A Comparison of Precise Leveling and Persistent Scatterer SAR Interferometry for Building Subsidence Rate Measurement

It is well known that the most accurate method to detect changes of height is the geodetic precise leveling method. Due to the high demand work and time needed for precise leveling alternative methods are studied to obtain high quality height information. Differential SAR interferometry techniques s...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Paavo Rouhiainen, Jarkko Koskinen, Veikko Saaranen, Juha Hyyppä, Mika Karjalainen, Kirsi Karila
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2013-08-01
Series:ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/2220-9964/2/3/797
_version_ 1818324155400978432
author Paavo Rouhiainen
Jarkko Koskinen
Veikko Saaranen
Juha Hyyppä
Mika Karjalainen
Kirsi Karila
author_facet Paavo Rouhiainen
Jarkko Koskinen
Veikko Saaranen
Juha Hyyppä
Mika Karjalainen
Kirsi Karila
author_sort Paavo Rouhiainen
collection DOAJ
description It is well known that the most accurate method to detect changes of height is the geodetic precise leveling method. Due to the high demand work and time needed for precise leveling alternative methods are studied to obtain high quality height information. Differential SAR interferometry techniques such as the Persistent Scatterer Interferometry (PSI) method are studied to detect millimeter level deformations in urban areas. Additionally, SAR analysis will provide spatially extensive information on subsidence. On the other hand, PSI subsidence rates have not yet been comprehensively compared to the precise leveling measurements of the subsidence of individual buildings. Typically subsidence rates are interpolated to a continuous spatial surface, but in this study, spatially discontinuous subsidence was measured for a set of individual buildings. Therefore, we conducted three precise leveling campaigns and measured in total 82 geodetic-grade bolts, which were tightly attached to the building foundations. Moreover, we used additional leveling data (obtained from the local authorities), which contained long time series of leveling data for individual buildings. In the present study, ERS and ENVISAT satellite SAR data were processed using a PSI algorithm and the results were compared to leveling data of individual buildings.
first_indexed 2024-12-13T11:24:05Z
format Article
id doaj.art-49c7becbf07446aca360051d1dd6a467
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2220-9964
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-13T11:24:05Z
publishDate 2013-08-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information
spelling doaj.art-49c7becbf07446aca360051d1dd6a4672022-12-21T23:48:20ZengMDPI AGISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information2220-99642013-08-012379781610.3390/ijgi2030797A Comparison of Precise Leveling and Persistent Scatterer SAR Interferometry for Building Subsidence Rate MeasurementPaavo RouhiainenJarkko KoskinenVeikko SaaranenJuha HyyppäMika KarjalainenKirsi KarilaIt is well known that the most accurate method to detect changes of height is the geodetic precise leveling method. Due to the high demand work and time needed for precise leveling alternative methods are studied to obtain high quality height information. Differential SAR interferometry techniques such as the Persistent Scatterer Interferometry (PSI) method are studied to detect millimeter level deformations in urban areas. Additionally, SAR analysis will provide spatially extensive information on subsidence. On the other hand, PSI subsidence rates have not yet been comprehensively compared to the precise leveling measurements of the subsidence of individual buildings. Typically subsidence rates are interpolated to a continuous spatial surface, but in this study, spatially discontinuous subsidence was measured for a set of individual buildings. Therefore, we conducted three precise leveling campaigns and measured in total 82 geodetic-grade bolts, which were tightly attached to the building foundations. Moreover, we used additional leveling data (obtained from the local authorities), which contained long time series of leveling data for individual buildings. In the present study, ERS and ENVISAT satellite SAR data were processed using a PSI algorithm and the results were compared to leveling data of individual buildings.http://www.mdpi.com/2220-9964/2/3/797persistent scatterer interferometry PSIprecise levelingdiscontinuous urban subsidenceSARTurku
spellingShingle Paavo Rouhiainen
Jarkko Koskinen
Veikko Saaranen
Juha Hyyppä
Mika Karjalainen
Kirsi Karila
A Comparison of Precise Leveling and Persistent Scatterer SAR Interferometry for Building Subsidence Rate Measurement
ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information
persistent scatterer interferometry PSI
precise leveling
discontinuous urban subsidence
SAR
Turku
title A Comparison of Precise Leveling and Persistent Scatterer SAR Interferometry for Building Subsidence Rate Measurement
title_full A Comparison of Precise Leveling and Persistent Scatterer SAR Interferometry for Building Subsidence Rate Measurement
title_fullStr A Comparison of Precise Leveling and Persistent Scatterer SAR Interferometry for Building Subsidence Rate Measurement
title_full_unstemmed A Comparison of Precise Leveling and Persistent Scatterer SAR Interferometry for Building Subsidence Rate Measurement
title_short A Comparison of Precise Leveling and Persistent Scatterer SAR Interferometry for Building Subsidence Rate Measurement
title_sort comparison of precise leveling and persistent scatterer sar interferometry for building subsidence rate measurement
topic persistent scatterer interferometry PSI
precise leveling
discontinuous urban subsidence
SAR
Turku
url http://www.mdpi.com/2220-9964/2/3/797
work_keys_str_mv AT paavorouhiainen acomparisonofpreciselevelingandpersistentscatterersarinterferometryforbuildingsubsidenceratemeasurement
AT jarkkokoskinen acomparisonofpreciselevelingandpersistentscatterersarinterferometryforbuildingsubsidenceratemeasurement
AT veikkosaaranen acomparisonofpreciselevelingandpersistentscatterersarinterferometryforbuildingsubsidenceratemeasurement
AT juhahyyppa acomparisonofpreciselevelingandpersistentscatterersarinterferometryforbuildingsubsidenceratemeasurement
AT mikakarjalainen acomparisonofpreciselevelingandpersistentscatterersarinterferometryforbuildingsubsidenceratemeasurement
AT kirsikarila acomparisonofpreciselevelingandpersistentscatterersarinterferometryforbuildingsubsidenceratemeasurement
AT paavorouhiainen comparisonofpreciselevelingandpersistentscatterersarinterferometryforbuildingsubsidenceratemeasurement
AT jarkkokoskinen comparisonofpreciselevelingandpersistentscatterersarinterferometryforbuildingsubsidenceratemeasurement
AT veikkosaaranen comparisonofpreciselevelingandpersistentscatterersarinterferometryforbuildingsubsidenceratemeasurement
AT juhahyyppa comparisonofpreciselevelingandpersistentscatterersarinterferometryforbuildingsubsidenceratemeasurement
AT mikakarjalainen comparisonofpreciselevelingandpersistentscatterersarinterferometryforbuildingsubsidenceratemeasurement
AT kirsikarila comparisonofpreciselevelingandpersistentscatterersarinterferometryforbuildingsubsidenceratemeasurement