and Inclusion in Plastic Surgery Education: A National Survey by the American Council of Academic Plastic SurgeonsSara Obeid, MD, MPH0Alex Fanning, BS1C. Scott Hultman, MD, MBA2From the *School of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, N.C.; and †Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic Surgery, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, N.C.From the *School of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, N.C.; and †Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic Surgery, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, N.C.From the *School of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, N.C.; and †Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic Surgery, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, N.C.Introduction:. To date, there have been few studies in the field of plastic surgery examining the knowledge, attitudes, and behavior of educators and residents regarding diversity and inclusion, especially for the purposes of enhancing resident education, improving diversity efforts, and addressing health care disparities. Methods:. An anonymous survey was provided electronically to a total of 462 American Council of Academic Plastic Surgeon members and 91 program coordinators (PCs), and 1,029 plastic surgery residents at 91 institutions across the United States. We analyzed the responses from PCs and program directors (PDs). Results:. We collected responses from 34 institutions (37%), and 16.8% of American Council of Academic Plastic Surgeon members including 34 PCs and 44 PDs. We found that PDs were more likely to be male (86%) and above the age of 40 years (97%) compared with PCs (5% male and 61% above 40 years). Both groups were majority White. Fifty-nine percentage of PDs have a parent/guardian who attained a graduate degree versus 15% of PCs. Forty-eight percentage of PDs speak another language compared with 16% of PCs. More importantly, 95% of PDs had an opportunity to engage in diversity and inclusion-related activities in the last 6 months as compared with 43% of PCs; however, we did not find a statistical difference based on knowledge of increasing institutional capacity of diversity and inclusion between the 2 groups. PCs were more likely to witness discrimination (64%) than PDs (40%) in the health care setting, with body type/weight emerging as the most common type of discrimination. Very few respondents (10%) indicated they discriminated against others. Conclusions:. Plastic surgery educators are committed to diversity and inclusion. Improvements can be made by incorporating PCs more frequently in activities related to the topic along with focused training on improving diversity on an institutional rather than individual level. Our study suggests body type/weight is the most common type of discrimination witnessed by the entire cohort and that diversity and inclusion remains a sensitive topic.http://journals.lww.com/prsgo/fulltext/10.1097/GOX.0000000000001469
spellingShingle Sara Obeid, MD, MPH
Alex Fanning, BS
C. Scott Hultman, MD, MBA
Diversity and Inclusion in Plastic Surgery Education: A National Survey by the American Council of Academic Plastic Surgeons
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Global Open
title Diversity and Inclusion in Plastic Surgery Education: A National Survey by the American Council of Academic Plastic Surgeons
title_full Diversity and Inclusion in Plastic Surgery Education: A National Survey by the American Council of Academic Plastic Surgeons
title_fullStr Diversity and Inclusion in Plastic Surgery Education: A National Survey by the American Council of Academic Plastic Surgeons
title_full_unstemmed Diversity and Inclusion in Plastic Surgery Education: A National Survey by the American Council of Academic Plastic Surgeons
title_short Diversity and Inclusion in Plastic Surgery Education: A National Survey by the American Council of Academic Plastic Surgeons
title_sort diversity and inclusion in plastic surgery education a national survey by the american council of academic plastic surgeons
url http://journals.lww.com/prsgo/fulltext/10.1097/GOX.0000000000001469
work_keys_str_mv AT saraobeidmdmph diversityandinclusioninplasticsurgeryeducationanationalsurveybytheamericancouncilofacademicplasticsurgeons
AT alexfanningbs diversityandinclusioninplasticsurgeryeducationanationalsurveybytheamericancouncilofacademicplasticsurgeons
AT cscotthultmanmdmba diversityandinclusioninplasticsurgeryeducationanationalsurveybytheamericancouncilofacademicplasticsurgeons